Filter precedents
1
Reset all7310 of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLACWP(T) No. 7310 of 2008Decided on: 31.12.2010 Vinod Mahendru …Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge.Whether approved for reporting?[1]. For …
11736 of 2008
31.12.2010 Present: Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Dy. AG for the State. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal states that he does not want to press this petition in view of the reply filed by the respondent-State. Dismissed as not pressed. (Deepak Gupta) …
8983 of 2008
31.12.2010 Present:- Mr. Lokender Thakur, counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Ruma Kaushik, Addl. A.G. for the respondents. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that representation Annexure A-4 of petitioner is pending before respondent No.1, which has not yet been …
11308 of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T)No.11308 of 2008. Joginder Singh Date of decision: 31.12.2010 …. Petitioner Versus State of H.P & ors. Coram: .... Respondents The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, J. Whether approved for reporting ? No For the petitioner …
3078 of 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Inder Pal LPA No.236of 2010 Reserved on : 6.12.2010. Decided on : 31.12.2010 ..…Appellant. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice …
254 of 2000
of 2000 with CR No.139 of 2001 and RSA No.500 of 2008. Continued from previous order. 31.12.2010. Present: As above. In an attempt to concile the matter as per the orders dated 29.12.2010, the parties are present and the matter has been finally and fully settled inter-se the …
11809 of 2008
31.12.2010 Present: . None for the petitioner. Mr.Ajay Chandel, counsel for respondent No.1. Mr.Ramesh Thakur, Dy.AG for the respondent No.2. This case has been called for the second time but none appears for the petitioner. Accordingly the petition is dismissed in default. . …
1692 of 2010
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1692 of 2010 Kichha Sugar Company. … Petitioner. Versus Employees Provident Fund Organization and another … Respondents. Ms. T.A.Khan, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. D.S.Patni, Advocate, learned counsel …
01 of 2010
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Arbitration Application No. 01 of 2010 Continental Construction Ltd. (CCL). ..……… Applicant Versus Government of Uttarakhand & another. .………. Respondents Mr. Sharad Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. B.S. Thind,
420 of 2009
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 420 OF 2009 (S/S) Hari Shankar Srivastava …………Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. ………Respondents. Present: Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Dinesh Gahtori, Standing
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault