Filter results by 1
Document types
Courts
- Bombay High Court84016
- Patna High Court80540
- Punjab and Haryana High Court55126
- Telangana High Court53849
- Kerala High Court48607
- Chhattisgarh High Court15231
- Rajasthan High Court13395
- Himachal Pradesh High Court13292
Judges in the latest 300
- Ghulam Mohammed6
- Sessions Judge2
- Kurnool Region2
- S.N.Puram P.S2
- Ranga Reddydistrict2
- V.V.S.Rao1
- Kakkera Krishna Sanjeevi1
- Dandu Jayamma1
Years
Decided between
All courts — latest judgments
191–200 of 390,679 judgments, newest first (0.25 seconds)
-
AS/1567/1998 of X Vs X
Telangana High Court 31 December 2010
SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO A.S.NO.1567 OF 1998 Dated. 31-12-2010 Between: The Land Acquisition Officer, Doulatabad …Appellant Vs. Amerender Reddy ..Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON’BLE
-
SA/755/2010 of Manchala Abraham Vs Manchala Yebu
Telangana High Court 31 December 2010
SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED SECOND APPEAL No. 755 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: This Second Appeal is preferred aggrieved by the decree and judgment dated 12.4.2010 passed in A.S.No. 354 of 2009 by the III Additional District Judge, Guntur confirming the decree and judgment dated 10.07.2009 …
-
CRLP/1125/2009 of Mr. D.R.Reddy, Vs Smt. Shilpa,
Telangana High Court 31 December 2010
P.DURGA PRASAD Crl.P.No.1125 of 2009 O R D E R: The counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Criminal Petition. The petitioner is permitted to withdraw the Criminal Petition. Hence, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with …
-
WP/28322/2010 of Nellore Saraswathi Vs The Director
Telangana High Court 31 December 2010
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH W.P. No.28322 of 2010 Between: Nellore Saraswathi … Petitioner and The Director, Petroleum Planning & Analysis Cell,
-
CRP/6064/2010 of Amirbhai Jamalbhai Vs A.Srivachalam
Telangana High Court 31 December 2010
MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO C.R.P.NO.6064 OF 2010 DATED: 31.12.2010 BETWEEN: Amirbhai Jamalbhai and another .. Petitioners And A /Srivachalam .. Respondent THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO C.R.P.NO.6064 OF 2010 ORDER: Heard Sri G.Krishna MurthY, learned counsel appearing for the
-
AS/352/1999 of SPL.DY.COLLECTOR/LA/SLBC/NALGONDA Vs Y.LACHAIAH AND 14 OTHERS
Telangana High Court 31 December 2010
SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO A.S.NO.352 OF 1999 Dated. 31 -12-2010 Between: Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition Officer, Deverkonda …Appellant Vs. Y.Lachaiah and others ..Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA
-
CRLP/1006/2009 of Haji Pasha, Vs The State of A.P.,
Telangana High Court 31 December 2010
N.RAVI SHANKAR CRL.P.NO.1006 OF 2009 Dt.31.12.2010 Between: Haji Pasha and others ..Petitioners And The State of A.P., rep. by Public Prosecutor and another ..Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR CRL.P.NO.1006 OF 2009 ORDER: Sri Syed Ahmed Ali, learned counsel for the
-
WP/17663/2010 of Ch. Saidulu, Vs The Central Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd.
Telangana High Court 31 December 2010
SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITIONS No. 17663,17672 and 18102 of 2010 COMMON ORDER: Sri V. Brahmaiah Chowdary, learned counsel for the writ petitioners submits that the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, as the writ petitioners have
-
WP/33549/2010 of Brother Maurice, Vs The State of A.P.
Telangana High Court 31 December 2010
SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33549 of 2010 Date: 31.12.2010 Between : Brother Maurice … Petitioner And The State of A.P., rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and others. … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI
Ranga Reddydistrict
-
CRLP/1277/2009 of Veeram Reddy Shankar Reddy, (A1) Vs The State of A.P.,
Telangana High Court 31 December 2010
SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1277 of 2009 O R D E R: Today when the matter is called, none appears for the petitioners and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. This shows that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter. …