Filter results by 1

Courts

Judges in the latest 299

Years

Decided between

1964-01-01 and 1964-12-31 · clear

Clear all filters

All courts — latest judgments

151–160 of 299 judgments, newest first (0.06 seconds)

  1. C. V. K. RAO versus DENTU BHASKARA RAO

    Supreme Court of India 4 May 1964 1964 INSC 148 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 152 Cited by 1

    Case: C. V. K. RAO versus DENTU BHASKARA RAO [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 152] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH 1'64 Mualtl Stat• "· of U.P. Ga1endragadkar c. J. 1964 May, 4 SUPREME COURT REPORTS 152 young men must have joined the unlawful assembly under pressure and influence of the elders of …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

  2. MASALTI versus STATE OF U. P

    Supreme Court of India 4 May 1964 1964 INSC 149 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 133 Cited by 893

    Case: MASALTI versus STATE OF U. P [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 133] (1964) Section: BODY Val/ace and Co.(') was not intended to, and did not lay ~ Jown that in every case, cancellation of an agency resulted Gillandm A.rb1 in loss of a source of revenue or that amounts paid to corn-thnot …

    P.B. Gajendragadkar

  3. KETTLEWELL BULLEN AND CO. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CALCUTTA

    Supreme Court of India 1 May 1964 1964 INSC 147 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 93 Cited by 2

    Case: KETTLEWELL BULLEN AND CO. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CALCUTTA [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 93] (1964) Section: BODY to the authority concerned to make a fresh assessment on the members of that as~ociation individually. The answer given by the High Court to the question …

    K. Subba Rao

  4. GILLANDERS ARBUTHNOT AND CO., LTD. versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CALCUTTA

    Supreme Court of India 1 May 1964 1964 INSC 146 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 121 Cited by 2

    Case: GILLANDERS ARBUTHNOT AND CO., LTD. versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CALCUTTA [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 121] (1964) Section: BODY in principle is disclosed. Where on a consideration of the 196'# circumstances, payment is made to compensate a person Kettlew-;u-Bullen for …

    K. Subba Rao

  5. STATE OF MADRAS versus C. J. COELHO

    Supreme Court of India 30 April 1964 1964 INSC 143 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 60

    Case: STATE OF MADRAS versus C. J. COELHO [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 60] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH 60 SUPREME COURT REPORTS 1964 between partners to arbitrator as provided in the condition Ja11dtsh Chander of t4eir agreement, cannot be accepted as souud. The .n.a]Orio v . . Y.T d ra er' …

    K. Subba Rao

  6. OMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, U.P., LUCKNOW versus KANPUR COAL SYNDICATE

    Supreme Court of India 30 April 1964 1964 INSC 145 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 85 Cited by 1

    Case: OMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, U.P., LUCKNOW versus KANPUR COAL SYNDICATE [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 85] (1964) Section: BODY 8 S.C.R. commencement of the amending Act. The Legislature has given to s. 18 of the Finance Act, 1956, only a limited retrospective operation i.e., upto April …

    K. Subba Rao

  7. S.S.GADGIL, INCOME-TAX OFFICER, BOMBAY versus LAL AND COMPANY

    Supreme Court of India 30 April 1964 1964 INSC 144 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 72 Cited by 330

    Case: S.S.GADGIL, INCOME-TAX OFFICER, BOMBAY versus LAL AND COMPANY [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 72] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH 1964 State of Madra1 v. C. 1. Coelho Sikri 1. 1964 April, 30. 72 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1964] amount borrowed for the purchase of the plantation when the whole …

    K. Subba Rao

  8. JAGDISH CHANDER GUPTA versus KAJARIA TRADERS (INDIA) LTD.

    Supreme Court of India 29 April 1964 1964 INSC 140 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 50 Cited by 84

    Case: JAGDISH CHANDER GUPTA versus KAJARIA TRADERS (INDIA) LTD. [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 50] (1964) Section: BODY "such" may . as weU refer to the "income" in the opening sentence of sub-s. (3). The said rnb-section says that the incomes mentioned thereunder shall not be included in the …

    K.N. Wanchoo

  9. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS versus SJVAKASI MATCH EXPORT COMPANY

    Supreme Court of India 29 April 1964 1964 INSC 141 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 18 Cited by 1

    Case: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS versus SJVAKASI MATCH EXPORT COMPANY [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 18] (1964) Section: BODY 1964 Cj.T., Madras v. Amrutan;an Ltd. Shah J. 18 But even that argument is of no value, for twenty-five per cent of the voting power attached to the ordinary …

    K. Subba Rao

  10. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX KERALA AND COIMBATORE versus KRISHNA WARRIAR

    Supreme Court of India 29 April 1964 1964 INSC 142 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 36 Cited by 2

    Case: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX KERALA AND COIMBATORE versus KRISHNA WARRIAR [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 36] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH 1964 CJ.T., Modrt11 •• Slvaklui Match Export Co. SWJ. [rg64J so complied with, the taxing authorities would be bound to refuse to give the taxpayer the …

    K. Subba Rao

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead