Filter precedents
1
Reset allBench: K. Subba Rao
Case: MATIULLAH SHEIKH versus THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 978] (1964) Section: SECTION SUPREME COURT REPORTS (1964] JGM trades, callings or employments shall be invalid RaJagopalacllari on the ground that it relates to a tax on income." CorpoT~inn of Thi~ section …
Bench: P.B. Gajendragadkar
Case: C. RAJAGOPALACHARI versus CORPORATION OF MADRAS [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 962] (1964) Section: BODY Morch, J. SUPREME COURT REPORTS C. RAJAGOPALACHARI v. CORPORATION OF MADRAS (P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, C.J., K. N. WANCHOO, J. C. SHAH, N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR AND s. M. S!KRJ JJ.) City …
Bench: P.B. Gajendragadkar
Case: BASANT KUMAR SARKAR AND OTHERS versus EAGLE ROLLING MILLS LTD. AND OTHERS [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 913] (1964) Section: CONCLUSION BA~A NT KUMAR SARKAR AND OTHERS v. EAGLE ROLLING MILLS LTD. AND OTHERS (P. B.) GAJENDRAGADKAR, C.J., K. N. WANCHOO, J. c. SHAH, N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR …
Bench: K. Subba Rao
Case: SHIV PRASAD CHUNILAL JAIN versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 920] (1964) Section: SECTION 19M Ba1ant Kumar v. llark RoWng Mills Gaiendragadkar c. J. 1964 February 26 SUPREME COURT REPORTS 920 No. 1 in all the three appeals were not entitled to curtail the …
Bench: P.B. Gajendragadkar
Case: STATE OF RAJASTHAN versus MUKANCHAND AND OTHERS [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 903] (1964) Section: SECTION 6 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS cannot be combined as suggested by Mr. Palkhivala, but must be asserted each in its own way and within its own limits; the sweep of the several …
Bench: P.B. Gajendragadkar
Case: TATA ENGINEERING AND LOCOMOTIVE CO. LTD. versus STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 885] (1964) Section: SECTION TATA ENGINEERING AND LOCOMOTIVE CO. LTD. .,, STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS (P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, C.J .. K. N. WANCHOO, J. c. SHAH, N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR …
Bench: P.B. Gajendragadkar
Case: RAFIQUENNESSA versus LAL BAHADUR CHETRI (DEAD) THROUGH ITS REPRESENTATIVES AND OTHERS [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 876] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH SUPREME COURT REPORTS [rg64) 1964 taxing entries in the legislative Lists I and II of the Seventh R. Ab~uad., Schedule &re entirely …
Bench: P.B. Gajendragadkar
Case: R. ABDUL QUADER AND CO. versus SALES TAX OFFICER, HYDERABAD [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 867] (1964) Section: BODY 6 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS llllnd on a different footing from new assessments after the l9tll new law comes into force. It is true that Parliament provid-B•"'""'•' ed …
Bench: P.B. Gajendragadkar
Case: HUKUMCHAND MILLS LID. versus THE STATE OF MADHYA BHARAT AND ANOTHER [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 857] (1964) Section: BODY 6 S.C.R. 857 1[[964 ]]of Madlqfi, Pradult v. s,,,., lndunriu Shah 1. possession, showing a rational relation between the differ-1[[964 ]]1ential treatment and the …
Bench: P.B. Gajendragadkar
Case: K.S.RASHID & SONS AND ANOTHER versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, U.P. AND OTHERS [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 826] (1964) Section: BODY • 1961 ·Rlllnclumdra Rambu v. Clunnpabal Mudholkar J. 1961 ,Fcbr1111TY 19. allowed Sitabai to remain in possession of Ramdhan's movables. At least …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault