Filter precedents
1
Reset all90 of 1983
COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL. Criminal Revision No. 588/2001 (Old No. 202/1984) Azimuddin son of Nizamuddin, R/o Sarkara, P.S. Bajpur, District Nainital …..Appellant. Vs. State …..Respondent. Sri Sayed Nadim Advocate learned counsel for the revisionist. Learned A.G.A. for the
1136 of 2003
of 2003 Hon. P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard Mr. Dhram Veer, Sharma learned Standing Counsel for the petitioner. Perused the First Information Report dated 03.12.2003. It discloses cognizable offence and the allegations made therein are inherently probable. …
316 of 2001
No. 316 of 2001 (Old No. 1493 of 2000) Hon’ble M.M.Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri R.P. Nautiyal learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that he has filed vakalatnama on behalf of applicant on 05.12.2003. He has submitted that the grievance of the applicant has already been …
53 of 2001
COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL. Criminal Revision No. 53/2001 (Old No. 324/1987) Jumma, son of Chotey, R/o village Bahadurganj, P.S. Dilari, District Moradabad …..Revisionist. Vs. State …..Respondent. Sri Dharam Veer Sharma, Advocate learned counsel for the revisionist. Sri
12 of 2001
Petition No. 12 of 2001 Hon. P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J. In view of the apology tendered in the affidavit filed by the alleged contemnor we discharge the notices and dismiss the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed. Dt. 22.12.2003. (P.C. Verma, J.) G/H …
419 of 2003
of 2003 Hon. P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard Ms. Jyotsna and Shri A.K. Yashodas, learned counsel for the appellant. This is an appeal filed against the order dated 28.11.203 passed by the Judge, Family Court refusing the permission to sale the property of the …
941 of 2003
of 2003 Hon. P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition with the permission that Uttaranchal Electricity Regulatory Commission may consider the objections raised in the writ petition in the next Financial Year …
380 of 2001
of 2001 (Old No. 936 of 2000) Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J. None appear for the appellants. Sri Lok Pal Singh Advocate for respondent is present. although Appellant No. 1 had died on 16.2.2003, no substitution application has been preferred on behalf as his heirs. Even otherwise …
2002 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. The petitioner does not press the petition he only submits that he will only made a representation and the same may be decided within a month. The prayer is innocuous. Therefore, it is accepted in case representation is …
2002 Hon. P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard Mr. N.S. Negi learned counsel for the petitioner. In the meantime, the State Government is directed to dispose of the representation dated 11.02.2002 within a period of three months. Petitioner does not pray for any other …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault