Filter results by 1

Courts

Judges in the latest 274

Years

Decided between

1963-01-01 and 1963-12-31 · clear

Clear all filters

All courts — latest judgments

61–70 of 274 judgments, newest first (0.08 seconds)

  1. BHAGWATI PRASAD SAH AND OTHERS versus BHAGWATI PRASAD SAH AND ANOTHER

    Supreme Court of India 10 October 1963 1963 INSC 207 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 105 Cited by 1

    Case: BHAGWATI PRASAD SAH AND OTHERS versus BHAGWATI PRASAD SAH AND ANOTHER [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 105] (1964) Section: CONCLUSION BHAGWATI PRASAD SAH AND OTHERS v. BHAGWATI PRASAD SAH AND ANOTHER (P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, K. SUBBA RAO, K.N. WANCHOO, J.C. SHAH AND RAGHUBAR DAYAL JJ.) …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

  2. SYED YAKOOB versus K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & OTHERS

    Supreme Court of India 9 October 1963 1963 INSC 205 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 64 Cited by 1,554

    Case: SYED YAKOOB versus K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & OTHERS [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 64] (1964) Section: BODY 1963 October 9 SYED YAKOOB K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & OTHERS (P.B. GAJEN!JRAGADKAR, K. SUilllA RAO, K.N. WANC!IOO, J.C. SHAH AND RAGHUilAR DAYAL .I.I.) Certiorari-(Jrou1ul\· <~(issue-0'taKC …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

  3. MOHD. IKRAM HUSSAIN versus STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS

    Supreme Court of India 9 October 1963 1963 INSC 206 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 86 Cited by 159

    Case: MOHD. IKRAM HUSSAIN versus STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 86] (1964) Section: SECTION [1964] J ,,...-, 86 SUPREME COURT RF.PORTS 1963 could reconsider the matter. Indeed, learned counsel for the first respondent conceded that fact. The .~red Yakooh appellant would …

    M. Hidayatullah

  4. PRABITRA KUMAR BANNERJI versus THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

    Supreme Court of India 7 October 1963 1963 INSC 204 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 45

    Case: PRABITRA KUMAR BANNERJI versus THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 45] (1964) Section: BODY that that irregularity has resulted in any failure of justice. The order of conviction and sentence passed by the High Court cannot be reversed or altered on account of that …

    Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha

  5. JAMUNA SINGH AND OTHERS versus BHADAI SAH

    Supreme Court of India 4 October 1963 1963 INSC 203 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 37 Cited by 83

    Case: JAMUNA SINGH AND OTHERS versus BHADAI SAH [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 37] (1964) Section: CONCLUSION JAMUNA SINGH AND OTHERS v. BHADAI SAH (B.P. SINHA, C.J., M. HIDAYATULLAH AND K.C. DAS GUPTA JJ.) Criminal Trial-Cognizance of an offence on a complain!, when taken-Magistrate …

    Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha

  6. CORPORATION OF CALCUTTA versus CALCUTTA TRAMWAYS CO. LTD.

    Supreme Court of India 4 October 1963 1963 INSC 202 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 25 Cited by 4

    Case: CORPORATION OF CALCUTTA versus CALCUTTA TRAMWAYS CO. LTD. [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 25] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH 5 S.C.R. enquiry about the collection of the amount of Rs. 28,000 1963 and the destination thereof, it was imputed against Bhanwarlal that he had defrauded the …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

  7. MOHAN SINGH versus BHANW ARLAL & OTHERS.

    Supreme Court of India 3 October 1963 1963 INSC 201 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 12 Cited by 38

    Case: MOHAN SINGH versus BHANW ARLAL & OTHERS. [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 12] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH 1963 have been duly constituted under s.7 A, and the reference made on December 18, 1957 is to be deemed to have H.H. the been made as if the Tribunal were constituted under Maharana …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

  8. H.H. THE MAHARANA SAHIB SHRI BHAGWAT SINGH BAHADUR OF UDAIPUR versus THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS

    Supreme Court of India 3 October 1963 1963 INSC 200 [1964] 5 S.C.R. 1 Cited by 22

    Case: H.H. THE MAHARANA SAHIB SHRI BHAGWAT SINGH BAHADUR OF UDAIPUR versus THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHE... [[1964] 5 S.C.R. 1] (1964) Section: SECTION H.H. THE MAHARANA SAHIB SHRI BHAGWAT SINGH BAHADUR OF UDAIPUR v. THE. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS (P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, K. …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

  9. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH versus KAUSHALIYA AND OTHERS

    Supreme Court of India 1 October 1963 1963 INSC 199 [1964] 4 S.C.R. 1002 Cited by 18

    Case: THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH versus KAUSHALIYA AND OTHERS [[1964] 4 S.C.R. 1002] (1964) Section: BODY 1963 Oclober l (1964] 1002 SUPREME COURT REPORTS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH v. KAUSHALIYA AND OTHERS (P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, K. SUBBA RAO, K. N. WANCHOO, J. C. SHAH AND …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

  10. AFZAL ULLAH versus THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

    Supreme Court of India 20 September 1963 1963 INSC 197 [1964] 4 S.C.R. 991 Cited by 102

    Case: AFZAL ULLAH versus THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [[1964] 4 S.C.R. 991] (1964) Section: CONCLUSION 4S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS held that the provisiom of s. 417(4) were a 'special law' within the meaning of s. 29(2) of the Limitation Act. In that case, the High Court has …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead