Filter results by 1

Courts

Judges in the latest 299

Years

Decided between

1964-01-01 and 1964-12-31 · clear

Clear all filters

All courts — latest judgments

131–140 of 299 judgments, newest first (0.06 seconds)

  1. POTTI LAKSHMI PERUMALLU versus POTTI KRISHNA VENAMMA

    Supreme Court of India 13 August 1964 1964 INSC 167 [1965] 1 S.C.R. 26 Cited by 1

    Case: POTTI LAKSHMI PERUMALLU versus POTTI KRISHNA VENAMMA [[1965] 1 S.C.R. 26] (1965) Section: CONCLUSION POITI LAKSHMI PERUMALLU v. POTfl KRISHNA VENAMMA August 13, 1964 (K. SUBBA RAo, N. R1UAGOPALA AYYANGAR AND J. R. MuoHOLKAll JJ.) llindu Womw's Rights to Property Act, 1937 …

    K. Subba Rao

  2. MUSAMMAT MURTI DUSSADHIN AND OTHERS versus SURAJDEO SINGH AND OTHERS

    Supreme Court of India 11 August 1964 1964 INSC 166 [1965] 1 S.C.R. 20

    Case: MUSAMMAT MURTI DUSSADHIN AND OTHERS versus SURAJDEO SINGH AND OTHERS [[1965] 1 S.C.R. 20] (1965) Section: BODY MUSAMMAT MURTI DUSSADHIN AND OTHERS A v. SURAJDEO SINGH AND OTHERS August 11, 1964 (K. SUBBA RAo AND s. M. S1KR1 JJ.) B Indian Limitation Act, 1908 (9 of 1908) …

    K. Subba Rao

  3. JUGGANKHAN versus STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

    Supreme Court of India 10 August 1964 1964 INSC 165 [1965] 1 S.C.R. 14 Cited by 6

    Case: JUGGANKHAN versus STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [[1965] 1 S.C.R. 14] (1965) Section: CONCLUSION .JUGGANKHAN v. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH August 10, 1964 lK. SUBBA RAO AND S. M. Sllll JI.) CrimlMJ Law-Pouonoiu medicine-Prescription without stud1~ possible efiect-lf rash and …

    K. Subba Rao

  4. KANWAR SINGH versus DELHI ADMINISTRATION

    Supreme Court of India 5 August 1964 1964 INSC 164 [1965] 1 S.C.R. 7 Cited by 25

    Case: KANWAR SINGH versus DELHI ADMINISTRATION [[1965] 1 S.C.R. 7] (1965) Section: SECTION • A KANWAR SINGH v . DELHI ADMINISTRATION August 5, 1964 (RAGHUBAR DAYAL, J.R. MUDHOLKAR, AND S.M. SIKRI JJ.) B Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 (Act 66 of 1957), s. 418(1)-Impounding …

    Raghubar Dayal

  5. RAM KRISSEN SINGH versus DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, BANKURA DIVISION & OTHERS

    Supreme Court of India 4 August 1964 1964 INSC 163 [1965] 1 S.C.R. 1

    Case: RAM KRISSEN SINGH versus DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, BANKURA DIVISION & OTHERS [[1965] 1 S.C.R. 1] (1965) Section: BODY THE SUPREME COURT REPORTS A RAM KRI&SEN SINGH v. DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER BANKURA DIVISION & OTHERS B August 4, 1964 (P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, C. J., K. N. …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar, K.N. Wanchoo, M. Hidayatullah and others

  6. C. PERIASWAMI GOUNDAN AND ORS. versus SUNDARESA IYER AND ORS.

    Supreme Court of India 31 July 1964 1964 INSC 162 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 347 Cited by 1

    Case: C. PERIASWAMI GOUNDAN AND ORS. versus SUNDARESA IYER AND ORS. [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 347] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH in the ·statute to include in that expression what in reality is not 'income, but is deemed income, the liability to CJ.'l. assessment would justifiably be limited …

    K. Subba Rao

  7. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX BOMBAY versus CHUGANDAS AND CO., BOMBAY

    Supreme Court of India 29 July 1964 1964 INSC 161 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 332 Cited by 2

    Case: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX BOMBAY versus CHUGANDAS AND CO., BOMBAY [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 332] (1964) Section: BODY """· 29 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX BOMBAY v. CHUGANDAS AND CO., BOMBAY (K. SUBBA RAo, J.C. SHAH ANDS. M. SIKRI, JJ.) Indian Income·tax Act (XI of 1922), 1. …

    K. Subba Rao

  8. AMRIT BANASPATI CO. LTD. & ANR. versus STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS.

    Supreme Court of India 27 July 1964 1964 INSC 160 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 313

    Case: AMRIT BANASPATI CO. LTD. & ANR. versus STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS. [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 313] (1964) Section: SECTION curred after the Act, it must be interpreted reasonably that 1964 s. 13 also applies to such decrees. Mr. Pathak, learned K. Hutchi counsel for the …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

  9. K. HUTCHI GOWDER versus RICHOBDAS FATHAIMULL AND COMPANY

    Supreme Court of India 24 July 1964 1964 INSC 159 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 306

    Case: K. HUTCHI GOWDER versus RICHOBDAS FATHAIMULL AND COMPANY [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 306] (1964) Section: SECTION R. 30A( 8) is not, as a matter of law, required to be com-municated to the detenu, it is desirable and it would be fair and jusit that such a decision should in every …

    K. Subba Rao

  10. BIREN DUITA AND OTHERS versus CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF TRIPURA AND ANOTHER

    Supreme Court of India 23 July 1964 1964 INSC 158 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 295 Cited by 6

    Case: BIREN DUITA AND OTHERS versus CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF TRIPURA AND ANOTHER [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 295] (1964) Section: BODY BIREN DUITA AND OTHERS v. CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF TR.IPURA AND ANOTHER (P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, C.J., K. N. WANCHOO, M. HIDAYATULLAH, J. <;:. SHAH AND N. …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead