All courts — latest judgments

1. SAIT NAGJEE PURUSHOTHAM AND CO. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS

   Supreme Court of India 20 December 1963 1963 INSC 267 [1964] 6 S.C.R. 91

   Case: SAIT NAGJEE PURUSHOTHAM AND CO. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 91] (1964) Section: BODY • tained allegations only as regards 6 and not as regards the rest. This would mean that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to find that more than 6 votes had …

   A.K. Sarkar

2. R. RATILAL & CO. versus NATIONAL SECURITY ASSURANCE CO. LTD.

   Supreme Court of India 16 December 1963 1963 INSC 259 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 1047

   Case: R. RATILAL & CO. versus NATIONAL SECURITY ASSURANCE CO. LTD. [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 1047] (1964) Section: SECTION 1047 5 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS Jaw. It would, we think, be inappropriate for the High Court exercising its writ jurisdiction to consider the evidetice for …

   A.K. Sarkar

3. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION LTD. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DELHI & RAJASTHAN

   Supreme Court of India 9 December 1963 1963 INSC 250 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 880 Cited by 1

   Case: LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION LTD. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DELHI & RAJASTHAN [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 880] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH 880 [1964] 1963 issued. There can be little doubt that if a decision --of a quasi-judicial Tribunal is challenged before the Sri Rama Vilas …

   A.K. Sarkar

4. STATE OF GUJARAT versus JETHALAL CHELABHAI PATEL

   Supreme Court of India 6 December 1963 1963 INSC 248 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 801

   Case: STATE OF GUJARAT versus JETHALAL CHELABHAI PATEL [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 801] (1964) Section: FACTS SUPREME COURT REPORTS . STATE OF GUJARAT v. JETHALAL CHELABHAI PATEL (A.K. SARKAR AND K.N. WANCHOO, JJ.) Factories Act, 1948 (63 of 1948), ss. 2l{l)(iv)(c), 92, 101-Dangerous …

   A.K. Sarkar, K.N. Wanchoo

5. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY versus JAMES ANDERSON

   Supreme Court of India 2 December 1963 1963 INSC 238 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 590

   Case: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY versus JAMES ANDERSON [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 590] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH [1964) 590 SUPREME COURT REPORTS 1963 argument, in our opinion, is not well-conceived. The whole object of the Act is to save ignorant people Dr. Yash Pal from being …

   A.K. Sarkar

6. N.A. MALBARI AND BROS. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY

   Supreme Court of India 25 November 1963 1963 INSC 233 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 560

   Case: N.A. MALBARI AND BROS. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 560] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH (1964] 1963 pute must be governed by Rule S(a)(i) of the respon-dent's Standing Orders. Workmen of Dewan Tea In the result, we reverse the finding of the …

   A.K. Sarkar

7. THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF MADRAS versus J. S. BASAPPA

   Supreme Court of India 20 November 1963 1963 INSC 231 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 517 Cited by 2

   Case: THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF MADRAS versus J. S. BASAPPA [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 517] (1964) Section: CONCLUSION THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF MADRAS V. J. S. BASAPPA (A.K. SARKAR, M. HIDAYATULLAH AND J.C. SHAH, JJ.) Juri:Jdiction of Civil Courts-Statute conferring finality of …

   A.K. Sarkar

8. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, HYDERABAD versus SRI RAJAREDDY MALLARAM

   Supreme Court of India 20 November 1963 1963 INSC 230 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 508

   Case: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, HYDERABAD versus SRI RAJAREDDY MALLARAM [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 508] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH 508 SUPREME COURT REPORTS . [1964) 1963 the partners and therefore on him. The partnership agreement did not speak of market value or fair Jivarajbhai value. …

   A.K. Sarkar

9. JIVARAJBHAI UJAMSHI SHETH AND OTHERS versus CHINTAMANRAO BALAJI AND OTHERS

   Supreme Court of India 19 November 1963 1963 INSC 229 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 480 Cited by 84

   Case: JIVARAJBHAI UJAMSHI SHETH AND OTHERS versus CHINTAMANRAO BALAJI AND OTHERS [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 480] (1964) Section: BODY I would therefore dismiss the appeal. 1963 ORDER R.P. Kapur Y. Union of India In accordance with the opinion of the majority and Anr. the appeal is allowed …

   A.K. Sarkar

10. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PUNJAB versus INDIAN WOOLLEN TEXTILE MILLS

    Supreme Court of India 18 November 1963 1963 INSC 227 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 427

    Case: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PUNJAB versus INDIAN WOOLLEN TEXTILE MILLS [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 427] (1964) Section: CONCLUSION 5 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PUNJAB v. INDIAN WOOLLEN TEXTILE MILLS (A.K. SARKAR, M. HIDAYATULLAH AND J.C. SHAH, JJ.) …

    A.K. Sarkar