Filter results by 1
Courts
- Supreme Court of India294
- Calcutta High Court2
- Himachal Pradesh High Court1
- Jharkhand High Court1
- Jammu and Kashmir High Court1
Judges in the latest 299
- P.B. Gajendragadkar145
- K. Subba Rao95
- A.K. Sarkar23
- M. Hidayatullah15
- Raghubar Dayal9
- Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha8
- K.N. Wanchoo7
- J.C. Shah6
Years
Decided between
All courts — latest judgments
141–150 of 299 judgments, newest first (0.08 seconds)
-
WRIT PETITION 2
Jharkhand High Court 1 July 1964
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHIW. P. (C) No. 5508 of 2004 The Project Manager, Bharat Coking Coal Limited, Moonidih Project, PO-Moonidih, PS. Putki, District-Dhanbad ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Jharkhand State Electricity Board, Ranchi 3. …
Ajit Kumar
-
CIVIL APPEAL 304 of 2001
Himachal Pradesh High Court 10 June 1964
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. RSA No.304 of 2001. Decided on: 29[th] December, 2015. Manohar Lal deceased through his LRs. Rajiv Kumar Sharma and others .......Appellants. Versus .…Respondents. Smt. Urmila and others. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dharam Chand …
-
SRI JAGADGURU KARI BASAVA RAJENDRASWAMI OF GAVIMUTT versus COMMISSIONER OF HINDU RELIGIOUS CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS, HYDERABAD
Supreme Court of India 8 May 1964 1964 INSC 155 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 252 Cited by 2
Case: SRI JAGADGURU KARI BASAVA RAJENDRASWAMI OF GAVIMUTT versus COMMISSIONER OF HINDU RELIGIOUS CHARITABL... [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 252] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH SUPREME COURT REPORTS 1964 Thus, it is clear that the equitable principle of justice, .-' Murarilal equity .and good …
P.B. Gajendragadkar
-
MURARILAL versus DEV KARAN
Supreme Court of India 8 May 1964 1964 INSC 154 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 239 Cited by 15
Case: MURARILAL versus DEV KARAN [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 239] (1964) Section: BODY .Partnership Act, therefore, does not apply to him. He is not a partner of the finn and, therefore, he cannot be ad\uruca£ed insolvent for the acts of insolvency committed by respondents 2 and 3, ithe …
P.B. Gajendragadkar
-
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, NEW DELHI versus ANANT RAO B. KAMAT
Supreme Court of India 8 May 1964 1964 INSC 156 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 263
Case: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, NEW DELHI versus ANANT RAO B. KAMAT [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 263] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH ) 8 S.C.R SUPREME COURT REPORTS orders that the Court held that the petitioner was entitled 1964 to seek the protection of Art. 19 and invoke the jurisdic-Sri …
K. Subba Rao
-
STATE OF PUNJAB versus MODERN CULTIVATORS, LADWA
Supreme Court of India 8 May 1964 1964 INSC 157 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 273 Cited by 2
Case: STATE OF PUNJAB versus MODERN CULTIVATORS, LADWA [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 273] (1964) Section: SECTION STATE OF PUNJAB v. MODERN CULTIVATORS, LADWA (A. K. SARKAR, M. HIDAYATULLAH AND J. R. MUDHOLKAR, JJ.) Torts-Break in canal bank-Suit for damages-defendants' …
A.K. Sarkar
-
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS versus EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD., MADRAS
Supreme Court of India 7 May 1964 1964 INSC 152 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 189 Cited by 2
Case: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS versus EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD., MADRAS [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 189] (1964) Section: CONCLUSION SUPREME COURT REPORTS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS v. EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS LTD., MADRAS (K. SUBBA RAO, J. C. SHAH AND S. M. SIKRI. JJ.) …
K. Subba Rao
-
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS versus KUMBAKONAM MUTUAL BENEFIT FUND LTD.
Supreme Court of India 7 May 1964 1964 INSC 153 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 204 Cited by 12
Case: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS versus KUMBAKONAM MUTUAL BENEFIT FUND LTD. [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 204] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH 20.J. SUPREME COURT REPORTS sought to be put upon the expression "income~ in su!J:.s.' (2) o( s. 26 by the Revenue is . accepted, then the absence· …
K. Subba Rao
-
UNION OF INDIA versus ABDUL JALIL AND ORS.
Supreme Court of India 5 May 1964 1964 INSC 151 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 158 Cited by 3
Case: UNION OF INDIA versus ABDUL JALIL AND ORS. [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 158] (1964) Section: SECTION C. V. K. Rao v. Dtntu Bhaskara Rao Bidayatullah J. 1964 May 5 serves a notice on him stating the quantity pre-empted and the time within which the supply is to be made. The clause …
M. Hidayatullah
-
POONA CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION versus DATTATRAYA NAGESH DEODHER
Supreme Court of India 5 May 1964 1964 INSC 150 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 178 Cited by 3
Case: POONA CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION versus DATTATRAYA NAGESH DEODHER [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 178] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH 1964 Union of India v. Abdul la/ii Ayyangar 1. 1964 May 5 SUPREME COURT REPORTS such right was vested when the notification was issued; and no fresh clearings …
P.B. Gajendragadkar