Filter precedents
1
Reset all95 of 2005
31.12.2007 Present: Mr. Dalip Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 and 3. Mr. Bhupender Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Charu Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No. 4. After arguing for a while, Mr. …
166 of 2001
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.Appeal No. 166 of 2001 Reserved on: 29.12.2007 Decided on: 31.12.2007 ____________________________________________________________ State of H P Appellant. Versus Hari Dass Respondent. Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surinder Singh, J. Whether …
31.12.2007 RFA 136/2000 Learned counsel for respondent No.1 has stated at the bar that the account stand settled and closed since 2003 and nothing survives in the present appeal. In view of this statement, learned counsel for the appellants seeks liberty to withdraw the present …
935 of 2007
No. 935 of 2007. 31.12.2007 Present: Mr. K.B. Khaujria, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent. Mr. Khajuria seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the learned Sessions Judge by filing …
303 of 2007
CMPMO No. 303 of 2007. 31.12.2007 Present: Mr. Suneet Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner. After arguing for a while, Mr. Goel seeks to withdraw this petition. He also submits that this Court should extend the period granted by the learned trial Court for filing the amended …
44 of 2007 and 45 of 2007 . 31.12.2007 Present: Mr. Suneet Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents. Learned Counsel for the parties agree that these petitions be allowed and Superintending Engineer (Arbitration), HP PWD …
4 of 2003
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CR No. 4 of 2003 Reserved on: 29.12.2007 Decided on : 31.12.2007 Khem Raj and others Petitioner Versus Rattan Chand and others Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr Justice Surinder Singh,J. Whether approved for reporting ?1yes For the …
153 of 2001
reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Cr. Appeal No.153 of 2001. Judgment reserved on 28.12.2007. Dated of Decision: December 31st, 2007.
126 of 2007
Cr.MMO No. 126 of 2007. 31.12.2007 Present: Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for the petitioner. The learned Court below while exercising its discretion under Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for suspension of sentence and conviction vide the impugned order dated 1[st] …
Hon’ble Dharam Veer J. Sri Vinod Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that he does not want to press the bail application and submitted that the bail application may be dismissed as not pressed. In view of the above statement, the bail application is dismissed as …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault