Filter precedents
1
Reset all25
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.M.P.(M) No.924 of 2007 Decided on:December 28, 2007. State of Himachal Pradesh …Petitioner. VERSUS Anil & another ….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1No For the Petitioner :
111 of 2007
No.112 and 115 of 2007. 28.12.2007. Present: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Advocate, for the petitioner in both the cases. Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2 in both the cases. In view of the order passed today in Cr.MMO No.111 of 2007, Mr. Kuthiala does not …
25
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.Appeal No.481 of 2000 Reserved on:27.12.2007. Decided on:December 28, 2007. State of H.P. …Appellant. VERSUS Dogra Ram ….Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 Yes For the Appellant:
223 of 1996
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA RSA No.223 of 1996 Reserved on:20.11.2007. Decided on:December 28, 2007. State of H.P. …..Appellant. VERSUS Vinod Kumari Chandel …..Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 Yes For the
176 of 1999
28.12.2007 Present: Mr Ramakant Sharma & Ms Devyani Sharma, Advocates for the appellants. Mr N.K.Sood, Advocate for respondent No.1. The Registry has received letter dated 13.12.2007 of Padam Bhushan Bhardwaj, proprietor of M/s.Hindustan Foam Industries, stating therein that he …
2007 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal,J. Heard Sri Gopal Narain, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rakesh Thapilya, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 and Sri J.P. Joshi, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 to 4. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged …
257
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 325 of 2007 (S/B) Smt. Kalawati w/o Dhumilal @ Dhumesh Kumar Sanwal, R/o Old Kachhari Road, Uttarkashi, District Uttarkashi ……. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand through its Secretary, Rural Development, Uttarakhand,
1/85
THE CASE IS OR IS NOT APPROVED FOR REPORTING {Chapter VIII, Rule 32(2)(b)} Description of the Case. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 38 of 2002 (Old No. 1611 of 1987) Virendra Kumar Bhatnagar S/o Sri Daya Swaroop Bhatnagar, R/o Kasba Dhampur, District Bijnor ................Appellant Versus …
UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1812 (S/S) of 2007 Harish Chandra Bahuguna, S/o Sri Bhuwan Chandra Bahuguna, R/o village Bughani, Post Nayal, Patti- Malla Salam, District Almora. -------Petitioner Versus Mukhya Krishi Adhikari, Vikas Bhawan, Bhimtal, District Nainital.
257
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION No. 329 of 2007 (S/B) Dharam Singh Rawat s/o Shri Ramdutt Rawat R/o Kashirampur Malla Near Shiv Shakti Dairy, Nazibabad Road, Kotdwar, District Pauri Garhwal (Uttarakhand) …………….. Petitioner Versus 1. The
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault