Filter results by 1

Courts

Judges in the latest 280

Years

Decided between

1960-01-01 and 1960-12-31 · clear

Clear all filters

All courts — latest judgments

101–110 of 280 judgments, newest first (0.08 seconds)

  1. PANNALAL NANDLAL BHANDARI versus THE COMMISSIONEE OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY CITY, BOMBAY.

    Supreme Court of India 18 October 1960 1960 INSC 178 [1961] 2 S.C.R. 35 Cited by 1

    Case: PANNALAL NANDLAL BHANDARI versus THE COMMISSIONEE OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY CITY, BOMBAY. [[1961] 2 S.C.R. 35] (1961) Section: SECTION 2 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 35 requirements of s. 57 of the Bombay Police Act, must be made bona fide, taking into account a conviction …

    S.K. Das

  2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADHYA PRADESH & BHOPAL, NAGPUR versus BHOPAL TEXTILES LTD., BHOPAL.

    Supreme Court of India 17 October 1960 1960 INSC 175 [1961] 2 S.C.R. 9 Cited by 2

    Case: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADHYA PRADESH & BHOPAL, NAGPUR versus BHOPAL TEXTILES LTD., BHOPAL... [[1961] 2 S.C.R. 9] (1961) Section: BODY 2 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADHYA PRADESH & BHOPAL, NAGPUR v. BHOPAL TEXTILES LTD., BHOPAL. …

    S.K. Das

  3. THE SUPREME COURT REPORTS STATE OF BIHAR versus KRIPA SHANKAR JAISWAL

    Supreme Court of India 14 October 1960 1960 INSC 174 [1961] 2 S.C.R. 1

    Case: THE SUPREME COURT REPORTS STATE OF BIHAR versus KRIPA SHANKAR JAISWAL [[1961] 2 S.C.R. 1] (1961) Section: SECTION THE SUPREME COURT REPORTS STATE OF BIHAR v. KRIPA SHANKAR J AISW AL (J. L. KAPUR, P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, K. SuBBA RAO a.nd K .. N. WANOHOO, JJ.) Industrial …

    J.L. Kapur

  4. CS(OS)/2326/1996 of BALDEV SINGH Vs SKIPPER TOWERS P LTD.

    Delhi High Court 10 October 1960

    2326/1996 Page 1 of 9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 13th March, 2023 Pronounced on: 04th July, 2023 + CS (OS) 2326/1996 BALDEV SINGH R/o D-74, Vivek Vihar, Delhi. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Deepanshu and Ms. Ankita Chopra, Advocates. Versus SKIPPER …

  5. PURUSHOTTAM UMEDBHAI & CO. versus M/S MANILAL AND SONS (IN CONNECTED APPEALS)

    Supreme Court of India 7 October 1960 1960 INSC 173 [1961] 1 S.C.R. 982 Cited by 44

    Case: PURUSHOTTAM UMEDBHAI & CO. versus M/S MANILAL AND SONS (IN CONNECTED APPEALS) [[1961] 1 S.C.R. 982] (1961) Section: BODY October 7. 982 Sl1PREME COURT REPORTS [ 1961] Pt;RUSHOTTA!\I UMEDBHAI & CO. v. M/S . .MANILAL AND SONS (IX co:-.NECTED APPEALS) (8. ,J. htAM, A. K. …

    Syed Jaffer Imam

  6. AMBA LAL versus THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

    Supreme Court of India 3 October 1960 1960 INSC 168 [1961] 1 S.C.R. 933 Cited by 4

    Case: AMBA LAL versus THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [[1961] 1 S.C.R. 933] (1961) Section: BODY " 1 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 933 '9[[60 ]] has to declare only an intention and th&t if ultim&te-'9[[60 ]]ly the actual despatch is made by some person who is B. K. Wadeyar not a …

    Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha

  7. MADHAORAO PHALKE versus THE STATE OF MADHYA BHARAT

    Supreme Court of India 3 October 1960 1960 INSC 171 [1961] 1 S.C.R. 957 Cited by 6

    Case: MADHAORAO PHALKE versus THE STATE OF MADHYA BHARAT [[1961] 1 S.C.R. 957] (1961) Section: STATUTES provision, the settlement on which this land was held 1960 as inam land must be deemed to have been made under this Chapter and therefore it cannot be said that no Rangildas …

    Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha

  8. RANGILDAS VARAJDAS KHANDWALA versus COLLECTOR OF SURAT AND OTHERS.

    Supreme Court of India 3 October 1960 1960 INSC 170 [1961] 1 S.C.R. 951 Cited by 1

    Case: RANGILDAS VARAJDAS KHANDWALA versus COLLECTOR OF SURAT AND OTHERS. [[1961] 1 S.C.R. 951] (1961) Section: BODY 1 s.c.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS RANGILDAS VARAJDAS KHANDW ALA v. COLLECTOR OF SURAT AND OTHERS. (B. P. SINHA, c. J., J. L. KAPUR, P. B. GAJENDRAGAD.KAR, K. SUBBA …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

  9. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANOTHER versus BALDEO PRASAD

    Supreme Court of India 3 October 1960 1960 INSC 172 [1961] 1 S.C.R. 970 Cited by 17

    Case: THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANOTHER versus BALDEO PRASAD [[1961] 1 S.C.R. 970] (1961) Section: SECTION 970 SUPREME COURT REPORTS 196° the appellant's right is based a.re rules or regulations M having the force of law the impugned executive order adhavrao PhaJAe 1ssu • …

    Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha

  10. GANGAHARRAO NARAYANRAO MAJUMDAR versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY AND ANOTHER (WITH CONNECTED APPEALS)

    Supreme Court of India 3 October 1960 1960 INSC 169 [1961] 1 S.C.R. 943

    Case: GANGAHARRAO NARAYANRAO MAJUMDAR versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY AND ANOTHER (WITH CONNECTED APPEALS) [[1961] 1 S.C.R. 943] (1961) Section: BODY to 5, the amount of the penalty of Rs. 25,000 should proportionately be reduced. There is justification for this contention. But we …

    Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead