All courts — latest judgments

11. THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, ALWAYE versus THE ASOK TEXTILES LTD., ALWAYE

    Supreme Court of India 13 December 1960 1960 INSC 266 [1961] 3 S.C.R. 236 Cited by 2

    Case: THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, ALWAYE versus THE ASOK TEXTILES LTD., ALWAYE [[1961] 3 S.C.R. 236] (1961) Section: BODY 236 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1961] ,960 folders. That was the finding made by the authority on an earlier occasion when Punamchand and Vishnuc Sh•i Ambic• Mills …

    J.L. Kapur

12. DIAMOND SUGAR MILLS LTD., AND ANOTHER versus THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER

    Supreme Court of India 13 December 1960 1960 INSC 265 [1961] 3 S.C.R. 242 Cited by 57

    Case: DIAMOND SUGAR MILLS LTD., AND ANOTHER versus THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER [[1961] 3 S.C.R. 242] (1961) Section: BODY 242 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (1961] I Finance Act was not applicable in that pa.se. In the The Income-ta:¥ second there was no profit in any …

    Syed Jaffer Imam

13. RAM PRASAD VISHWAKARMA versus THE CHAIRMAN, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL

    Supreme Court of India 12 December 1960 1960 INSC 262 [1961] 3 S.C.R. 196 Cited by 2

    Case: RAM PRASAD VISHWAKARMA versus THE CHAIRMAN, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL [[1961] 3 S.C.R. 196] (1961) Section: BODY 196 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1961) z96o reached by any writ of the Allahabad High Court. In -view of our conclusion that the application under Ths spinnin J. K. Cotton …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

14. THE LORD KRISHNA TEXTILE MILLS versus ITS WORKMEN

    Supreme Court of India 12 December 1960 1960 INSC 264 [1961] 3 S.C.R. 204 Cited by 118

    Case: THE LORD KRISHNA TEXTILE MILLS versus ITS WORKMEN [[1961] 3 S.C.R. 204] (1961) Section: BODY r960 December Ia. 204 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1961] THE LORD KRISHNA TEXTILE MILLS v. ITS WORKMEN (P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR and K. N. WANCHoo, JJ.) Inauslrial Dispute.-Dismissal of …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

15. SETH JAMNADAS DAGA AND OTHERS versus COMMISSIONER OF TNCOME-TAX, SOUTH BOMBAY

    Supreme Court of India 12 December 1960 1960 INSC 259 [1961] 3 S.C.R. 174

    Case: SETH JAMNADAS DAGA AND OTHERS versus COMMISSIONER OF TNCOME-TAX, SOUTH BOMBAY [[1961] 3 S.C.R. 174] (1961) Section: BODY 174 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1961) Out of this, the tribunal has allowed five months' Voltas Limited basic wages as bonus to the respondents which works …

    J.L. Kapur, M. Hidayatullah, J.C. Shah

16. SHRI AMBICA MILLS CO., LTD. versus SHRI S. B. BHATT AND ANOTHER

    Supreme Court of India 12 December 1960 1960 INSC 263 [1961] 3 S.C.R. 220 Cited by 47

    Case: SHRI AMBICA MILLS CO., LTD. versus SHRI S. B. BHATT AND ANOTHER [[1961] 3 S.C.R. 220] (1961) Section: BODY 220 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1961] '9[60 ]been clearly proved. The charge was that he had n L 7H . • plotted and hatched a conspiracy for assaulting the ~ .. ~;1 …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

17. THE J. K. COTTON SPINNING & WEAVING MILLS CO., LTD. versus THE STATE OF ULTAR PRADESH & ORS.

    Supreme Court of India 12 December 1960 1960 INSC 261 [1961] 3 S.C.R. 185 Cited by 303

    Case: THE J. K. COTTON SPINNING & WEAVING MILLS CO., LTD. versus THE STATE OF ULTAR PRADESH & ORS. [[1961] 3 S.C.R. 185] (1961) Section: BODY Act, both the remedies were open to the authorities, and they could resort to any one of them at their option. The appeal is allowed, and …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

18. STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS. versus C. M. FRANCIS & CO.

    Supreme Court of India 12 December 1960 1960 INSC 260 [1961] 3 S.C.R. 181

    Case: STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS. versus C. M. FRANCIS & CO. [[1961] 3 S.C.R. 181] (1961) Section: BODY 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS. v. C. M. FRANCIS & CO. (J. L. KAPUR, M. HIDAYATULLAH and J. c. SHAH, JJ.) Sales Tax-Recovery of-Remedies open to the …

    J.L. Kapur

19. THE STATE OF BOMBAY versus S. L. APTE & ANOTHER

    Supreme Court of India 9 December 1960 1960 INSC 253 [1961] 3 S.C.R. 107 Cited by 142

    Case: THE STATE OF BOMBAY versus S. L. APTE & ANOTHER [[1961] 3 S.C.R. 107] (1961) Section: BODY 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS z960 on land on which a forest stands is permissible and legal. If. T. Jf oopil Nafr v. Sl•I• of Kerala Sarkar J. For these reasons I would dismiss …

    Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha

20. KUNNATHAT THATHUNNI MOOPIL NAIR versus THE STATE OF KERALA AND ANOTHER

    Supreme Court of India 9 December 1960 1960 INSC 255 [1961] 3 S.C.R. 77 Cited by 717

    Case: KUNNATHAT THATHUNNI MOOPIL NAIR versus THE STATE OF KERALA AND ANOTHER [[1961] 3 S.C.R. 77] (1961) Section: SECTION 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS The Tribunal had come to the conclusion that no pay. ment in addition to the salary, annual bonus and rh c · 1 b · "fi d d . f …

    Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha, Syed Jaffer Imam, A.K. Sarkar and others