Showing 371–380 of 258,046 judgments, newest first 0.27 seconds

  • Decided 2008✕
Filter precedents 1 Reset all

CourtsTotal 8

Decision period

Presiding judgeslatest 300

Document types

All courts — latest judgments

  1. Kerala High Court 30 December 2008

    Bail Appl./7618/2008 of SANTHOSH Vs STATE OF KERALA

    7618 of 2008

    HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN TUESDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER, 2008 / 9TH POUSHA, 1930 Bail Appl..No. 7618 of 2008 (CRIME NO.190/2008 OF KUDIYANMALA POLICE STATION & CMP.8348/2008 of J.M.F.C.,TALIPARAMBA) .................... …

    4 Pages
  2. Patna High Court 30 December 2008

    CIVIL APPEAL 17787 of 2024

    Bench: Satyavrat Vermaoral17787 of 2024

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACivil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17787 of 2024 ====================================================== 1.Ajitesh Kumar S/o Ramdutt Prasad R/o village Shitla Asthan, Mirchaibari,P.S. and Dist.- Katihar.P.S. and Dist.- Katihar.2.Jamil Akhtar …

    3 Pages
  3. Andhra Pradesh High Court 30 December 2008

    WRIT PETITION 6945 of 2002

    6945 of 2002

    APHC010481382009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADAT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)[ESH ] [3483] WRIT APPEAL NO: 127/2009 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Appeal preferred against the order dated 30.12.2008 in W.P.No.6945 of 2002. Between: 1. DOKKULURI …

    11 Pages
  4. Himachal Pradesh High Court 30 December 2008

    CRMMO/99/2005 of P.C.THAKUR Vs SARWAN KUMAR

    99 of 2005

    30.12.2008 Present: Mr. Manish Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. None for the respondent. The main complaint is stated to have been compromised. In view of this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. Accordingly it is dismissed. …

    1 Page
  5. Himachal Pradesh High Court 30 December 2008

    CMPMO/110/2008 of LAJWANTI DEVI Vs F.C. APPEALS

    110 of 2008

    of 2008. 30.12.2008 Present: Pt.Om Parkash, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.1. Mr.Suneet Goel, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 4. CMPMO No.110 of 2008. Heard. It is undisputed before me that the application for …

    2 Pages
  6. Himachal Pradesh High Court 30 December 2008

    CWP/2973/2008 of PYARE LAL Vs STATE

    2973 of 2008

    2973 of 2008. 30.12. 2008 Present: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K.Verma, Dy. A.G. for the respondents. CMP No. 4190 of 2008. Allowed. CMP No. 4191 of 2008. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press …

    1 Page

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead