Filter results by 1

Courts

Judges in the latest 280

Years

Decided between

1960-01-01 and 1960-12-31 · clear

Clear all filters

All courts — latest judgments

231–240 of 280 judgments, newest first (0.05 seconds)

  1. CHARANDAS HARIDAS AND ANOTHER versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY NORTH, KUTCH, SAURASHTRA AND AHMEDABAD & ANOTHER

    Supreme Court of India 15 March 1960 1960 INSC 50 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 296 Cited by 2

    Case: CHARANDAS HARIDAS AND ANOTHER versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY NORTH, KUTCH, SAURASHTR... [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 296] (1960) Section: PARAGRAPH IH fd.' B1rt4bori Union c£. E#changd of Encloues z960 Mllrch .15. 296 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960) as indicated above ; in …

    S.K. Das

  2. IN RE: THE BERUBARI UNION AND EXCHANGE OF ENCLAVES REFERENCE UNDER ARTICLE 143(1) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA versus .

    Supreme Court of India 14 March 1960 1960 INSC 49 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 250 Cited by 18

    Case: IN RE: THE BERUBARI UNION AND EXCHANGE OF ENCLAVES REFERENCE UNDER ARTICLE 143(1) OF THE CONSTITUTIO... [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 250] (1960) Section: PARAGRAPH Pramatha Nath Mul1herjee v. State of West Bengal Dos Gupta ]. Marth z4. 250 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960] tute also a …

    Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha

  3. PRAMATHA NATH MUKHERJEE versus THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

    Supreme Court of India 11 March 1960 1960 INSC 48 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 245

    Case: PRAMATHA NATH MUKHERJEE versus THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 245] (1960) Section: BODY 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 24:5 beside the point. It was wholly immaterial whether profits were made or losses were incurred in the year, if the employers continued to …

    K.C. Das Gupta, J.C. Shah

  4. THE DELHI CLOTH AND GENERAL MILLS LTD. versus KUSHAL BHAN

    Supreme Court of India 10 March 1960 1960 INSC 47 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 227 Cited by 148

    Case: THE DELHI CLOTH AND GENERAL MILLS LTD. versus KUSHAL BHAN [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 227] (1960) Section: BODY - ... 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS cancel. the decree in regard to the properties covered x960 by t h at the w en h certificate. Section it . s a h 11 appear to t e 10 …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

  5. THE RASHTRIYA MILL MAZDOOR SANGH, PAREL, BOMBAY AND ANOTHER versus THE APOLLO MILLS LIMITED AND OTHERS

    Supreme Court of India 10 March 1960 1960 INSC 46 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 231 Cited by 1

    Case: THE RASHTRIYA MILL MAZDOOR SANGH, PAREL, BOMBAY AND ANOTHER versus THE APOLLO MILLS LIMITED AND OTH... [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 231] (1960) Section: BODY -- - _ _,.'"\ • "' "1"' ..... - 'r 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS THE RASHTRIYA MILL MAZDOOR SANGH, PAREL, BOMBAY AND ANOTHER …

    S.K. Das

  6. M:;S. PEIRCE LESLIE & CO., LTD., KOZHIKODE versus THEIR WORKMEN

    Supreme Court of India 9 March 1960 1960 INSC 42 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 194 Cited by 1

    Case: M:;S. PEIRCE LESLIE & CO., LTD., KOZHIKODE versus THEIR WORKMEN [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 194] (1960) Section: BODY March 9 • 194 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960] M:;S. PEIRCE LESLIE & CO., LTD., KOZHIKODE v. THEIR WORKMEN (P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, K. SuBBA RAO AND K. c. DAS GUP'l'A …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

  7. YELLAPPAGOUDA SHANKARGOUDA PATIL versus BASANGOUDA SHIDDANGOUDA PATIL

    Supreme Court of India 9 March 1960 1960 INSC 45 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 221 Cited by 1

    Case: YELLAPPAGOUDA SHANKARGOUDA PATIL versus BASANGOUDA SHIDDANGOUDA PATIL [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 221] (1960) Section: BODY 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS YELLAPPAGOUDA SHANKARGOUDA PATIL v. BASANGOUDA SHIDDANGOUDA PATIL (P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR and K. N. W ANCHOO, JJ.) Hereditary …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

  8. MANAGEMENT OF VISHNU SUGAR MILLS LIMITED, HARKHUA, DISTRICT SARAN, BIHAR versus THEIR WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY CHINI MILL MAZDOOR UNION, HARKHUA, DIST. SARAN, BIHAR

    Supreme Court of India 9 March 1960 1960 INSC 44 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 214

    Case: MANAGEMENT OF VISHNU SUGAR MILLS LIMITED, HARKHUA, DISTRICT SARAN, BIHAR versus THEIR WORKMEN REPR... [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 214] (1960) Section: BODY 214 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960] based on mere surmises and on mere surmises and mere surmises and and is entirely opposed to …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

  9. TEA DISTRICTS LABOUR ASSOCIATION, CALCUTTA versus EX-EMPLOYEES OF TEA DISTRICTS LABOUR ASSOCIATION AND ANOTHER

    Supreme Court of India 9 March 1960 1960 INSC 43 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 207 Cited by 3

    Case: TEA DISTRICTS LABOUR ASSOCIATION, CALCUTTA versus EX-EMPLOYEES OF TEA DISTRICTS LABOUR ASSOCIATION A... [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 207] (1960) Section: BODY -~ . .,.; . ,.. . 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 207 surplus the Tribunal omitted to take into account the important fact that …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

  10. M/S. U. P. ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO., LTD. versus THE WORKMEN OF M/S. S. N. CHOUDHARY, CONTRACTORS AND ANOTHER

    Supreme Court of India 8 March 1960 1960 INSC 41 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 189 Cited by 1

    Case: M/S. U. P. ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO., LTD. versus THE WORKMEN OF M/S. S. N. CHOUDHARY, CONTRACTORS AND ANO... [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 189] (1960) Section: SECTION 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 189 remedies available to the petitioner for obtaining relief.· It cannot complain of a …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead