All courts — latest judgments

281. Supreme Court of India 29 January 1964 1964 INSC 18 [1964] 6 S.C.R. 411 • Cited by 29

     INCOME-TAX OFFICER, A-WARD, SITAPUR versus MURLIDHAR BHAGWANDAS, LAKHIMPUR KHERI

     Bench: Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha

     Case: INCOME-TAX OFFICER, A-WARD, SITAPUR versus MURLIDHAR BHAGWANDAS, LAKHIMPUR KHERI [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 411] (1964) Section: BODY SUPREME COURT REPORTS either with cl. (1) of Art. 15 or cL (2) of Art. 29 to require 1964 the consideration of the castes of persons tto be borne in …

     View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

     27 Pages
282. Supreme Court of India 29 January 1964 1964 INSC 20 [1964] 6 S.C.R. 446 Followed in 1

     GODAVARI SHAMRAO PARULEKAR versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

     Bench: P.B. Gajendragadkar

     Case: GODAVARI SHAMRAO PARULEKAR versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 446] (1964) Section: SECTION 1964 K. C. Thomas. 1. T. Officer, Bombay v. V. H. Shah Mudho/kor J. 1964 Ja1iuary, 29 SUPREME COURT REPORT-S We may add that the amendment of 1953 took effect …

     View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

     16 Pages
283. Supreme Court of India 29 January 1964 1964 INSC 19 [1964] 6 S.C.R. 437 • Cited by 1

     K.C.THOMAS, FIRST INCOME-TAX OFFICER, BOMBAY versus VASANT HIRALAL SHAH & ORS.

     Bench: Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha

     Case: K.C.THOMAS, FIRST INCOME-TAX OFFICER, BOMBAY versus VASANT HIRALAL SHAH & ORS. [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 437] (1964) Section: SECTION are, therefore, unable to accept the contention of learned counsel. For the foregoing reasons we allow the appeal and quash the writ of certiorari …

     View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

     10 Pages
284. Supreme Court of India 27 January 1964 1964 INSC 15 [1964] 6 S.C.R. 330 Followed in 1

     C. S. ROWJEE AND OTHERS versus ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION

     Bench: Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha

     Case: C. S. ROWJEE AND OTHERS versus ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 330] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH 1964 Balmukand v. Kamlawati MudholklJI' J. must be left unperformed forms a considerable portion of the whole, or does not admit of compensation …

     View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

     38 Pages
285. Supreme Court of India 27 January 1964 1964 INSC 16 [1964] 6 S.C.R. 321 • Cited by 3

     BALMUKAND versus KAMLA WATI & ORS.

     Bench: K. Subba Rao

     Case: BALMUKAND versus KAMLA WATI & ORS. [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 321] (1964) Section: BODY 321 in State of Ra;asthan v. Shiv Singh(') and by the Allaha- 1!164 Faddi v. - . bad High Court in A/lahdia v. State([2]). We therefore hold that the objection to the admissibility [51]• [1]• …

     View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

     10 Pages
286. Supreme Court of India 24 January 1964 1964 INSC 14 [1964] 6 S.C.R. 312 Followed in 4

     FADDI versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

     Bench: M. Hidayatullah

     Case: FADDI versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 312] (1964) Section: PARAGRAPH 312 1964 1964 of the provisions of the Act; and Art. 31 (2) deals with Jt4nt RaJn.aprova compulsory acquisition or requisition which also is entirely 1!~v• inapplicable to the present …

     View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

     10 Pages
287. Supreme Court of India 23 January 1964 1964 INSC 13 [1964] 6 S.C.R. 294 Followed in 5

     K. KANKARATHNAMMA AND OTIIERS versus STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHERS

     Bench: K. Subba Rao

     Case: K. KANKARATHNAMMA AND OTIIERS versus STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHERS [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 294] (1964) Section: BODY 1'64 ,.,._,, Zl SUPREME COURT REPORTS K. KANKARATHNAMMA AND OTIIERS "· STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTIIBRS (K. SuBBA RA<> AND J. R. MuoHOLKAR) Land …

     View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

     8 Pages
288. Supreme Court of India 23 January 1964 1964 INSC 12 [1964] 6 S.C.R. 301 Followed in 1

     RANI RATNA PROVA DEVI RANI SAHEBA OF DHENKENAL versus STATE OF ORISSA AND ANOTHER

     Bench: P.B. Gajendragadkar

     Case: RANI RATNA PROVA DEVI RANI SAHEBA OF DHENKENAL versus STATE OF ORISSA AND ANOTHER [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 301] (1964) Section: BODY derable force. At any rate we do not think that there are lll1Y substantial grounds upon which we can look at these transact10ns in a different way. …

     View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

     12 Pages
289. Supreme Court of India 21 January 1964 1964 INSC 10 [1965] 3 S.C.R. 854 • Cited by 16

     VAJ,LABHDAS LILADBAR AND ORS. versus ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

     Bench: P.B. Gajendragadkar

     Case: VAJ,LABHDAS LILADBAR AND ORS. versus ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS [[1965] 3 S.C.R. 854] (1965) Section: BODY VAJ,LABHDAS LILADBAR AND ORS. v. ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS B January 21, 1964 [P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, A. K. SARKAR, K. N. WANCHOO, K. c. OAS GUPTA AND N. …

     View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

     7 Pages
290. Supreme Court of India 21 January 1964 1964 INSC 11 [1964] 6 S.C.R. 275

     SOM CHAND SANGHVI versus BIBHUTI BHUSAN CHAKRAVARTY

     Bench: K. Subba Rao

     Case: SOM CHAND SANGHVI versus BIBHUTI BHUSAN CHAKRAVARTY [[1964] 6 S.C.R. 275] (1964) Section: CONCLUSION SOM CHAND SANGHVI v. BIBHUTI BHUSAN CHAKRA VARTY (K. SuBBA RAo AND J. R. MuDHOLKAR JJ.) ·Code of C1·imi11al J'rocedure, 1898 (Act 5 of 1898), s. 191·->l"COP• o/ The …

     View Full Judgment Copy citation Save to My Vault

     5 Pages