All courts — latest judgments

211. THE MANAGEMENT OF CHANDRAMALAI ESTATE, ERNAKULAM versus ITS WORKMEN AND ANOTHER.

     Supreme Court of India 4 April 1960 1960 INSC 69 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 451 Cited by 4

     Case: THE MANAGEMENT OF CHANDRAMALAI ESTATE, ERNAKULAM versus ITS WORKMEN AND ANOTHER. [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 451] (1960) Section: CONCLUSION 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS THE MANAGEMENT OF CHANDRAMALAI ESTATE, ERNAKULAM v. ITS WORKMEN AND ANOTHER. ( P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR,,K. N. W …

     P.B. Gajendragadkar

212. ASSAM. OIL COMP ANY versus ITS WORKMEN

     Supreme Court of India 4 April 1960 1960 INSC 70 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 457 Cited by 17

     Case: ASSAM. OIL COMP ANY versus ITS WORKMEN [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 457] (1960) Section: BODY 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS We therefore allow the appeal in part and set aside the award in so far as it directed the payment of 50% of the total emoluments for the strike period but …

     P.B. Gajendragadkar

213. N ANDLAL MISRA versus K. L. MISRA

     Supreme Court of India 1 April 1960 1960 INSC 67 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 431

     Case: N ANDLAL MISRA versus K. L. MISRA [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 431] (1960) Section: BODY 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS such circumstances is itself void. Neither do we understand Mulla, J., to take the view that apart from s. 2 L of the Act, the commitment was void because the …

     K. Subba Rao

214. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH versus KHUSHI RAM

     Supreme Court of India 1 April 1960 1960 INSC 66 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 427

     Case: THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH versus KHUSHI RAM [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 427] (1960) Section: BODY 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 427 tribunal. It has dealt with the history relating to this tiffin allowance and exhaustively considered all the points raised on behalf of the.workmen. …

     Syed Jaffer Imam

215. M/S. BURN & CO. LTD. & OTHERS versus THEIR EMPLOYEES.

     Supreme Court of India 30 March 1960 1960 INSC 65 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 423 Cited by 2

     Case: M/S. BURN & CO. LTD. & OTHERS versus THEIR EMPLOYEES. [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 423] (1960) Section: BODY 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS were all decisions of the same Court, and arose in different circumstances. In two of them, the question was wide enough to take in a fine of …

     P.B. Gajendragadkar

216. MRS. KUSUMBEN D. MAHADEVIA versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY.

     Supreme Court of India 30 March 1960 1960 INSC 64 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 417 Cited by 3

     Case: MRS. KUSUMBEN D. MAHADEVIA versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY. [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 417] (1960) Section: CONCLUSION 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS MRS. KUSUMBEN D. MAHADEVIA v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY. (S. K. D.As, J. L. KAPUR and M. HIDAY.A.TULL.AH …

     S.K. Das

217. THE STATE OF BOMBAY versus M/S. S. S. MIRANDA LIMITED

     Supreme Court of India 25 March 1960 1960 INSC 63 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 397 Cited by 1

     Case: THE STATE OF BOMBAY versus M/S. S. S. MIRANDA LIMITED [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 397] (1960) Section: BODY 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 397 any opinion on this part of the appellant's argument. i96o All we wish t,_o say is that we would inevitably have. R. P. Kapur to consider the …

     P.B. Gajendragadkar

218. R. P. KAPUR versus THE STATE OF PUNJAB

     Supreme Court of India 25 March 1960 1960 INSC 61 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 388 Cited by 12,763

     Case: R. P. KAPUR versus THE STATE OF PUNJAB [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 388] (1960) Section: SECTION Ig6o March 25. 388 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960] R. P.KAPUR v. THE STATE OF PUNJAB ( P .B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, K. N. WANCHOO and K. c. DAS GUPTA, JJ.) Criminal Trial-Quashing of …

     P.B. Gajendragadkar

219. KALINDI & OTHERS versus TATA LOCOMOTIVE & ENGINEERING CO., LTD.

     Supreme Court of India 25 March 1960 1960 INSC 62 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 407 Cited by 65

     Case: KALINDI & OTHERS versus TATA LOCOMOTIVE & ENGINEERING CO., LTD. [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 407] (1960) Section: SECTION 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 407 KALINbI & OTHERS v. TA'.l'A LOCOMOTIVE.& ENGINEERING CO., LTD. (P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, K. N. WANCHOO and K. c. DAS GUPTA, JJ.) …

     P.B. Gajendragadkar

220. MANAGEMENT OF KAIRBETTA ESTATE, KOTAGIRI versus RAJ AMANICKAM AND OTHERS.

     Supreme Court of India 24 March 1960 1960 INSC 60 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 371 Cited by 13

     Case: MANAGEMENT OF KAIRBETTA ESTATE, KOTAGIRI versus RAJ AMANICKAM AND OTHERS. [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 371] (1960) Section: RATIO_DECIDENDI 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 371 rationalisation scheme required them to do, they refus-ed to do work, which the employer had no right in law …

     P.B. Gajendragadkar