All courts — latest judgments

11. THE STATE OF PUNJAB versus S. RATTAN SINGH

    Supreme Court of India 16 December 1963 1963 INSC 258 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 1098 Cited by 3

    Case: THE STATE OF PUNJAB versus S. RATTAN SINGH [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 1098] (1964) Section: BODY 1963 Ramnarayan Mor and another v. State of Maharashtra Ayyangar J. 1963 December 16 [1964] 1098 SUPREME COURT REPORTS by reference to unproved, untested and possibly inad-missible …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

12. ARJUN SINGH versus MOHINDRA KUMAR & ORS.

    Supreme Court of India 13 December 1963 1963 INSC 256 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 946 Cited by 731

    Case: ARJUN SINGH versus MOHINDRA KUMAR & ORS. [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 946] (1964) Section: BODY 946 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1964] :1963 It is · clear therefore that the discretion to be -exercised by the military officer specified in s. 125 Ram Sarup of the Act as to the trial of …

    Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha

13. KHYERBARI TEA CO. LTD. &ANR. versus THE STATE OF ASSAM

    Supreme Court of India 13 December 1963 1963 INSC 255 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 975 Cited by 529

    Case: KHYERBARI TEA CO. LTD. &ANR. versus THE STATE OF ASSAM [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 975] (1964) Section: SECTION 975 5 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS KHYERBARI TEA CO. LTD. &ANR. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM (P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, A.K. SARKAR, K.N. WANCHOO, K.C. DAs GUPTA AND N. RAJAGOPA1'A …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

14. RAM SARUP versus UNION OF LNDIA AND ANOTHER

    Supreme Court of India 12 December 1963 1963 INSC 254 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 931 Cited by 31

    Case: RAM SARUP versus UNION OF LNDIA AND ANOTHER [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 931] (1964) Section: SECTION 5 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS been in custody for about 10 months before that. 1963 On a consideration of all the circumstances of the -.-case we reduce the sentenc1! on these …

    Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha

15. MATHURI AND ORS. versus STATE OF PUNJAB

    Supreme Court of India 11 December 1963 1963 INSC 253 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 916 Cited by 4

    Case: MATHURI AND ORS. versus STATE OF PUNJAB [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 916] (1964) Section: BODY [1964] 916 SUPREME COURT REPORTS J963 We have therefore come to the conclusion that . -even if the Trial Court was right in thinking that V.R. Sadagopa Padmavathi was a Brahmin girl and not …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

16. BHUSAWAL BOROUGH MUNICIPALITY versus AMALGAMATED ELECTRICITY CO. LTD. & ANR.

    Supreme Court of India 10 December 1963 1963 INSC 252 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 905

    Case: BHUSAWAL BOROUGH MUNICIPALITY versus AMALGAMATED ELECTRICITY CO. LTD. & ANR. [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 905] (1964) Section: BODY - , I Cases under the former rule 30 cannot be used as 1963 precedents because the present rule 3(b' has been -materially altered by the addition of the …

    Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha

17. SRI RAMA VILAS SERVICE (P) LTD. versus C. CHANDRASEKARAN & ORS

    Supreme Court of India 9 December 1963 1963 INSC 251 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 869 Cited by 4

    Case: SRI RAMA VILAS SERVICE (P) LTD. versus C. CHANDRASEKARAN & ORS [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 869] (1964) Section: SECTION latdar would declare the transfer to be invalid in case 1963 -the transferee failed to pay the penalty. The pro-visions of s. 84A brought the matter of validity or …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

18. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION LTD. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DELHI & RAJASTHAN

    Supreme Court of India 9 December 1963 1963 INSC 250 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 880 Cited by 1

    Case: LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION LTD. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DELHI & RAJASTHAN [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 880] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH 880 [1964] 1963 issued. There can be little doubt that if a decision --of a quasi-judicial Tribunal is challenged before the Sri Rama Vilas …

    A.K. Sarkar

19. SULTAN BROTHERS (P) LTD. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

    Supreme Court of India 6 December 1963 1963 INSC 245 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 807 Cited by 13

    Case: SULTAN BROTHERS (P) LTD. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 807] (1964) Section: BODY 807 . 5 S.C.R. . SUPREME COURT REPORTS to see' that the fence which under the Act it was his 1963 duty to see was kept in position all along had not -'.-. been . removed. …

    Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha

20. BURN AND COMPANY LTD. versus ITS WORKMEN

    Supreme Court of India 6 December 1963 1963 INSC 249 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 823

    Case: BURN AND COMPANY LTD. versus ITS WORKMEN [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 823] (1964) Section: BODY SUPREME COURT REPORTS In the result we answer the question framed 1963 thus: The rent from the building will be computed separately from the income from the furniture and Sultan Brothers …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar