All courts — latest judgments

1. ORIENTAL METAL PRESSING WORKS (P.) versus BHASKAR KASHINATH THAKOOR & ANOTHER

   Supreme Court of India 16 December 1960 1960 INSC 275 [1961] 3 S.C.R. 329

   Case: ORIENTAL METAL PRESSING WORKS (P.) versus BHASKAR KASHINATH THAKOOR & ANOTHER [[1961] 3 S.C.R. 329] (1961) Section: BODY his father's name and his residence. All the details given in the extract tallied with the description of the appellant. In the memorandum of appeal …

   Syed Jaffer Imam

2. DIAMOND SUGAR MILLS LTD., AND ANOTHER versus THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER

   Supreme Court of India 13 December 1960 1960 INSC 265 [1961] 3 S.C.R. 242 Cited by 57

   Case: DIAMOND SUGAR MILLS LTD., AND ANOTHER versus THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER [[1961] 3 S.C.R. 242] (1961) Section: BODY 242 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (1961] I Finance Act was not applicable in that pa.se. In the The Income-ta:¥ second there was no profit in any …

   Syed Jaffer Imam

3. KUNNATHAT THATHUNNI MOOPIL NAIR versus THE STATE OF KERALA AND ANOTHER

   Supreme Court of India 9 December 1960 1960 INSC 255 [1961] 3 S.C.R. 77 Cited by 717

   Case: KUNNATHAT THATHUNNI MOOPIL NAIR versus THE STATE OF KERALA AND ANOTHER [[1961] 3 S.C.R. 77] (1961) Section: SECTION 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS The Tribunal had come to the conclusion that no pay. ment in addition to the salary, annual bonus and rh c · 1 b · "fi d d . f …

   Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha, Syed Jaffer Imam, A.K. Sarkar and others

4. SANWAT SINGH & OTHERS versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN

   Supreme Court of India 9 December 1960 1960 INSC 256 [1961] 3 S.C.R. 120 Cited by 162

   Case: SANWAT SINGH & OTHERS versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN [[1961] 3 S.C.R. 120] (1961) Section: BODY December 9. SUPREME COURT BEPORTS SANW AT SINGH & OTHERS v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN (JAFER IMAM, K. ·SuBBA RAO and RAGHUB.AR DAYAL, JJ.) Appeal-Against acquittal-Principles to be …

   Syed Jaffer Imam

5. SHRIRAM & OTHERS versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY

   Supreme Court of India 5 December 1960 1960 INSC 237 [1961] 2 S.C.R. 890 Cited by 28

   Case: SHRIRAM & OTHERS versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY [[1961] 2 S.C.R. 890] (1961) Section: BODY 890 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1961] I96o out any such statutory rule and except making a -- l) general grievance that too many persons have been Rameshwa' ayal recruited from the Bar, he …

   Syed Jaffer Imam

6. M/S. MADAN MOHAN DAMMA MAL LTD. AND ANR. versus THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR.

   Supreme Court of India 24 November 1960 1960 INSC 219 [1961] 2 S.C.R. 664

   Case: M/S. MADAN MOHAN DAMMA MAL LTD. AND ANR. versus THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR. [[1961] 2 S.C.R. 664] (1961) Section: SECTION 664 •96o that a penalty paid for an infraction of the law, even though it may involve no personal liability in the Haji Aziz f fi £ v. sense o a …

   Syed Jaffer Imam, A.K. Sarkar, Raghubar Dayal

7. ABDUL HAKIM QURAISHI AND OTHERS versus THE STATE OF BIHAR (AND CONNECTED PETITIONS)

   Supreme Court of India 23 November 1960 1960 INSC 214 [1961] 2 S.C.R. 610 Cited by 7

   Case: ABDUL HAKIM QURAISHI AND OTHERS versus THE STATE OF BIHAR (AND CONNECTED PETITIONS) [[1961] 2 S.C.R. 610] (1961) Section: BODY 1960 November a3. 610 ABDUL HAKIM QURAISHI AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF BIHAR (AND CONNECTED PETITIONS) (JAFER IMAM, s. K. DAS, J. L. KAPUR, A. K. …

   Syed Jaffer Imam

8. PRATAP SINGH versus THE STATE OF VINDHYA PRADESH (NOW MADHYA PRADESH)

   Supreme Court of India 18 November 1960 1960 INSC 208 [1961] 2 S.C.R. 509 Cited by 1

   Case: PRATAP SINGH versus THE STATE OF VINDHYA PRADESH (NOW MADHYA PRADESH) [[1961] 2 S.C.R. 509] (1961) Section: BODY PRATAP SINGH v. THE STATE OF VINDHYA PRADESH (NOW MADHYA PRADESH) JAFER IMAM, J. L. KAPUR, K. c. DAS GUPTA, RAGHUBAR DAYAL and N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR, JJ. …

   Syed Jaffer Imam, J.L. Kapur, K.C. Das Gupta and others

9. KEKI BEJONJI AND ANOTHER versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY

   Supreme Court of India 18 November 1960 1960 INSC 209 [1961] 2 S.C.R. 515

   Case: KEKI BEJONJI AND ANOTHER versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY [[1961] 2 S.C.R. 515] (1961) Section: BODY 2 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 515 heard. From that point of view the provisions of r96o s. 421 had not been complied with. It is sufficient to Pratap Singh say that if the order …

   Syed Jaffer Imam, K. Subba Rao, Raghubar Dayal

10. MAHARAJA PRAVIR CHANDRA BHANJ DEO KAKATIYA versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

    Supreme Court of India 18 November 1960 1960 INSC 207 [1961] 2 S.C.R. 501 Cited by 9

    Case: MAHARAJA PRAVIR CHANDRA BHANJ DEO KAKATIYA versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [[1961] 2 S.C.R. 501] (1961) Section: CONCLUSION I • 2 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS MAHARAJA PRAVIR CHANDRA BHANJ DEO KAKATIYA v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH (J AFER IMAM, J. L. KAPUR, K. c. DAS …

    Syed Jaffer Imam