Filter precedents
1
Reset allof 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-39503 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: December 30, 2011 Rajwinder Kaur and another. …..Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others. ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR.
177 of 2001
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 177 of 2001-C Date of decision: 30.12.2011. Gurdass Ram, son of Sh. Prem Chand, Res. of Vill. Dussara, Tehsil Amb, Distt. Una (H.P.) Petitioner Versus 1. Director, Consolidation of Holdings, H.P., SHIMLA, H.P. 2a. Daulat Ram} All sons of …
62/3 of 2000
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,SHIMLA. Criminal Revision No.105 of 2006. Date of decision: 30.12.2011. _______________________________________________________ Shri Krishan Thakur S/O Shri Kirpa Ram, resident of Building near S.D.M. residence, V.P.O. Chopal, Tehsil Chopal, Distt. …
1088 of 2011
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.M.P(M) No. 1088 of 2011. Date of decision: 30.12.2011. Dinesh Chand son of late Sh. Atma Ram resident of village Manghra Post Office Devi Dhar, Tehsil Chirgaon, District Shimla, H.P. …..Petitioner. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh …. Respondent.
5363
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C. Review No. 172 of 2011 Date of decision: 30.12.2011 1. State of H.P. through Pr. Secretary(Forests) to the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla 2. The Conservator of Forests, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla. 3. …
70 of 2008
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Cr.MMO No. 70 of 2008 Date of decision: 30.12.2011 Sh. Prem Kalwani S/o Sh. Resident of 92, Sarvodaya Nagar, Indore-452001, Madhya Pradesh. …Petitioner/Accused. Versus 1. M/s Him Tekno Forge Limited, registered office at Sai Road, Baddi …
Bench: Barin Ghosh, J. Barin Ghosh, Uttar Pradesh233 of 2010
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 233 of 2010 (S/B) Sunil Chandra Tripathi and others ….…… Petitioners. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ………. Respondents. Mr. Manoj Tiwari, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manish Basnal, Advocate for the
24 of 2011
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Arbitration Application No. 24 of 2011 Mukand Ltd. ………Applicant. Versus Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. ………Respondent. Mr. Pracheta Singh and Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. I.P. Kohli, Advocate for
1266 of 2011
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 30th day of December, 2011 1st Bail Application No.1266 of 2011 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE Ramroop Singh S/o Chait Ram R/o Gurkhura P.S. Khatima District Udham Singh Nagar.
1043 of 2005
Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. M. S. Tyagi, Advocate for the petitioner. List has been revised. No one appears for the respondent. The plaintiff filed a suit for prohibitory injunction. The petitioner, who is the defendant, appeared and filed the written statement and also …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault