All courts — latest judgments

31. V.R. SADAGOPA NAIDU versus BAKTHAVATSALAM & ANR.

    Supreme Court of India 1 December 1963 1963 INSC 237 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 911

    Case: V.R. SADAGOPA NAIDU versus BAKTHAVATSALAM & ANR. [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 911] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH iary value but is one upon which the claim of the respondent no. 1 for the surcharge is based. Mis-construction of such a document would thus be an error of law and the High …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

32. MANIPUR ADMINISTRATION versus M. NILA CHANDRA SINGH

    Supreme Court of India 29 November 1963 1963 INSC 235 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 574 Cited by 14

    Case: MANIPUR ADMINISTRATION versus M. NILA CHANDRA SINGH [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 574] (1964) Section: BODY 1963 November 29 MANIPUR ADMINISTRATION ]I. M. NILA CHANDRA SINGH (P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR AND K.C. DAS GUPTA JJ.) Manipur Foodgrains Dealers Licensing Order, 1958 els. 2(a), 3(1) & …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

33. DR. YASH PAL SAHI versus DELHI ADMINISTRATION

    Supreme Court of India 29 November 1963 1963 INSC 236 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 582

    Case: DR. YASH PAL SAHI versus DELHI ADMINISTRATION [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 582] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH 1963 It appears that cl. 3(2) may have been deliberately worded so as to raise a limited presumption in order to Manipur exclude cases of cultivators who may on occasions …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

34. MCLEOD AND COMPANY LTD. versus WORKMEN

    Supreme Court of India 29 November 1963 1963 INSC 234 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 568

    Case: MCLEOD AND COMPANY LTD. versus WORKMEN [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 568] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH SUPREME COURT REPORTS 1963 his explanation on March 11, 1952. That notice was not concerned with any concealment that came N.A. Malbari to light from the production of the books on …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

35. N.A. MALBARI AND BROS. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY

    Supreme Court of India 25 November 1963 1963 INSC 233 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 560

    Case: N.A. MALBARI AND BROS. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 560] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH (1964] 1963 pute must be governed by Rule S(a)(i) of the respon-dent's Standing Orders. Workmen of Dewan Tea In the result, we reverse the finding of the …

    A.K. Sarkar

36. WORKMEN OF DEWAN TEA ESTATE AND ORS. versus THE MANAGEMENT

    Supreme Court of India 25 November 1963 1963 INSC 232 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 548 Cited by 4

    Case: WORKMEN OF DEWAN TEA ESTATE AND ORS. versus THE MANAGEMENT [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 548] (1964) Section: CONCLUSION 548 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1964] 1963 WORKMEN OF DEWAN TEA ESTATE AND ORS. November, 25 v. THE MANAGEMENT (P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, K.N. WANCHOO AND · K.C. DAS GUPTA …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

37. THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF MADRAS versus J. S. BASAPPA

    Supreme Court of India 20 November 1963 1963 INSC 231 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 517 Cited by 2

    Case: THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF MADRAS versus J. S. BASAPPA [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 517] (1964) Section: CONCLUSION THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF MADRAS V. J. S. BASAPPA (A.K. SARKAR, M. HIDAYATULLAH AND J.C. SHAH, JJ.) Juri:Jdiction of Civil Courts-Statute conferring finality of …

    A.K. Sarkar

38. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, HYDERABAD versus SRI RAJAREDDY MALLARAM

    Supreme Court of India 20 November 1963 1963 INSC 230 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 508

    Case: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, HYDERABAD versus SRI RAJAREDDY MALLARAM [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 508] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH 508 SUPREME COURT REPORTS . [1964) 1963 the partners and therefore on him. The partnership agreement did not speak of market value or fair Jivarajbhai value. …

    A.K. Sarkar

39. JIVARAJBHAI UJAMSHI SHETH AND OTHERS versus CHINTAMANRAO BALAJI AND OTHERS

    Supreme Court of India 19 November 1963 1963 INSC 229 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 480 Cited by 84

    Case: JIVARAJBHAI UJAMSHI SHETH AND OTHERS versus CHINTAMANRAO BALAJI AND OTHERS [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 480] (1964) Section: BODY I would therefore dismiss the appeal. 1963 ORDER R.P. Kapur Y. Union of India In accordance with the opinion of the majority and Anr. the appeal is allowed …

    A.K. Sarkar

40. R.P. KAPUR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

    Supreme Court of India 19 November 1963 1963 INSC 228 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 431 Cited by 348

    Case: R.P. KAPUR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 431] (1964) Section: BODY 5 S.C.R. 'Castle' being separately assessed at Bombay in the 1963 status of a registered firm apparently refer to assess---ment of that business in subsequent years and not Commissioner of …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar