Filter results by 2

Courts

Judges in the latest 29

Years

Decided between

1961-01-01 and 1961-12-31 · clear

Clear all filters

All courts — latest judgments

1–10 of 29 judgments, newest first (0.14 seconds)

  1. M/S. GEORGE OAKES (P.) LTD. versus STATE OF MADRAS

    Supreme Court of India 28 April 1961 1961 INSC 195 [1962] 2 S.C.R. 570 Cited by 10

    Case: M/S. GEORGE OAKES (P.) LTD. versus STATE OF MADRAS [[1962] 2 S.C.R. 570] (1962) Section: BODY 570 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1962] r961 hearing cases would refer the matter for the decision of a Full Court,. In the result these appeals are Jaisri v Sahu a owe 11 tl an d 1 1 …

    T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar

  2. JAISRI SAHU versus RAJDEWAN DUBEY AND OTHERS

    Supreme Court of India 28 April 1961 1961 INSC 198 [1962] 2 S.C.R. 558 Cited by 250

    Case: JAISRI SAHU versus RAJDEWAN DUBEY AND OTHERS [[1962] 2 S.C.R. 558] (1962) Section: BODY 1961 Nilkanlha SAidramappa Ningashetti v. l(ashinath Somanna NingashetH RaghubaY Dayal }· iy6 r April a8. SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1962) 558 praying for the setting aside of the award, no …

    T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar

  3. RANA SHEO AMBAR SINGH versus ALLAHABAD BANK LTD., ALLAHABAD

    Supreme Court of India 27 April 1961 1961 INSC 192 [1962] 2 S.C.R. 441 Cited by 13

    Case: RANA SHEO AMBAR SINGH versus ALLAHABAD BANK LTD., ALLAHABAD [[1962] 2 S.C.R. 441] (1962) Section: BODY 2 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS RANA SHEO AMBAR SINGH v. ALLAHABAD BANK LTD., ALLAHABAD (P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, K. N. w ANCHOO, K. C. DAS GuPT4 and T. L. VENKATARAMA AIYAR …

    T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar

  4. RANGILAL CHOUDHURY versus DAHU SAO AND OTHERS

    Supreme Court of India 26 April 1961 1961 INSC 185 [1962] 2 S.C.R. 401 Cited by 3

    Case: RANGILAL CHOUDHURY versus DAHU SAO AND OTHERS [[1962] 2 S.C.R. 401] (1962) Section: SECTION 2 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 401 had two incised wounds and one punctured wound '9[61 ]and two abrasions. The mere fact that Kartar Singh Rarta• Singh was not connected with the …

    T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar

  5. M/S. HARINAGAR SUGAR MILLS LTD. versus SHYAM SUNDAR JHUNJHUNWALA AND OTHERS

    Supreme Court of India 25 April 1961 1961 INSC 180 [1962] 2 S.C.R. 339 Cited by 146

    Case: M/S. HARINAGAR SUGAR MILLS LTD. versus SHYAM SUNDAR JHUNJHUNWALA AND OTHERS [[1962] 2 S.C.R. 339] (1962) Section: CONCLUSION 2 s.c.R. SUPREME COUHT HE.PORTS M/S. HARINAGAR SUGAR MILLS LTD. v. SHYAM SUNDAR JHUNJHUNW ALA AND OTHERS (S. K. DAS, J. L. KAPUR, M. HIDAYATULLAH …

    T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar

  6. CHANDI PRASAD CHOKHANI versus THE STATE OF BIHAR

    Supreme Court of India 24 April 1961 1961 INSC 173 [1962] 2 S.C.R. 276 Cited by 7

    Case: CHANDI PRASAD CHOKHANI versus THE STATE OF BIHAR [[1962] 2 S.C.R. 276] (1962) Section: PARAGRAPH 276 SUPREME COURT REPORTS Ll962] r96r municipal law different High Courts seem to have taken the view that Magistrates entertaining recovery c DMgahA. proceedings under the …

    T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar

  7. THE DARGAH COMMITTEE, AJMER versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN

    Supreme Court of India 24 April 1961 1961 INSC 176 [1962] 2 S.C.R. 265

    Case: THE DARGAH COMMITTEE, AJMER versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN [[1962] 2 S.C.R. 265] (1962) Section: BODY 2 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 265 to murder even although this completed act would not, unless followed by the other acts, result in kil-ling. It might be the beginning of the …

    T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar

  8. SHAH BHOJRAJ KUVERJI OIL MILLS AND GINNING FACTORY versus SUBBASH CHANDRA YOGRAJ SINHA

    Supreme Court of India 21 April 1961 1961 INSC 168 [1962] 2 S.C.R. 159 Cited by 273

    Case: SHAH BHOJRAJ KUVERJI OIL MILLS AND GINNING FACTORY versus SUBBASH CHANDRA YOGRAJ SINHA [[1962] 2 S.C.R. 159] (1962) Section: PARAGRAPH 159 2 S.C.lt. SUPREME COURt REPORTS · "Were the evacuee to come back he could demand 1961 961 1 to take possession of the siteJ and so it …

    T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar

  9. CARL STILL G. M. B. H. & ANOTHER versus THE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS

    Supreme Court of India 19 April 1961 1961 INSC 161 [1962] 2 S.C.R. 81 Cited by 2

    Case: CARL STILL G. M. B. H. & ANOTHER versus THE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS [[1962] 2 S.C.R. 81] (1962) Section: PARAGRAPH 2 S.C.R. SUPR:ffiME COURT Rll:POR1'S quote what we said in Sahi's case (supra), remarkable for their disturbing implications. For these reasons, we allow …

    T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar

  10. PANDIT KISHAN LAL versus GANPAT RAM KHOSLA AND ANOTHER

    Supreme Court of India 17 April 1961 1961 INSC 155 [1962] 2 S.C.R. 17

    Case: PANDIT KISHAN LAL versus GANPAT RAM KHOSLA AND ANOTHER [[1962] 2 S.C.R. 17] (1962) Section: PARAGRAPH .,. 2 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS PANDIT KISH AN LAL v. GANP AT RAM KHOSLA AND ANOTHER (S. K. DAS, J. L. L. KAPUR, M. HIDAYATULLAH, (S. K. DAS, J. L. L. KAPUR, M. …

    T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead