Filter results by 1
Courts
- Supreme Court of India294
- Calcutta High Court2
- Himachal Pradesh High Court1
- Jharkhand High Court1
- Jammu and Kashmir High Court1
Judges in the latest 299
- P.B. Gajendragadkar145
- K. Subba Rao95
- A.K. Sarkar23
- M. Hidayatullah15
- Raghubar Dayal9
- Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha8
- K.N. Wanchoo7
- J.C. Shah6
Years
Decided between
All courts — latest judgments
131–140 of 299 judgments, newest first (0.06 seconds)
-
POTTI LAKSHMI PERUMALLU versus POTTI KRISHNA VENAMMA
Supreme Court of India 13 August 1964 1964 INSC 167 [1965] 1 S.C.R. 26 Cited by 1
Case: POTTI LAKSHMI PERUMALLU versus POTTI KRISHNA VENAMMA [[1965] 1 S.C.R. 26] (1965) Section: CONCLUSION POITI LAKSHMI PERUMALLU v. POTfl KRISHNA VENAMMA August 13, 1964 (K. SUBBA RAo, N. R1UAGOPALA AYYANGAR AND J. R. MuoHOLKAll JJ.) llindu Womw's Rights to Property Act, 1937 …
K. Subba Rao
-
MUSAMMAT MURTI DUSSADHIN AND OTHERS versus SURAJDEO SINGH AND OTHERS
Supreme Court of India 11 August 1964 1964 INSC 166 [1965] 1 S.C.R. 20
Case: MUSAMMAT MURTI DUSSADHIN AND OTHERS versus SURAJDEO SINGH AND OTHERS [[1965] 1 S.C.R. 20] (1965) Section: BODY MUSAMMAT MURTI DUSSADHIN AND OTHERS A v. SURAJDEO SINGH AND OTHERS August 11, 1964 (K. SUBBA RAo AND s. M. S1KR1 JJ.) B Indian Limitation Act, 1908 (9 of 1908) …
K. Subba Rao
-
JUGGANKHAN versus STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Supreme Court of India 10 August 1964 1964 INSC 165 [1965] 1 S.C.R. 14 Cited by 6
Case: JUGGANKHAN versus STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [[1965] 1 S.C.R. 14] (1965) Section: CONCLUSION .JUGGANKHAN v. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH August 10, 1964 lK. SUBBA RAO AND S. M. Sllll JI.) CrimlMJ Law-Pouonoiu medicine-Prescription without stud1~ possible efiect-lf rash and …
K. Subba Rao
-
KANWAR SINGH versus DELHI ADMINISTRATION
Supreme Court of India 5 August 1964 1964 INSC 164 [1965] 1 S.C.R. 7 Cited by 25
Case: KANWAR SINGH versus DELHI ADMINISTRATION [[1965] 1 S.C.R. 7] (1965) Section: SECTION • A KANWAR SINGH v . DELHI ADMINISTRATION August 5, 1964 (RAGHUBAR DAYAL, J.R. MUDHOLKAR, AND S.M. SIKRI JJ.) B Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 (Act 66 of 1957), s. 418(1)-Impounding …
Raghubar Dayal
-
RAM KRISSEN SINGH versus DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, BANKURA DIVISION & OTHERS
Supreme Court of India 4 August 1964 1964 INSC 163 [1965] 1 S.C.R. 1
Case: RAM KRISSEN SINGH versus DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, BANKURA DIVISION & OTHERS [[1965] 1 S.C.R. 1] (1965) Section: BODY THE SUPREME COURT REPORTS A RAM KRI&SEN SINGH v. DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER BANKURA DIVISION & OTHERS B August 4, 1964 (P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, C. J., K. N. …
P.B. Gajendragadkar, K.N. Wanchoo, M. Hidayatullah and others
-
C. PERIASWAMI GOUNDAN AND ORS. versus SUNDARESA IYER AND ORS.
Supreme Court of India 31 July 1964 1964 INSC 162 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 347 Cited by 1
Case: C. PERIASWAMI GOUNDAN AND ORS. versus SUNDARESA IYER AND ORS. [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 347] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH in the ·statute to include in that expression what in reality is not 'income, but is deemed income, the liability to CJ.'l. assessment would justifiably be limited …
K. Subba Rao
-
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX BOMBAY versus CHUGANDAS AND CO., BOMBAY
Supreme Court of India 29 July 1964 1964 INSC 161 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 332 Cited by 2
Case: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX BOMBAY versus CHUGANDAS AND CO., BOMBAY [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 332] (1964) Section: BODY """· 29 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX BOMBAY v. CHUGANDAS AND CO., BOMBAY (K. SUBBA RAo, J.C. SHAH ANDS. M. SIKRI, JJ.) Indian Income·tax Act (XI of 1922), 1. …
K. Subba Rao
-
AMRIT BANASPATI CO. LTD. & ANR. versus STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS.
Supreme Court of India 27 July 1964 1964 INSC 160 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 313
Case: AMRIT BANASPATI CO. LTD. & ANR. versus STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS. [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 313] (1964) Section: SECTION curred after the Act, it must be interpreted reasonably that 1964 s. 13 also applies to such decrees. Mr. Pathak, learned K. Hutchi counsel for the …
P.B. Gajendragadkar
-
K. HUTCHI GOWDER versus RICHOBDAS FATHAIMULL AND COMPANY
Supreme Court of India 24 July 1964 1964 INSC 159 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 306
Case: K. HUTCHI GOWDER versus RICHOBDAS FATHAIMULL AND COMPANY [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 306] (1964) Section: SECTION R. 30A( 8) is not, as a matter of law, required to be com-municated to the detenu, it is desirable and it would be fair and jusit that such a decision should in every …
K. Subba Rao
-
BIREN DUITA AND OTHERS versus CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF TRIPURA AND ANOTHER
Supreme Court of India 23 July 1964 1964 INSC 158 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 295 Cited by 6
Case: BIREN DUITA AND OTHERS versus CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF TRIPURA AND ANOTHER [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 295] (1964) Section: BODY BIREN DUITA AND OTHERS v. CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF TR.IPURA AND ANOTHER (P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, C.J., K. N. WANCHOO, M. HIDAYATULLAH, J. <;:. SHAH AND N. …
P.B. Gajendragadkar