Filter precedents
1
Reset allBench: P.B. Gajendragadkar
Case: SATINDER SINGH AND OTHERS versus AMRAO SINGH AND OTHERS. [[1961] 3 S.C.R. 676] (1961) Section: BODY 676 (1961] SUPREME COURT REPORTS ' [96]' judgment in C. A. No. 416 of 1958 (Standard Vacuum Burmalo-Shlll Refining Co., Ltd. versUIJ Its Workmen) the compo-R•ftneri" Limil•a …
Bench: P.B. Gajendragadkar
Case: THE BURMAH-SHELL REFINERIES LIMITED versus THEIR WORKMEN [[1961] 3 S.C.R. 669] (1961) Section: BODY 3.S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS THE BURMAH-SHELL REFINERIES LIMITED . "· THEIR WORKMEN. (P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, K. N. WANCHOo a.nd K. C. DAS Gul'TA, JJ.) Industrial …
Bench: J.L. Kapur
Case: V. R. SUBRAMANYAM versus B. THAYAPPA AND OTHERS. [[1961] 3 S.C.R. 663] (1961) Section: BODY I I 3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS V. R. SUBRAMANYAM v. B. THAYAPPA AND OTHERS. (J. L. KAPUR and J. C. SHAH, JJ.) B11ilding contract-Defective work-Addition•! work not covered by …
Bench: J.L. Kapur
Case: GOVERNOR GENERAL IN COUNCIL versus MUSADDI LAL [[1961] 3 S.C.R. 647] (1961) Section: SECTION r 647 interest pendente lite until realisation, the appeals shall stand dismissed. In view of the substantial failure of the appeals, the appellant shall pay the costs· in this …
Bench: J.L. Kapur
Case: MAHABIR PRASHAD RUNGTA versus DURGA DATT. [[1961] 3 S.C.R. 639] (1961) Section: BODY '9[[6]]' not even purport to be for legal necessity. Therefore, '9[[6]]' in our opinion, the conclusion is inescapable that the Subbu C/utty's· impugned transfer is not justified by legal …
Bench: P.B. Gajendragadkar
Case: THE ORIOL INDUSTRIES LTD. versus THE BOMBAY MERCANTILE BANK LTD [[1961] 3 S.C.R. 652] (1961) Section: BODY Governor·General in Council v. Musaddi Lal Shah]. January JI. 652 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1961) of the Limitation Act upon ss. 72. and 77 of the Rail-ways Act and to …
Bench: Syed Jaffer Imam
Case: ARDESHIR H. BHIWANDIWALA versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY [[1961] 3 S.C.R. 592] (1961) Section: BODY 592 taking a torch with him, access to the house of the x96x deceased being obtained by stealth by scaling over a 5 1 Madh;:'•;.adesh wall. Then again, there was the mood of …
Bench: J.L. Kapur
Case: VALLABHDAS AND OTHERS versus MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, AKOLA. [[1961] 3 S.C.R. 618] (1961) Section: BODY 618 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1961] '96' Judge nor the High Court has given a finding on that Pioneer Motors point, it is necessary to remit the case to the High (PYivate) Ltd. …
Bench: J.L. Kapur
Case: THE PIONEER MOTORS (PRIVATE) LTD versus THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, NAGERCOIL. [[1961] 3 S.C.R. 609] (1961) Section: BODY of the word "factory " and that the appellant has '9[6]' been rightly convicted of the offence of working the A~-;,. factory without obtaining a licence. We …
Bench: A.K. Sarkar
Case: STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH versus AHMAD ULLAH. [[1961] 3 S.C.R. 583] (1961) Section: BODY 3 S.C.R.. SUPREME COURT REPORTS the solicitor for the respondent called upon the appel-lant to execute the documents they were not bound to do so. We are unable to accord our assent to …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault