All courts — latest judgments

1. SAIT NAGJEE PURUSHOTHAM AND CO. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS

   Supreme Court of India 20 December 1963 1963 INSC 267 [1964] 6 S.C.R. 91

   Case: SAIT NAGJEE PURUSHOTHAM AND CO. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 91] (1964) Section: BODY • tained allegations only as regards 6 and not as regards the rest. This would mean that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to find that more than 6 votes had …

   A.K. Sarkar

2. VIDYACHARAN SHUKLA versus KHUBCHAND BAGHEL AND OTHERS

   Supreme Court of India 20 December 1963 1963 INSC 266 [1964] 6 S.C.R. 129 Cited by 81

   Case: VIDYACHARAN SHUKLA versus KHUBCHAND BAGHEL AND OTHERS [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 129] (1964) Section: BODY ORDER BY COURT . In accordance with the opinion of the majority the appeals are dismissed with costs. VIDY ACHARAN SHUKLA 11. KHUBCHAND BAGHEL AND OTHERS (B. P. SINHA, C.J., K. …

   Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha

3. PODAR PLASTICS(P) LTD versus ITS WORKMEN

   Supreme Court of India 19 December 1963 1963 INSC 265 [1964] 6 S.C.R. 15

   Case: PODAR PLASTICS(P) LTD versus ITS WORKMEN [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 15] (1964) Section: BODY 6 S.C.R. . SUPREME COURT REPORTS action was in two parts and that what the father gifted was the money and not the property. It would be indeed an 1963 Kanakaral>J-nammal ..i; artificial way …

   P.B. Gajendragadkar

4. STATE OF BHOPAL AND ORS. versus CHAMPALAL AND ORS.

   Supreme Court of India 19 December 1963 1963 INSC 261 [1964] 6 S.C.R. 35 Cited by 2

   Case: STATE OF BHOPAL AND ORS. versus CHAMPALAL AND ORS. [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 35] (1964) Section: BODY assuming that the appropriate Government acts honestly J96J and bona fide. If the appropriate Government refuses to -80"'i~!i't:: make a reference for irrelevant considerations, or …

   Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha, K.N. Wanchoo, Raghubar Dayal and others

5. BOMBAY UNION OF JOURNALISTS & ORS. versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY & ANR.

   Supreme Court of India 19 December 1963 1963 INSC 263 [1964] 6 S.C.R. 22 Cited by 272

   Case: BOMBAY UNION OF JOURNALISTS & ORS. versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY & ANR. [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 22] (1964) Section: BODY 196J 196J justify his claim for rehabilitation and the Tribunal is in-Podar Pla.<tics (P) clined to reject the evidence which has been adduced, the Ltd. Tribunal …

   P.B. Gajendragadkar

6. STATE BANK OF INDIA versus M. SELVARAJ DANIEL

   Supreme Court of India 19 December 1963 1963 INSC 264 [1964] 3 S.C.R. 280

   Case: STATE BANK OF INDIA versus M. SELVARAJ DANIEL [[1964] 3 S.C.R. 280] (1964) Section: SECTION 1965 M. Stfr;eraj Daniel ... Motta111111nt of ~l•le B•nk of /ndi• Dos Go;I• J, IMS 280 entitled to Rs. 146/- plus dearness allowance as the benefit to ".Vhich he is entitle~ under …

   P.B. Gajendragadkar

7. JABAR SINGH versus GENDA LAL

   Supreme Court of India 19 December 1963 1963 INSC 262 [1964] 6 S.C.R. 54 Cited by 34

   Case: JABAR SINGH versus GENDA LAL [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 54] (1964) Section: BODY 1961 Dec1mber, 19 SUPREME COURT REPORTS JABAR SINGH v. GENDA LAL (P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, A. K. SARKAR, K. N. WANCHOO, K. C. DAS GUPTA AND N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR JJ.) Representation of the People Act (43 …

   P.B. Gajendragadkar

8. RAMNARAYAN MOR AND ANOTHER versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

   Supreme Court of India 16 December 1963 1963 INSC 257 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 1064 Cited by 1

   Case: RAMNARAYAN MOR AND ANOTHER versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 1064] (1964) Section: BODY RAMNARA YAN MOR AND ANOTHER 1963 v. v. December 16 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (B.P. SINHA, C.J., K. SUBBA RAO, M. HIDAYATULLAH, J.C. SHAH .AND N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR JJ.) JJ.) and …

   Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha

9. R. RATILAL & CO. versus NATIONAL SECURITY ASSURANCE CO. LTD.

   Supreme Court of India 16 December 1963 1963 INSC 259 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 1047

   Case: R. RATILAL & CO. versus NATIONAL SECURITY ASSURANCE CO. LTD. [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 1047] (1964) Section: SECTION 1047 5 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS Jaw. It would, we think, be inappropriate for the High Court exercising its writ jurisdiction to consider the evidetice for …

   A.K. Sarkar

10. T. PREM SAGAR versus THE STANDARD VACUUM OIL COMPANY MADRAS AND OTHERS

    Supreme Court of India 16 December 1963 1963 INSC 260 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 1030 Cited by 55

    Case: T. PREM SAGAR versus THE STANDARD VACUUM OIL COMPANY MADRAS AND OTHERS [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 1030] (1964) Section: BODY [1964) 1030 SUPREME COVRT REPORTS }Jl6J T. PREM SAGAR v • THE STANDARD VACUUM OIL COMPANY MADRAS AND OJHERS . December 16 (P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR AND K.C. DAS …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar