All courts — latest judgments

201. QAMAR SHAFFI TYABJI versus THE COI\LI\JLSSLONER, EXCESS PROFITS TAX, HYDERABAD

     Supreme Court of India 18 April 1960 1960 INSC 79 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 546 Cited by 1

     Case: QAMAR SHAFFI TYABJI versus THE COI\LI\JLSSLONER, EXCESS PROFITS TAX, HYDERABAD [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 546] (1960) Section: BODY 196U ln our view, the impugned s. ~.'iFFF(I) indudiug J-Ialisi11gh .1.\lfg. the proviso and the explanation thereto are not 1111-Co. Lid. …

     S.K. Das

202. M/S. HATISINGH MFG. CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS.

     Supreme Court of India 14 April 1960 1960 INSC 77 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 528 Cited by 40

     Case: M/S. HATISINGH MFG. CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS. [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 528] (1960) Section: PARAGRAPH permanenl enjoyment as Kapal-Giras, it has come to an end. 1960 Darbar Shri Vira Vala Surag Vala In that view of the matt.er the jJClitioner must be …

     Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha

203. DARBAR SHRI VIRA VALA SURAG'VALA, VADIA versus THE STATE OF SAURASHTRA (NO-W BOMBAY)

     Supreme Court of India 14 April 1960 1960 INSC 76 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 521

     Case: DARBAR SHRI VIRA VALA SURAG'VALA, VADIA versus THE STATE OF SAURASHTRA (NO-W BOMBAY) [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 521] (1960) Section: BODY • •• 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS vVe have indicated above what is the crucial test in determining an association of persons within the meaning …

     Syed Jaffer Imam

204. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY versus SMT. INDIRA BALKRISHNA

     Supreme Court of India 14 April 1960 1960 INSC 78 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 513 Cited by 12

     Case: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY versus SMT. INDIRA BALKRISHNA [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 513] (1960) Section: SECTION 3 S.C.R. gratuity for other modes' oi termination of service. That was the method followed in the award that fell for comideration fr1 Brahmachari's case. That …

     S.K. Das

205. M/S. MULLER & PHIPPS (INDJA) LTD. versus K. C. SUD

     Supreme Court of India 11 April 1960 1960 INSC 75 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 508

     Case: M/S. MULLER & PHIPPS (INDJA) LTD. versus K. C. SUD [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 508] (1960) Section: PARAGRAPH 1960 cng·aging other a<h·ocates, h:1s not been accepted b)' 111. r~ : Sant Rnm the Registrar. It appears to have been the case that not being a registered clerk, he could not …

     P.B. Gajendragadkar

206. MUIR MILLS CO. LTD., KANPUR versus ITS WORKMEN.

     Supreme Court of India 7 April 1960 1960 INSC 74 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 488

     Case: MUIR MILLS CO. LTD., KANPUR versus ITS WORKMEN. [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 488] (1960) Section: BODY April 7• .i 488 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960] MUIR MILLS CO. LTD., KANPUR v. ITS WORKMEN. ( P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, K. N. WANOHOO and K. c. DAS GUPTA, JJ.) Industr·ial Dispute-Wage …

     P.B. Gajendragadkar

207. MADHYA PR.ADESH MINERAL INDUSTR.Y ASSOCIATION versus THE REGIONAL LABOUR COMMISSIONER JABALPUR AND OTHERS

     Supreme Court of India 7 April 1960 1960 INSC 73 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 476 Cited by 104

     Case: MADHYA PR.ADESH MINERAL INDUSTR.Y ASSOCIATION versus THE REGIONAL LABOUR COMMISSIONER JABALPUR AND O... [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 476] (1960) Section: BODY SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960] . 476 z96o and if it resulted in retrenchment that was d -:;-;:; inevitable. These facts would …

     P.B. Gajendragadkar

208. IN RE: SANT RAM versus .

     Supreme Court of India 7 April 1960 1960 INSC 72 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 499 Cited by 55

     Case: IN RE: SANT RAM versus . [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 499] (1960) Section: BODY • 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 499 employer including the production and incentive bonuses in the calculation of the rates of the basic wage o f t e h worKer:s . an d consequent y l t h at t e h …

     Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha

209. THE STANDARD.VACUUM REFINING CO. OF INDIA LTD. versus ITS WORKMEN AND OTHERS.

     Supreme Court of India 6 April 1960 1960 INSC 71 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 466 Cited by 27

     Case: THE STANDARD.VACUUM REFINING CO. OF INDIA LTD. versus ITS WORKMEN AND OTHERS. [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 466] (1960) Section: PARAGRAPH 466 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960J be set aside. We would accordingly set aside the order of reinstatement and direct that the appellant should Assam …

     P.B. Gajendragadkar

210. THE CHARTERED BANK, BOMBAY versus THE CHARTERED BANK EMPLOYEES UNION.

     Supreme Court of India 4 April 1960 1960 INSC 68 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 441 Cited by 8

     Case: THE CHARTERED BANK, BOMBAY versus THE CHARTERED BANK EMPLOYEES UNION. [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 441] (1960) Section: CONCLUSION 441 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS THE CHARTERED BANK, BOMBAY v. THE CHARTERED BANK EMPLOYEES' UNION. (P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, K.N. W ANCHOO and K. c. DAS …

     P.B. Gajendragadkar