Filter results by 2
Courts
Judges in the latest 117
- P.B. Gajendragadkar117
- K.N. Wanchoo6
- K.C. Das Gupta5
- N. Rajagopala Ayyangar3
- S.K. Das2
- A.K. Sarkar2
- M. Hidayatullah2
- J.C. Shah2
Years
Decided between
All courts — latest judgments
1–10 of 117 judgments, newest first (0.16 seconds)
-
PODAR PLASTICS(P) LTD versus ITS WORKMEN
Supreme Court of India 19 December 1963 1963 INSC 265 [1964] 6 S.C.R. 15
Case: PODAR PLASTICS(P) LTD versus ITS WORKMEN [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 15] (1964) Section: BODY 6 S.C.R. . SUPREME COURT REPORTS action was in two parts and that what the father gifted was the money and not the property. It would be indeed an 1963 Kanakaral>J-nammal ..i; artificial way …
P.B. Gajendragadkar
-
BOMBAY UNION OF JOURNALISTS & ORS. versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY & ANR.
Supreme Court of India 19 December 1963 1963 INSC 263 [1964] 6 S.C.R. 22 Cited by 273
Case: BOMBAY UNION OF JOURNALISTS & ORS. versus THE STATE OF BOMBAY & ANR. [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 22] (1964) Section: BODY 196J 196J justify his claim for rehabilitation and the Tribunal is in-Podar Pla.<tics (P) clined to reject the evidence which has been adduced, the Ltd. Tribunal …
P.B. Gajendragadkar
-
STATE BANK OF INDIA versus M. SELVARAJ DANIEL
Supreme Court of India 19 December 1963 1963 INSC 264 [1964] 3 S.C.R. 280
Case: STATE BANK OF INDIA versus M. SELVARAJ DANIEL [[1964] 3 S.C.R. 280] (1964) Section: SECTION 1965 M. Stfr;eraj Daniel ... Motta111111nt of ~l•le B•nk of /ndi• Dos Go;I• J, IMS 280 entitled to Rs. 146/- plus dearness allowance as the benefit to ".Vhich he is entitle~ under …
P.B. Gajendragadkar
-
JABAR SINGH versus GENDA LAL
Supreme Court of India 19 December 1963 1963 INSC 262 [1964] 6 S.C.R. 54 Cited by 34
Case: JABAR SINGH versus GENDA LAL [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 54] (1964) Section: BODY 1961 Dec1mber, 19 SUPREME COURT REPORTS JABAR SINGH v. GENDA LAL (P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, A. K. SARKAR, K. N. WANCHOO, K. C. DAS GUPTA AND N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR JJ.) Representation of the People Act (43 …
P.B. Gajendragadkar
-
T. PREM SAGAR versus THE STANDARD VACUUM OIL COMPANY MADRAS AND OTHERS
Supreme Court of India 16 December 1963 1963 INSC 260 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 1030 Cited by 55
Case: T. PREM SAGAR versus THE STANDARD VACUUM OIL COMPANY MADRAS AND OTHERS [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 1030] (1964) Section: BODY [1964) 1030 SUPREME COVRT REPORTS }Jl6J T. PREM SAGAR v • THE STANDARD VACUUM OIL COMPANY MADRAS AND OJHERS . December 16 (P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR AND K.C. DAS …
P.B. Gajendragadkar
-
THE STATE OF PUNJAB versus S. RATTAN SINGH
Supreme Court of India 16 December 1963 1963 INSC 258 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 1098 Cited by 3
Case: THE STATE OF PUNJAB versus S. RATTAN SINGH [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 1098] (1964) Section: BODY 1963 Ramnarayan Mor and another v. State of Maharashtra Ayyangar J. 1963 December 16 [1964] 1098 SUPREME COURT REPORTS by reference to unproved, untested and possibly inad-missible …
P.B. Gajendragadkar
-
KHYERBARI TEA CO. LTD. &ANR. versus THE STATE OF ASSAM
Supreme Court of India 13 December 1963 1963 INSC 255 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 975 Cited by 529
Case: KHYERBARI TEA CO. LTD. &ANR. versus THE STATE OF ASSAM [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 975] (1964) Section: SECTION 975 5 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS KHYERBARI TEA CO. LTD. &ANR. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM (P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, A.K. SARKAR, K.N. WANCHOO, K.C. DAs GUPTA AND N. RAJAGOPA1'A …
P.B. Gajendragadkar
-
MATHURI AND ORS. versus STATE OF PUNJAB
Supreme Court of India 11 December 1963 1963 INSC 253 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 916 Cited by 4
Case: MATHURI AND ORS. versus STATE OF PUNJAB [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 916] (1964) Section: BODY [1964] 916 SUPREME COURT REPORTS J963 We have therefore come to the conclusion that . -even if the Trial Court was right in thinking that V.R. Sadagopa Padmavathi was a Brahmin girl and not …
P.B. Gajendragadkar
-
SRI RAMA VILAS SERVICE (P) LTD. versus C. CHANDRASEKARAN & ORS
Supreme Court of India 9 December 1963 1963 INSC 251 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 869 Cited by 4
Case: SRI RAMA VILAS SERVICE (P) LTD. versus C. CHANDRASEKARAN & ORS [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 869] (1964) Section: SECTION latdar would declare the transfer to be invalid in case 1963 -the transferee failed to pay the penalty. The pro-visions of s. 84A brought the matter of validity or …
P.B. Gajendragadkar
-
BURN AND COMPANY LTD. versus ITS WORKMEN
Supreme Court of India 6 December 1963 1963 INSC 249 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 823
Case: BURN AND COMPANY LTD. versus ITS WORKMEN [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 823] (1964) Section: BODY SUPREME COURT REPORTS In the result we answer the question framed 1963 thus: The rent from the building will be computed separately from the income from the furniture and Sultan Brothers …
P.B. Gajendragadkar