All courts — latest judgments

181. THE EAST AND WEST STEAMSHIP COMP ANY, GEORGE TOWN, MADRAS versus S. K. RAMALINGAM CHETTIAR.

     Supreme Court of India 3 May 1960 1960 INSC 98 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 820 Cited by 15

     Case: THE EAST AND WEST STEAMSHIP COMP ANY, GEORGE TOWN, MADRAS versus S. K. RAMALINGAM CHETTIAR. [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 820] (1960) Section: PARAGRAPH May 3. 820 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960] THE EAST AND WEST STEAMSHIP COMP ANY, GEORGE TOWN, MADRAS v. S. K. RAMALINGAM CHETTIAR. (And …

     P.B. Gajendragadkar

182. THE COTTON AGENTS LTD., BOMBAY versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY

     Supreme Court of India 3 May 1960 1960 INSC 99 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 810

     Case: THE COTTON AGENTS LTD., BOMBAY versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 810] (1960) Section: SECTION Chandaji Kubaji & Co. v. State of A ndhra P-radesh S. K. Das]. x960 May3. 810 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960] on deliberate negligence and fraud and amounts …

     S.K. Das

183. SHRIMANT DATTAJIRAO BAHIROJIRAO GHORPADE versus SHRIMANT VIJAYASINHRAO AND ANOTHER.

     Supreme Court of India 29 April 1960 1960 INSC 96 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 789

     Case: SHRIMANT DATTAJIRAO BAHIROJIRAO GHORPADE versus SHRIMANT VIJAYASINHRAO AND ANOTHER. [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 789] (1960) Section: BODY 3 S.0.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS Ig6o Order of Court. In view of the majority judgment of the Court, the Arunachalam Pillai appeal is allowed with …

     S.K. Das

184. M/S. CHANDAJI KUBAJI & CO. versus THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH.

     Supreme Court of India 29 April 1960 1960 INSC 97 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 804

     Case: M/S. CHANDAJI KUBAJI & CO. versus THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 804] (1960) Section: SECTION 804 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960) r96o We accordingly allow this appeal, set aside the Shrimant Dattajirao judgment and decree of the High Court dated N …

     S.K. Das

185. A. S. T. ARUNACHALAM PILLAI versus M/S. SOUTHERN ROADWAYS (PRIVATE) LTD.

     Supreme Court of India 29 April 1960 1960 INSC 95 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 764 Cited by 16

     Case: A. S. T. ARUNACHALAM PILLAI versus M/S. SOUTHERN ROADWAYS (PRIVATE) LTD. [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 764] (1960) Section: PARAGRAPH 764 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960] 1960 case and the validity of s. 11 could not in view of Art. 31-A be challenged. The validity of the provi-Jadab Singh …

     Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha

186. JADAB SINGH AND OTHERS versus THE HIMACHAL PRADESH ADMINISTRATION . AND ANOTHER

     Supreme Court of India 28 April 1960 1960 INSC 93 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 755

     Case: JADAB SINGH AND OTHERS versus THE HIMACHAL PRADESH ADMINISTRATION . AND ANOTHER [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 755] (1960) Section: BODY ,. .• - r , 3 S.C.R. SUPREM'E'COURT REPORTS·· JADAB SINGH AND OTHERS v. PRADESH . AND ANOTHER ...,., THE HIMACHAL PRADESH ADMINISTRATION ...,., . (B. …

     Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha

187. H. C. NARAYANAPPA AND OTHERS versus THE STATE OF MYSORE AND OTHERS

     Supreme Court of India 28 April 1960 1960 INSC 92 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 742 Cited by 12

     Case: H. C. NARAYANAPPA AND OTHERS versus THE STATE OF MYSORE AND OTHERS [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 742] (1960) Section: BODY 742 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960] 1960 here any hypothetical difficulty which may arise in the application of s. 6. . Commissioner of lnco.ne-ta,,; v. The appellant …

     Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha

188. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, AHMEDABAD· versus KARAMCHAND PREMCHAND LTD., AHMEDABAD

     Supreme Court of India 28 April 1960 1960 INSC 94 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 727 Cited by 7

     Case: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, AHMEDABAD· versus KARAMCHAND PREMCHAND LTD., AHMEDABAD [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 727] (1960) Section: BODY ) arbitration they did not anticipate the complications which have subsequently arisen. That is why an arbitration agreement may have been …

     S.K. Das

189. THE PRINTERS (MYSORE) PRIVATE LTD. versus POTHAN JOSEPH

     Supreme Court of India 27 April 1960 1960 INSC 91 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 713 Cited by 293

     Case: THE PRINTERS (MYSORE) PRIVATE LTD. versus POTHAN JOSEPH [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 713] (1960) Section: BODY 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS All these cases turned on different facts, and it is not necessary to decide which of them in the special nrcumstances were correctly decided. …

     P.B. Gajendragadkar

190. PINGLE INDUSTRIES LTD., SECUNDERABAD versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HYDERABAD

     Supreme Court of India 26 April 1960 1960 INSC 90 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 681 Cited by 1

     Case: PINGLE INDUSTRIES LTD., SECUNDERABAD versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HYDERABAD [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 681] (1960) Section: BODY PING LE INDUSTRIES LTD., SECUNDERABAD v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HYDERABAD· (S. K. DAs, ]. L. KAPUR and M. HrnAYATULLAH, JJ.) Income …

     S.K. Das