All courts — latest judgments

251. THE BIHAR STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

     Supreme Court of India 22 February 1960 1960 INSC 29 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 58 Cited by 1

     Case: THE BIHAR STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 58] (1960) Section: PARAGRAPH [1960] 58 SUPREME COURT REPORTS z960 view of this Mr. Palkiwala for the Managed Company did not press C. A. No. 323 of 1957, which is therefore …

     J.L. Kapur

252. THE TINNEVELLY-TUTICORIN ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. LTD., versus ITS WORKMEN

     Supreme Court of India 22 February 1960 1960 INSC 30 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 68 Cited by 2

     Case: THE TINNEVELLY-TUTICORIN ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. LTD., versus ITS WORKMEN [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 68] (1960) Section: PARAGRAPH 68 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960] one of the objects of the appellant bank is to carry on the general business of banking and therefore subject Bihar State h …

     P.B. Gajendragadkar

253. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY NORTH & OTHERS. versus M/S. HARIVALLABHDAS KALIDAS AND CO.,

     Supreme Court of India 19 February 1960 1960 INSC 28 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 50

     Case: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY NORTH & OTHERS. versus M/S. HARIVALLABHDAS KALIDAS AND CO., [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 50] (1960) Section: PARAGRAPH 50 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960) I960 not in terms, negativing the Crown's contention. I Commissionsr of think that there was …

     S.K. Das

254. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY versus CHANDULAL KESHAVLAL & CO., PETLAD

     Supreme Court of India 17 February 1960 1960 INSC 27 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 38 Cited by 5

     Case: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY versus CHANDULAL KESHAVLAL & CO., PETLAD [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 38] (1960) Section: BODY Febt-ua,..v. t'J SUPREME COURT REPORTS THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY [1960] 38 v. CHANDULAL KESHA VLAL & CO., PETLAD (S. K. DAs, J. L. KAPUR …

     S.K. Das

255. M/S. ROHTAS SUGAR LTD., & OTHERS versus THEIR WORKMEN

     Supreme Court of India 12 February 1960 1960 INSC 25 [1960] 2 S.C.R. 989

     Case: M/S. ROHTAS SUGAR LTD., & OTHERS versus THEIR WORKMEN [[1960] 2 S.C.R. 989] (1960) Section: BODY 989 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS appropriate Government as meaning, in relation to x96v any industrial dispute concerning any industry carried on by or under the authority of …

     P.B. Gajendragadkar

256. THE BIJAY COTTON MILLS LTD. versus THEIR WORKMEN & ANOTHER

     Supreme Court of India 12 February 1960 1960 INSC 26 [1960] 2 S.C.R. 982 Cited by 124

     Case: THE BIJAY COTTON MILLS LTD. versus THEIR WORKMEN & ANOTHER [[1960] 2 S.C.R. 982] (1960) Section: BODY • February 12 • SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960 (2)] THE BIJAY COTTON MILLS LTD. v. THEIR WORKMEN & ANOTHER (P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR AND K. c. DAS GUPTA, JJ.) Industrial …

     P.B. Gajendragadkar

257. SMT. NAGINDRA BALA MITRA AND ANOTHER versus SUNIL CHANDRA ROY AND ANOTHER

     Supreme Court of India 12 February 1960 1960 INSC 24 [1960] 3 S.C.R. 1 Cited by 3

     Case: SMT. NAGINDRA BALA MITRA AND ANOTHER versus SUNIL CHANDRA ROY AND ANOTHER [[1960] 3 S.C.R. 1] (1960) Section: BODY ,. THE ~UPREME COURT REPORTS SMT. NAGINDRA BALA MITRA AND ANOTHER v. SUNIL CHANDRA ROY AND ANOTHER (S. K. DAs, A. K. SARKAR AND M. HrnAYATULLAH. JJ.} Trial by …

     S.K. Das

258. THE ASSOCIATED CEMENT COMPANY LTD. versus SHRI P. D. VYAS AND OTHERS.

     Supreme Court of India 11 February 1960 1960 INSC 23 [1960] 2 S.C.R. 974 Cited by 13

     Case: THE ASSOCIATED CEMENT COMPANY LTD. versus SHRI P. D. VYAS AND OTHERS. [[1960] 2 S.C.R. 974] (1960) Section: BODY • Corporation of the City of Nagpur v. Its Employees Subba Rao ]. z960 February, II • 974 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960 (2)] with industrial departments, is also …

     P.B. Gajendragadkar

259. THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NAGPUR versus ITS EMPLOYEES

     Supreme Court of India 10 February 1960 1960 INSC 22 [1960] 2 S.C.R. 942 Cited by 88

     Case: THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NAGPUR versus ITS EMPLOYEES [[1960] 2 S.C.R. 942] (1960) Section: SECTION • 942 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960(2)] I960 "terminal charges" means "for the provision of" and not" for the user of". S. S. Light Railway Co. Ltd. The necessary …

     P.B. Gajendragadkar

260. S.S. LIGHT RAILWAY CO., LTD. versus UPPERDOAB SUGAR MILLS LTD. & ANOTHER

     Supreme Court of India 9 February 1960 1960 INSC 21 [1960] 2 S.C.R. 926 Cited by 5

     Case: S.S. LIGHT RAILWAY CO., LTD. versus UPPERDOAB SUGAR MILLS LTD. & ANOTHER [[1960] 2 S.C.R. 926] (1960) Section: SECTION • 926 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1960 (2)] a substantial question of law arose in the case and that it was 1voll within the powers of the Labour Appellate …

     P.B. Gajendragadkar