Filter results by 1
Courts
- Supreme Court of India294
- Calcutta High Court2
- Himachal Pradesh High Court1
- Jharkhand High Court1
- Jammu and Kashmir High Court1
Judges in the latest 299
- P.B. Gajendragadkar145
- K. Subba Rao95
- A.K. Sarkar23
- M. Hidayatullah15
- Raghubar Dayal9
- Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha8
- K.N. Wanchoo7
- J.C. Shah6
Years
Decided between
All courts — latest judgments
151–160 of 299 judgments, newest first (0.06 seconds)
-
C. V. K. RAO versus DENTU BHASKARA RAO
Supreme Court of India 4 May 1964 1964 INSC 148 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 152 Cited by 1
Case: C. V. K. RAO versus DENTU BHASKARA RAO [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 152] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH 1'64 Mualtl Stat• "· of U.P. Ga1endragadkar c. J. 1964 May, 4 SUPREME COURT REPORTS 152 young men must have joined the unlawful assembly under pressure and influence of the elders of …
P.B. Gajendragadkar
-
MASALTI versus STATE OF U. P
Supreme Court of India 4 May 1964 1964 INSC 149 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 133 Cited by 893
Case: MASALTI versus STATE OF U. P [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 133] (1964) Section: BODY Val/ace and Co.(') was not intended to, and did not lay ~ Jown that in every case, cancellation of an agency resulted Gillandm A.rb1 in loss of a source of revenue or that amounts paid to corn-thnot …
P.B. Gajendragadkar
-
KETTLEWELL BULLEN AND CO. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CALCUTTA
Supreme Court of India 1 May 1964 1964 INSC 147 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 93 Cited by 2
Case: KETTLEWELL BULLEN AND CO. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CALCUTTA [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 93] (1964) Section: BODY to the authority concerned to make a fresh assessment on the members of that as~ociation individually. The answer given by the High Court to the question …
K. Subba Rao
-
GILLANDERS ARBUTHNOT AND CO., LTD. versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CALCUTTA
Supreme Court of India 1 May 1964 1964 INSC 146 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 121 Cited by 2
Case: GILLANDERS ARBUTHNOT AND CO., LTD. versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CALCUTTA [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 121] (1964) Section: BODY in principle is disclosed. Where on a consideration of the 196'# circumstances, payment is made to compensate a person Kettlew-;u-Bullen for …
K. Subba Rao
-
STATE OF MADRAS versus C. J. COELHO
Supreme Court of India 30 April 1964 1964 INSC 143 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 60
Case: STATE OF MADRAS versus C. J. COELHO [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 60] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH 60 SUPREME COURT REPORTS 1964 between partners to arbitrator as provided in the condition Ja11dtsh Chander of t4eir agreement, cannot be accepted as souud. The .n.a]Orio v . . Y.T d ra er' …
K. Subba Rao
-
OMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, U.P., LUCKNOW versus KANPUR COAL SYNDICATE
Supreme Court of India 30 April 1964 1964 INSC 145 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 85 Cited by 1
Case: OMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, U.P., LUCKNOW versus KANPUR COAL SYNDICATE [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 85] (1964) Section: BODY 8 S.C.R. commencement of the amending Act. The Legislature has given to s. 18 of the Finance Act, 1956, only a limited retrospective operation i.e., upto April …
K. Subba Rao
-
S.S.GADGIL, INCOME-TAX OFFICER, BOMBAY versus LAL AND COMPANY
Supreme Court of India 30 April 1964 1964 INSC 144 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 72 Cited by 330
Case: S.S.GADGIL, INCOME-TAX OFFICER, BOMBAY versus LAL AND COMPANY [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 72] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH 1964 State of Madra1 v. C. 1. Coelho Sikri 1. 1964 April, 30. 72 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1964] amount borrowed for the purchase of the plantation when the whole …
K. Subba Rao
-
JAGDISH CHANDER GUPTA versus KAJARIA TRADERS (INDIA) LTD.
Supreme Court of India 29 April 1964 1964 INSC 140 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 50 Cited by 84
Case: JAGDISH CHANDER GUPTA versus KAJARIA TRADERS (INDIA) LTD. [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 50] (1964) Section: BODY "such" may . as weU refer to the "income" in the opening sentence of sub-s. (3). The said rnb-section says that the incomes mentioned thereunder shall not be included in the …
K.N. Wanchoo
-
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS versus SJVAKASI MATCH EXPORT COMPANY
Supreme Court of India 29 April 1964 1964 INSC 141 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 18 Cited by 1
Case: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS versus SJVAKASI MATCH EXPORT COMPANY [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 18] (1964) Section: BODY 1964 Cj.T., Madras v. Amrutan;an Ltd. Shah J. 18 But even that argument is of no value, for twenty-five per cent of the voting power attached to the ordinary …
K. Subba Rao
-
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX KERALA AND COIMBATORE versus KRISHNA WARRIAR
Supreme Court of India 29 April 1964 1964 INSC 142 [1964] 8 S.C.R. 36 Cited by 2
Case: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX KERALA AND COIMBATORE versus KRISHNA WARRIAR [[1964] 8 S.C.R. 36] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH 1964 CJ.T., Modrt11 •• Slvaklui Match Export Co. SWJ. [rg64J so complied with, the taxing authorities would be bound to refuse to give the taxpayer the …
K. Subba Rao