WP/22205/2003 of B.HARSHA,MINOR Vs THE REGISTRAR
22205 of 2003
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10/12/2003 CORAM THE HONOURABLE
22205 of 2003
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10/12/2003 CORAM THE HONOURABLE
1717 of 2003
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10/12/2003 CORAM THE HONOURABLE
13797 of 1990
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10/12/2003 CORAM THE
Bench: A.M.Khanwilkar,P. V. Hardas10 of 2002
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA **** CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 43 OF 2003 Mr. V. V. Mohan, presently undergoing sentence at Central Jail, Aguada, Bardez, Goa. ...Appellant. Versus S T A T E ...Respondent. Shri A . B. D’Sa, advocate for the appellant. Shri S. N. Sardessai, Public …
Bench: A.M.Khanwilkar,P. V. Hardas14/2000
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL APPEALS NO. 13, 35 AND 36 OF 2003. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 13 OF 2003. Ravi alias Ravi Kumar Patil, son of Vishwanath Patil, aged 18 years, labour, resident of C/o Suresh Gopi Chanappa,, Vodacodem, Porvorim. Native of Gayakwad Nagar, Malwani …
Bench: A.M.Khanwilkar,P. V. Hardas14/2000
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL APPEALS NO. 13, 35 AND 36 OF 2003. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 13 OF 2003. Ravi alias Ravi Kumar Patil, son of Vishwanath Patil, aged 18 years, labour, resident of C/o Suresh Gopi Chanappa,, Vodacodem, Porvorim. Native of Gayakwad Nagar, Malwani …
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. Writ PetitionNe. —L (3 é 2" 9f2902. M PETITIONERS ' 1. Versus. RESPGNDENTS : J'IJNION OF INDIA, Through : Secretary, Ministry of Steel, Shram Shakti Bhawan, New Delhi. / k" .,, A VrDJLzr SHRI A.V. RAMANA RAO ZvAge 57 Years, S/o
COURT OF JUDQggTURE 0§_czmATrISGAR1-i AT/BILASPUR, wRIT pETITiON NOLMQgOF 2003 P ETITI ON E n B.P.,n$harma aged 76 years son of L ée Shri Pyarelal, Rté. chief ngineer Irrigation R/o Vidya Upnagar, Bilaspur District- Bil aSp ur (c. g. 1 Ram Krisma Bhargav age 6t) years S/o
7758 of 2003
COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N ngal Nagpur Cotton M111 A umt of Nat1ona1 Text11e Corporatlon through K R h1ttawar, Off1c1at1ng Facory, Manager Rajnandgaon Chhatt1sgar)h PETITIONER VERSUS State of Chhatt1sgarh throug §ecreta1y, Department of commerce and …
1286 of 2003
UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL (Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting) (Chapter VIII Rule 32 (2)(b) Description of the case. W.P. No. 1286 of 2003 (SS) Jagdish vs. Union of India Approved for reporting. _______________________ Not approved for reporting Date …