Showing 351–360 of 433 judgments, newest first 0.16 seconds

  • Decided 1992✕
Filter precedents 1 Reset all

CourtsTotal 8

Decision period

Presiding judgeslatest 300

All courts — latest judgments

  1. Supreme Court of India 10 March 1992 1992 INSC 70 [1992] 2 S.C.R. 81

    KIRLOSKAR BROTHERS LTD., DEWAS (M.P.) versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

    Bench: S. Ranganathan

    Case: KIRLOSKAR BROTHERS LTD., DEWAS (M.P.) versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. [[1992] 2 S.C.R. 81] (1992) Section: BODY ---< _...... ,1 ,,1.... ':>< A KIRLOSKAR BROTHERS LTD., DEWAS (M.P.) v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MARCH 10, 1992 B [S. RAN GANA THAN, V. RAMASW AMI AND YOGESHW AR …

    20 Pages
  2. Supreme Court of India 10 March 1992 1992 INSC 68 [1992] 2 S.C.R. 101

    DADU RAU YELAVADE (DEAD) BY HIS HEIRS AND LRS versus HIMMAT RASUL PATEL

    Bench: S. Ranganathan

    Case: DADU RAU YELAVADE (DEAD) BY HIS HEIRS AND LRS versus HIMMAT RASUL PATEL [[1992] 2 S.C.R. 101] (1992) Section: BODY DADU RAU YELAVADE(DEAD) BY HIS HEIRS AND LRS. v. HIMMAT RASUL PATEL MARCH 10, 1992 B [S.RANGANATHAN, V. RAMASWAMI AND YOGESHWAR DAYAL. JJ.] Bombay Tenancy and …

    8 Pages
  3. Supreme Court of India 10 March 1992 1992 INSC 69 [1992] 2 S.C.R. 109 Followed in 4

    KUMAR PADMA PRASAD versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

    Bench: Kuldip Singh

    Case: KUMAR PADMA PRASAD versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. [[1992] 2 S.C.R. 109] (1992) Section: BODY -( A KUMAR PADMA PRASAD v. ' UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MARCH 10, 1992 [KULDIP SINGH, P.B. SAWANT AND N.M. KASLIWAL, JJ.] B Constitution of India, 1950 : Articles 50, 136, 139A, 217 …

    35 Pages
  4. Himachal Pradesh High Court 6 March 1992

    CRIMINAL APPEAL 33/2 of 1993

    33/2 of 1993

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Criminal Appeal No.448 of 2000. Judgement reserved on: 20.12.2007. Date of decision: December 24, 2007. Coram Kuldip Singh, Judge. The State has filed this appeal against the judgment dated 3.1.2000, passed by learned Additional …

    5 Pages
  5. Supreme Court of India 6 March 1992 1992 INSC 67 [1992] 2 S.C.R. 47

    JAMMI RAJA RAO versus ANJANEYASWAMI TEMPLE VALU ETC.

    Bench: M. Fathima Beevi

    Case: JAMMI RAJA RAO versus ANJANEYASWAMI TEMPLE VALU ETC. [[1992] 2 S.C.R. 47] (1992) Section: SECTION JAMMI RAJA RAO v. ANJANEYASWAMI TEMPLE VALU ETC. MARCH 6, 1992 Appeal by special /eave-Concurrent finding of fact-Power of Supreme Court to interfere with. The appellant's …

    20 Pages
  6. Supreme Court of India 6 March 1992 1992 INSC 65 [1992] 2 S.C.R. 68 • Cited by 20

    CHAIRMAN, CANARA BANK, BANGALORE versus M. S. JASRA AND ORS.

    Bench: L.M. Sharma

    Case: CHAIRMAN, CANARA BANK, BANGALORE versus M. S. JASRA AND ORS. [[1992] 2 S.C.R. 68] (1992) Section: BODY A CHAIRMAN, CANARA BANK, BANGALORE v. M. S. JASRA AND ORS. ;...__ MARCH 6, 1992 B [L. M. SHARMA, J. S.VERMA ~ YOGESHWAR DAYAL, JJ.] Banking Regulation Act, 1949: Section …

    13 Pages
  7. Supreme Court of India 6 March 1992 1992 INSC 66 [1992] 2 S.C.R. 39

    ASHWANI KUMAR DHINGRA versus STATE OF PUNJAB

    Bench: N.M. Kasliwal

    Case: ASHWANI KUMAR DHINGRA versus STATE OF PUNJAB [[1992] 2 S.C.R. 39] (1992) Section: BODY -~ - ASHW ANI KUMAR DHINGRA v. A STATE OF PUNJAB MARCH 6, 1992 [N. M. KASLIWAL AND YOGESHWAR DAYAL, JJ.J B Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Ss. 4, 6, 12, 18--Land acquisition-Co-owne~Writ …

    8 Pages
  8. Supreme Court of India 5 March 1992 1992 INSC 64 [1992] 2 S.C.R. 30 Followed in 7

    SMT. GURO versus ATMA SINGH AND ORS.

    Bench: M. Fathima Beevi

    Case: SMT. GURO versus ATMA SINGH AND ORS. [[1992] 2 S.C.R. 30] (1992) Section: SECTION A SMT. GURO v. ATMA SINGH AND ORS. MARCH 5, 1992 B [M. FATHIMA BEEVI AND S.C. AGRAWAL, JJ.] Indian Succession Act, 1924-Section 63-Will-Mode of proving-Re-quirements prescribed to be …

    9 Pages
  9. Supreme Court of India 5 March 1992 1992 INSC 63 [1992] 2 S.C.R. 13 Followed in 36

    AMRIT BANASPATI CO. LTD. AND ANR. versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.

    Bench: R.M. Sahai

    Case: AMRIT BANASPATI CO. LTD. AND ANR. versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. [[1992] 2 S.C.R. 13] (1992) Section: BODY AMRIT BANASPATI CO. LTD. AND ANR. v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. MARCH 5, 1992 [R. M. SAHAI AND S. MOHAN, JJ.] Promissory Estoppe~ature extent and applicability …

    17 Pages
  10. Supreme Court of India 4 March 1992 1992 INSC 62 [1992] 2 S.C.R. 1 Followed in 53

    RAMESH HIRANAND KUNDANMAL versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER BOMBAY AND ORS.

    Bench: M. Fathima Beevi

    Case: RAMESH HIRANAND KUNDANMAL versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER BOMBAY AND ORS. [[1992] 2 S.C.R. 1] (1992) Section: BODY '>- y )- ~ .;~ :- . A RAMESH HIRANAND KUNDANMAL v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER BOMBAY AND ORS. MARCH 4, 1992 B fM. FATHIMA BEEVI AND S.C. …

    12 Pages

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead