Filter results by 1

Courts

Judges in the latest 300

Years

Decided between

1989-01-01 and 1989-12-31 · clear

Clear all filters

All courts — latest judgments

31–40 of 473 judgments, newest first (0.11 seconds)

  1. KALYAN SINGH, LONDON TRAINED, CUTTER, JOHRI BAZAR, JAIPUR versus SMT. CHHOTI AND ORS.

    Supreme Court of India 1 December 1989 1989 INSC 370 [1989] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 356

    Case: KALYAN SINGH, LONDON TRAINED, CUTTER, JOHRI BAZAR, JAIPUR versus SMT. CHHOTI AND ORS. [[1989] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 356] (1989) Section: BODY A KAL YAN SINGH, LONDON TRAINED, CUTTER, JOHRI BAZAR, JAIPUR v. SMT. CHHOTI AND ORS. B DECEMBER I, 1989 [SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, K. …

    Sabyasachi Mukherji

  2. DUNLOP INDIA LTD. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

    Supreme Court of India 1 December 1989 1989 INSC 371 [1989] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 370

    Case: DUNLOP INDIA LTD. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. [[1989] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 370] (1989) Section: BODY DUNLOP INDIA LTD. A v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. DECEMBER I, 1989 B [S. RANGANATHAN AND M.M. PUNCHHI, JJ.] Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944: Sections 4 and 3~Tariff Item No. …

    S. Ranganathan

  3. WRIT PETITION 9062 of 1990

    Punjab and Haryana High Court 30 November 1989

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No. 9062 of 1990Date of decision : December 02, 2010 Indraj, ...... Petitioner v. The State of Haryana and others, ...... Respondents. *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present :None for the petitioner. Mr. …

  4. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS versus FILIP TIAGO DE GAMA OF VEDEM VASCO DE GAMA

    Supreme Court of India 30 November 1989 1989 INSC 368 [1989] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 336

    Case: UNION OF INDIA AND ORS versus FILIP TIAGO DE GAMA OF VEDEM VASCO DE GAMA [[1989] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 336] (1989) Section: SECTION U1~ION OF INDIA AND ORS v. FILIP TIAGO DE GAMA OF VEDEM VASCO DE GAMA NOVEMBER 30, 1989 B [K. JAGANNATH SHETTY AND A.M. AHMADI, JJ.] Land …

    K. Jagannatha Shetty

  5. DANDASI SAHU versus STATE OF ORISSA

    Supreme Court of India 30 November 1989 1989 INSC 369 [1989] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 348

    Case: DANDASI SAHU versus STATE OF ORISSA [[1989] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 348] (1989) Section: BODY A DANDASI SAHU v. STATE OF ORISSA NOVEMBER 30, 1989 B [SABYASACHI MUKHARJJ AND V. RAMASWAMI, JJ.] Arbitration Act, 1940: Sections 30 and 16-Award not disclosing the documentary evidence …

    Sabyasachi Mukherji

  6. JAGRIT MAZDOOR UNION (REGD.) & ORS. ETC. ETC. versus MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD. & ANR. ETC. ETC.

    Supreme Court of India 29 November 1989 1989 INSC 367 [1989] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 329

    Case: JAGRIT MAZDOOR UNION (REGD.) & ORS. ETC. ETC. versus MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD. & ANR. ETC. ETC. [[1989] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 329] (1989) Section: CONCLUSION JAGRIT MAZDOOR UNION (REGO.) & ORS. ETC. ETC. v. MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD. & ANR. ETC. ETC. NOVEMBER 29, 1989 …

    Ranganath Misra

  7. PARAS NATH AND ANR. MAMMAN SINGH AND ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

    Supreme Court of India 28 November 1989 1989 INSC 365 [1989] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 323

    Case: PARAS NATH AND ANR. MAMMAN SINGH AND ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. [[1989] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 323] (1989) Section: BODY PARAS NATH AND ANR. MAMMAN SINGH AND ORS. v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. A NOVEMBER 28, 1989 [RANGANATH MISRA, P.B. SAWANT AND K. RAMASWAMY, JJ.) B Delhi …

    Ranganath Misra

  8. SHIV CHANDER KAPOOR versus AMAR BOSE

    Supreme Court of India 28 November 1989 1989 INSC 364 [1989] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 299

    Case: SHIV CHANDER KAPOOR versus AMAR BOSE [[1989] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 299] (1989) Section: BODY SHIV CHANDER KAPOOR v. AMAR BOSE NOVEMBER 28, 1989 [M.N. VENKATACHALIAH, N.D. OJHA AND J.S. VERMA, JJ.] Delhi Rent Control Act 1958--Section 21-Contro/Ier-Permis-sion to create. …

    M.N. Venkatachaliah

  9. MADANLAL MANOHARLAL AND ORS. ETC. ETC. versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

    Supreme Court of India 28 November 1989 1989 INSC 363 [1989] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 293

    Case: MADANLAL MANOHARLAL AND ORS. ETC. ETC. versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. [[1989] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 293] (1989) Section: BODY MADANLAL MANOHARLAL AND ORS. ETC. ETC. v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. NOVEMBER 28, 1989 [S. RANGANATHAN, N.D. OJHA AND J.S. VERMA, JJ.) Punjab …

    S. Ranganathan

  10. SMT. SREELATHA BHUPAL ETC. ETC. versus GOVT. OF ANDHRA PRADESH REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, HYDERABAD AND OTHERS ETC. ETC.

    Supreme Court of India 28 November 1989 1989 INSC 366 [1989] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 314

    Case: SMT. SREELATHA BHUPAL ETC. ETC. versus GOVT. OF ANDHRA PRADESH REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE... [[1989] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 314] (1989) Section: BODY A SMT. SREELATHA BHUPAL ETC. ETC. v. GOVT. OF ANDHRA PRADESH REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, HYDERABAD …

    G.L. Oza

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead