Filter precedents
1
Reset allBench: Garhwal Mandal2895 of 2013
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (MS) No. 2895 of 2013 S.C. Mathur & another. .……….. Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand. ………… Respondent. Mr. Neeraj Garg, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. I.P. Kohli, Standing Counsel for
52 of 2011
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (PIL) No. 52 of 2011 Subhash Goswami and others ……….. Petitioners Versus Union of India and others ……….. Respondents Present: Mr. B.D. Upadhyay, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Bhuwan Bhatt, Advocate for the
2990 of 2013
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (MS) No. 2990 of 2013 Yadram. ……….. Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others. ………… Respondents. Mr. Lalit Tewari, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Tangwan, Brief Holder for the State
230 of 2013
of 2013 in 1st BA No. 1251 of 2013 Hon’ble U.C.Dhyani, J. Mr Ahrar Baig, Advocate, present for the applicant. Mr. S.S.Adhikari, Brief Holder, present for the State. Correction Application No. 230 of 2013 is allowed. As prayed for, learned counsel for the applicant is permitted …
2987 of 2013
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (MS) No. 2987 of 2013 Sarvottam Kumar. ……….. Petitioner Versus Deepika. ………… Respondent. Mr. Lok Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. This writ petition has been filed
1464 of 2012
of 2012 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary, Advocate, present for the petitioner. Mr. Paresh Tripathi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, present for the State/respondent nos. 1, 4, 5 and 6. Mr. N.S. Pundir, Advocate, present for the respondent nos. 2 & …
Bench: Tehri Garhwal2994 of 2013
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (MS) No. 2994 of 2013 Swami Guru Prasad Shishya Swami Janardan.……….. Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand. ………… Respondent. Mr. Sharad Sharma, Senior Advocate, assisted by Ms. Vandana Singh,
2049 of 2013
of 2013 Hon’ble Alok Singh, J. Mr. Manoj Tiwari, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Alok Mahra, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. H.M. Raturi, Addl. C.S.C. for the State. Countered with the objection that lis can be adjudicated by the State Public Service Tribunal, Mr. Manoj …
6980 of 2013
of 2013 Hon’ble V.K.Bist, J. Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. R.K. Sah, A.G.A. with Mr. Vijay Khanduri, Brief Holder for the State. Mr. Sandeep Tandon with Mrs. Sandhna Nishad, Advocate for the respondent no.2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This …
2554 of 2013
of 2013 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Mr. Neeraj Garg, Advocate present for the petitioner. Mr. Paresh Tripathi, Addl. C.S.C. with Mr. Lalit Samant, Brief Holder present for the State. Delay condonation application in filing counter affidavit is allowed. Counter affidavit is …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault