Filter results by 1

Courts

Judges in the latest 299

Years

Decided between

1964-01-01 and 1964-12-31 · clear

Clear all filters

All courts — latest judgments

141–150 of 299 judgments, newest first (0.08 seconds)

  1. WRIT PETITION 2

    Jharkhand High Court 1 July 1964

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHIW. P. (C) No. 5508 of 2004 The Project Manager, Bharat Coking Coal Limited, Moonidih Project, PO-Moonidih, PS. Putki, District-Dhanbad ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Jharkhand State Electricity Board, Ranchi 3. …

    Ajit Kumar

  2. CIVIL APPEAL 304 of 2001

    Himachal Pradesh High Court 10 June 1964

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. RSA No.304 of 2001. Decided on: 29[th] December, 2015. Manohar Lal deceased through his LRs. Rajiv Kumar Sharma and others .......Appellants. Versus .…Respondents. Smt. Urmila and others. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dharam Chand …

  3. SRI JAGADGURU KARI BASAVA RAJENDRASWAMI OF GAVIMUTT versus COMMISSIONER OF HINDU RELIGIOUS CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS, HYDERABAD

    Supreme Court of India 8 May 1964 1964 INSC 155 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 252 Cited by 2

    Case: SRI JAGADGURU KARI BASAVA RAJENDRASWAMI OF GAVIMUTT versus COMMISSIONER OF HINDU RELIGIOUS CHARITABL... [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 252] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH SUPREME COURT REPORTS 1964 Thus, it is clear that the equitable principle of justice, .-' Murarilal equity .and good …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

  4. MURARILAL versus DEV KARAN

    Supreme Court of India 8 May 1964 1964 INSC 154 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 239 Cited by 15

    Case: MURARILAL versus DEV KARAN [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 239] (1964) Section: BODY .Partnership Act, therefore, does not apply to him. He is not a partner of the finn and, therefore, he cannot be ad\uruca£ed insolvent for the acts of insolvency committed by respondents 2 and 3, ithe …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

  5. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, NEW DELHI versus ANANT RAO B. KAMAT

    Supreme Court of India 8 May 1964 1964 INSC 156 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 263

    Case: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, NEW DELHI versus ANANT RAO B. KAMAT [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 263] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH ) 8 S.C.R SUPREME COURT REPORTS orders that the Court held that the petitioner was entitled 1964 to seek the protection of Art. 19 and invoke the jurisdic-Sri …

    K. Subba Rao

  6. STATE OF PUNJAB versus MODERN CULTIVATORS, LADWA

    Supreme Court of India 8 May 1964 1964 INSC 157 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 273 Cited by 2

    Case: STATE OF PUNJAB versus MODERN CULTIVATORS, LADWA [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 273] (1964) Section: SECTION STATE OF PUNJAB v. MODERN CULTIVATORS, LADWA (A. K. SARKAR, M. HIDAYATULLAH AND J. R. MUDHOLKAR, JJ.) Torts-Break in canal bank-Suit for damages-defendants' …

    A.K. Sarkar

  7. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS versus EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD., MADRAS

    Supreme Court of India 7 May 1964 1964 INSC 152 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 189 Cited by 2

    Case: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS versus EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD., MADRAS [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 189] (1964) Section: CONCLUSION SUPREME COURT REPORTS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS v. EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD., MADRAS (K. SUBBA RAO, J. C. SHAH AND S. M. SIKRI. JJ.) …

    K. Subba Rao

  8. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS versus KUMBAKONAM MUTUAL BENEFIT FUND LTD.

    Supreme Court of India 7 May 1964 1964 INSC 153 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 204 Cited by 12

    Case: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS versus KUMBAKONAM MUTUAL BENEFIT FUND LTD. [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 204] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH 20.J. SUPREME COURT REPORTS sought to be put upon the expression "income~ in su!J:.s.' (2) o( s. 26 by the Revenue is . accepted, then the absence· …

    K. Subba Rao

  9. UNION OF INDIA versus ABDUL JALIL AND ORS.

    Supreme Court of India 5 May 1964 1964 INSC 151 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 158 Cited by 3

    Case: UNION OF INDIA versus ABDUL JALIL AND ORS. [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 158] (1964) Section: SECTION C. V. K. Rao v. Dtntu Bhaskara Rao Bidayatullah J. 1964 May 5 serves a notice on him stating the quantity pre-empted and the time within which the supply is to be made. The clause …

    M. Hidayatullah

  10. POONA CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION versus DATTATRAYA NAGESH DEODHER

    Supreme Court of India 5 May 1964 1964 INSC 150 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 178 Cited by 3

    Case: POONA CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION versus DATTATRAYA NAGESH DEODHER [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 178] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH 1964 Union of India v. Abdul la/ii Ayyangar 1. 1964 May 5 SUPREME COURT REPORTS such right was vested when the notification was issued; and no fresh clearings …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead