Filter results by 1

Courts

Judges in the latest 300

Years

Decided between

1961-01-01 and 1961-12-31 · clear

Clear all filters

All courts — latest judgments

191–200 of 366 judgments, newest first (0.06 seconds)

  1. CHANDI PRASAD CHOKHANI versus THE STATE OF BIHAR

    Supreme Court of India 24 April 1961 1961 INSC 173 [1962] 2 S.C.R. 276 Cited by 7

    Case: CHANDI PRASAD CHOKHANI versus THE STATE OF BIHAR [[1962] 2 S.C.R. 276] (1962) Section: PARAGRAPH 276 SUPREME COURT REPORTS Ll962] r96r municipal law different High Courts seem to have taken the view that Magistrates entertaining recovery c DMgahA. proceedings under the …

    T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar

  2. GURU DATTA SHARMA versus STATE OF BIHAR

    Supreme Court of India 24 April 1961 1961 INSC 174 [1962] 2 S.C.R. 292 Cited by 5

    Case: GURU DATTA SHARMA versus STATE OF BIHAR [[1962] 2 S.C.R. 292] (1962) Section: BODY I96I April z4. ' GURU DATTA SHARMA v. STATE OF BIHAR (B. P. SINHA, c. J., A. K. SARKAR, K. c. DAS GUPTA, N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGARand J. R. MuDHOLKAR, JJ.) Forest-Protection-V olidity of …

    Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha

  3. ABHAYANAND MISHRA versus THE STATE OF BIHAR

    Supreme Court of India 24 April 1961 1961 INSC 178 [1962] 2 S.C.R. 241 Cited by 11

    Case: ABHAYANAND MISHRA versus THE STATE OF BIHAR [[1962] 2 S.C.R. 241] (1962) Section: BODY 2 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 241 they were all consistent with his innocence. Though some of the findings give rise to suspicion, we cannot say that the High Court was wrong in holding …

    K. Subba Rao

  4. OM PRAKASH versus THE STATE OF PUNJAB

    Supreme Court of India 24 April 1961 1961 INSC 179 [1962] 2 S.C.R. 254 Cited by 1

    Case: OM PRAKASH versus THE STATE OF PUNJAB [[1962] 2 S.C.R. 254] (1962) Section: BODY t96I April a4. 254 SUPREME COURT REPORTS OM PARKASH v. THE STATE OF PUNJAB (K. SUBBA RAO and RAGHUBAR DAYAL, JJ.) Criminal Law-Attempt to murder-Accused attempting to starve a person gradually …

    K. Subba Rao

  5. THE DARGAH COMMITTEE, AJMER versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN

    Supreme Court of India 24 April 1961 1961 INSC 176 [1962] 2 S.C.R. 265

    Case: THE DARGAH COMMITTEE, AJMER versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN [[1962] 2 S.C.R. 265] (1962) Section: BODY 2 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 265 to murder even although this completed act would not, unless followed by the other acts, result in kil-ling. It might be the beginning of the …

    T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar

  6. MAJOR E. G. BARSY versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY

    Supreme Court of India 24 April 1961 1961 INSC 177 [1962] 2 S.C.R. 195 Cited by 225

    Case: MAJOR E. G. BARSY versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY [[1962] 2 S.C.R. 195] (1962) Section: SECTION 2 $.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 195 1952, was a competent and legal order and no excep-tion can be taken to it. We would, therefore, allow the appeal and set aside the order of the …

    K. Subba Rao

  7. DAJI KRISHNAJI DESAI TAMBULKAR versus GANESH VISHNU KULKARNI AND OTHERS

    Supreme Court of India 22 April 1961 1961 INSC 172 [1962] 1 S.C.R. 905

    Case: DAJI KRISHNAJI DESAI TAMBULKAR versus GANESH VISHNU KULKARNI AND OTHERS [[1962] 1 S.C.R. 905] (1962) Section: BODY l S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 905 not been established that the Chief Customs Authority made its order under s. 190 of the Act with the con-sent of the …

    K. Subba Rao

  8. ABDUL GAFOOR versus STATE OF MYSORE

    Supreme Court of India 22 April 1961 1961 INSC 171 [1962] 1 S.C.R. 909 Cited by 1

    Case: ABDUL GAFOOR versus STATE OF MYSORE [[1962] 1 S.C.R. 909] (1962) Section: BODY 909 1 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS respondent no. l's predecessor-in-interest was not r96r avoided by the khot, and therefore validly conveyed .. , . .. tit · I e to h" 1m. C onsequent y no I t1 …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

  9. GORKHA RAM AND OTHERS versus THE CUSTODIAN GENERAL OF INDIA, DELHI

    Supreme Court of India 21 April 1961 1961 INSC 170 [1962] 2 S.C.R. 151

    Case: GORKHA RAM AND OTHERS versus THE CUSTODIAN GENERAL OF INDIA, DELHI [[1962] 2 S.C.R. 151] (1962) Section: BODY 151 2 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS contains a non obstante clause on the same lines as I96I s. 38 of the Rent Control Act. The result therefore would be that the …

    K. Subba Rao

  10. SHAH BHOJRAJ KUVERJI OIL MILLS AND GINNING FACTORY versus SUBBASH CHANDRA YOGRAJ SINHA

    Supreme Court of India 21 April 1961 1961 INSC 168 [1962] 2 S.C.R. 159 Cited by 273

    Case: SHAH BHOJRAJ KUVERJI OIL MILLS AND GINNING FACTORY versus SUBBASH CHANDRA YOGRAJ SINHA [[1962] 2 S.C.R. 159] (1962) Section: PARAGRAPH 159 2 S.C.lt. SUPREME COURt REPORTS · "Were the evacuee to come back he could demand 1961 961 1 to take possession of the siteJ and so it …

    T.L. Venkatarama Aiyyar

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead