All courts — latest judgments

51. MANGILAL versus SUGANCHAND RATHI

    Supreme Court of India 24 October 1963 1963 INSC 217 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 239 Cited by 43

    Case: MANGILAL versus SUGANCHAND RATHI [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 239] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH 5 S.C.R. rectness of the decree for the amount of interest 1963 pendente lite independently of the claim to set aside --that decree. The appellant here has not specifically State of …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

52. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA versus MISHRI LAL TARACHAND LODHA AND OTHERS

    Supreme Court of India 24 October 1963 1963 INSC 216 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 230 Cited by 24

    Case: STATE OF MAHARASHTRA versus MISHRI LAL TARACHAND LODHA AND OTHERS [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 230] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH 230 [1964] SUPREME COURT REPORTS 1963 relating to tax on profits of business" in paragraph 2 of the Removal of Difficulties Order. We hold The Mahalaxmi that …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

53. THE MAHALAXMI MILLS LTD. versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY

    Supreme Court of India 23 October 1963 1963 INSC 215 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 216 Cited by 1

    Case: THE MAHALAXMI MILLS LTD. versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 216] (1964) Section: BODY 216 removal. The same view has been taken in Jagadish Mitter v. Union of lndia<[1 ]) 1963 . . Champak/a/ Chimanlal Shah Shah v Chimanlal Shah Shah ~e are. …

    A.K. Sarkar

54. CHAMPAKLAL CHIMANLAL SHAH versus THE UNION OF INDIA

    Supreme Court of India 23 October 1963 1963 INSC 214 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 190 Cited by 372

    Case: CHAMPAKLAL CHIMANLAL SHAH versus THE UNION OF INDIA [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 190] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH 190 [1964] SUPREME COURT REPORTS 1963 to collect the tax as assessed and as decided in its favour.by the High Court. But when the respondent fails Thun~abhadra in the …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

55. THUNGABHADRA INDUSTRIES LTD. versus THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

    Supreme Court of India 22 October 1963 1963 INSC 213 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 174 Cited by 791

    Case: THUNGABHADRA INDUSTRIES LTD. versus THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 174] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH [1964J SUPREME COURT REPORTS 174 Rs. 70 per month. ·We direct, having regard to the circumstances, that there shall be no order as to 1963 Rs. 70 Vora …

    A.K. Sarkar

56. VORA ABBASBHAL ALIMAHOMED versus HAJI GULAMNABI HAJI SAFIBHAJ

    Supreme Court of India 22 October 1963 1963 INSC 212 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 157 Cited by 25

    Case: VORA ABBASBHAL ALIMAHOMED versus HAJI GULAMNABI HAJI SAFIBHAJ [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 157] (1964) Section: SECTION L s. 5 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS s. 45 of the Act and, if so, whether the jurisdiction of the Tribunal could only be invoked in the manner prescribed thereunder. …

    A.K. Sarkar

57. RAICHAND AMULAKH SHAH versus UNION OF INDIA

    Supreme Court of India 21 October 1963 1963 INSC 211 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 148 Cited by 2

    Case: RAICHAND AMULAKH SHAH versus UNION OF INDIA [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 148] (1964) Section: CONCLUSION 1963 October 21 RAICHAND AMULAKH SHAH v. UNION OF INDIA (P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, K. SUBBA RAO, K. N. WANCHOO, N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR AND J. R. MUDHOLKAR JJ.) Indian Railway Act …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

58. THE GENERAL ASSURANCE SOCIETY LTD. versus THE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA

    Supreme Court of India 18 October 1963 1963 INSC 210 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 125

    Case: THE GENERAL ASSURANCE SOCIETY LTD. versus THE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 125] (1964) Section: SECTION 5 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS commence from the first day of April 1954. It is 1963 clear therefore that his tenancy was by the calendar month. …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

59. MAKHAN SINGH TARSIKKA versus THE STATE OF PUNJAB

    Supreme Court of India 11 October 1963 1963 INSC 209 [1964] 4 S.C.R. 932 Cited by 2

    Case: MAKHAN SINGH TARSIKKA versus THE STATE OF PUNJAB [[1964] 4 S.C.R. 932] (1964) Section: BODY 1963 Ramesh war Shaw v. Distrz'ct Magistrate, Burdwan & Anr. Gajendra-gadkar /. 1963 October 11 The result is, i:he petition succeeds and the order of detention passed against the …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

60. RAJ KISHORE TEWARI versus GOVINDARAM BHANSALI

    Supreme Court of India 10 October 1963 1963 INSC 208 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 121

    Case: RAJ KISHORE TEWARI versus GOVINDARAM BHANSALI [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 121] (1964) Section: SECTION was made. It would be a matter for consideration 1963 at the appropriate time whether there can be any --exception to this general rule that the entire property Bhagwati Prasad sold …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar