All courts — latest judgments

51. NARAYAN BHAGWANTRAO GOSAVI BALAJIWALE versus GOPAL VINAYAK GOSAVI AND OTHERS

    Supreme Court of India 22 September 1959 1959 INSC 118 [1960] 1 S.C.R. 773 Cited by 167

    Case: NARAYAN BHAGWANTRAO GOSAVI BALAJIWALE versus GOPAL VINAYAK GOSAVI AND OTHERS [[1960] 1 S.C.R. 773] (1960) Section: ISSUES S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS NARAYAN BHAGW ANTRAO GOSA VI f' BALAJIWALE v. GOPAL VINAYAK GOSAVI AND OTHERS (S. R. DAS, C.J., S. K. DAS and M. …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das

52. ABDUL REHMAN MAHOMED YUSUF versus MAHOMED HAJI AHMAD AGBOTWALA AND ANOTHER

    Supreme Court of India 15 September 1959 1959 INSC 115 [1960] 1 S.C.R. 749

    Case: ABDUL REHMAN MAHOMED YUSUF versus MAHOMED HAJI AHMAD AGBOTWALA AND ANOTHER [[1960] 1 S.C.R. 749] (1960) Section: CONCLUSION S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS ABDUL REHMAN MAHOMED YUSUF v. MAHOMED HAJI AHMAD AGBOTVI ALA AND ANOTHER (SYED JAFER IMAM and K. N. WANCHOO, JJ.) …

    Syed Jaffer Imam

53. CHIMANLAL PREMCHAND versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY

    Supreme Court of India 15 September 1959 1959 INSC 117 [1960] 1 S.C.R. 764 Cited by 1

    Case: CHIMANLAL PREMCHAND versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY [[1960] 1 S.C.R. 764] (1960) Section: SECTION 764 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960(1)] r959 was a graver offence; sometimes involving the security J ethanand Bet ab of the State, and so an amendment was introduced in v. 1949 …

    Syed Jaffer Imam

54. JETHANAND BETAB versus THE STATE OF DELHI

    Supreme Court of India 15 September 1959 1959 INSC 116 [1960] 1 S.C.R. 755 Cited by 4

    Case: JETHANAND BETAB versus THE STATE OF DELHI [[1960] 1 S.C.R. 755] (1960) Section: BODY S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 755 In this appeal this Court can do what the High r959 Court could have done. We accordtngly allow the Abdul Rehman appeal and set aside the order of …

    Syed Jaffer Imam

55. THE STATE OF BIHAR versus HIRALAL KEJRIWAL AND ANOTHER

    Supreme Court of India 14 September 1959 1959 INSC 114 [1960] 1 S.C.R. 726 Cited by 34

    Case: THE STATE OF BIHAR versus HIRALAL KEJRIWAL AND ANOTHER [[1960] 1 S.C.R. 726] (1960) Section: BODY 726 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960(1)) r959 s. 25E of the Act. It was conceded on behalf the , .-d respondent workmen that the lay-off in the factory was nsso"ate Cement d 1 f l' …

    Syed Jaffer Imam

56. CHHADAMI LAL JAIN AND OTHERS versus THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER

    Supreme Court of India 14 September 1959 1959 INSC 113 [1960] 1 S.C.R. 736

    Case: CHHADAMI LAL JAIN AND OTHERS versus THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER [[1960] 1 S.C.R. 736] (1960) Section: SECTION '959 The State of Bihar v. Hiralal Kejriwal and Another Subba Rao ]. '959 736 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960(1)] ground for permitting the application tO …

    Syed Jaffer Imam

57. THE ASSOCIATED CEMENT COMPANIES LIMITED, CHAIBASSA CEMENT WORKS, JHINKPANI versus THEIR WORKMEN

    Supreme Court of India 11 September 1959 1959 INSC 112 [1960] 1 S.C.R. 703 Cited by 46

    Case: THE ASSOCIATED CEMENT COMPANIES LIMITED, CHAIBASSA CEMENT WORKS, JHINKPANI versus THEIR WORKMEN [[1960] 1 S.C.R. 703] (1960) Section: BODY S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS THE ASSOCIATED CEMENT COMPANIES LIMITED, CHAIBASSA CEMENT WORKS, JHINKPANI v. THEIR WORKMEN (S. R. …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das

58. LILACHAND TULJARAM GUJAR AND OTHERS versus MALLAPPA TUKARAM BORGAVI AND OTHERS

    Supreme Court of India 11 September 1959 1959 INSC 111 [1960] 1 S.C.R. 693

    Case: LILACHAND TULJARAM GUJAR AND OTHERS versus MALLAPPA TUKARAM BORGAVI AND OTHERS [[1960] 1 S.C.R. 693] (1960) Section: BODY 693 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS and the provisions contained in Part XVIII of the Constitution. This contention also fails. It now remains to notice …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das

59. RADHA PRASAD SINGH versus GAJADHAR SINGH & OTHERS

    Supreme Court of India 7 September 1959 1959 INSC 109 [1960] 1 S.C.R. 663 Cited by 13

    Case: RADHA PRASAD SINGH versus GAJADHAR SINGH & OTHERS [[1960] 1 S.C.R. 663] (1960) Section: BODY 663 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS ready for instant use near the confined space arises as soon as a person is about to enter it, obviously with the C'. .. fh . s.1: h d perm1ss10n o …

    Sudhi Ranjan Das

60. CHINUBHAI HARIDAS versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY

    Supreme Court of India 4 September 1959 1959 INSC 108 [1960] 1 S.C.R. 654

    Case: CHINUBHAI HARIDAS versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY [[1960] 1 S.C.R. 654] (1960) Section: BODY r959 Vishwanath v. Th• Stal• of UUar Prad1sb Wanchoo ]. r959 654 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960(1)] ' only one below with an ordinary knife which, if it had been a littfe this way or that …

    Syed Jaffer Imam