Showing 101–110 of more than 120 judgments, newest first 7.34 seconds

  • Decided from 2020✕
  • Judge: Atarup Banerjee✕
Filter precedents 2 Reset all

CourtsTotal 1

Decision period

Presiding judgeslatest 300

All courts — latest judgments

  1. Calcutta High Court 1 October 2026

    FAT/1141/1993 of JOYMONI BISWAS & ORS. Vs DEBDAS DAS

    Bench: Ravi Krishan Kapur, Atarup BanerjeeFAT/1141/1993

    01, 2026. KAUSHIK. FAT 1141 of 1993 Joymoni Biswas & Ors. Vs. Debdas Das None appears on behalf of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. This matter was appearing in the Warning List and the appellant had sufficient notice that the same would be …

  2. Calcutta High Court 1 October 2026

    FAT/2127/1993 of UMA SHAKAR PRASAD Vs FCI

    Bench: Ravi Krishan Kapur, Atarup BanerjeeFAT/2127/1993

    01, 2026. KAUSHIK. FAT 2127 of 1993 Uma Shakar Prasad Vs. FCI None appears on behalf of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. This matter was appearing in the Warning List and the appellant had sufficient notice that the same would be taken up …

  3. Calcutta High Court 1 October 2026

    FAT/453/1993 of KHOKAN BANERJEE Vs SUSHIL CH SHAW & ORS

    Bench: Ravi Krishan Kapur, Atarup BanerjeeFAT/453/1993

    01, 2026. KAUSHIK. FAT 453 of 1993 Khokan Banerjee Vs. Sushil Ch Shaw & Ors. None appears on behalf of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. This matter was appearing in the Warning List and the appellant had sufficient notice that the same would …

  4. Calcutta High Court 1 October 2026

    FAT/4088/1993 of BANK OF INDIA Vs LALAN RAI AND ORS

    Bench: Ravi Krishan Kapur, Atarup BanerjeeFAT/4088/1993

    Ct. No.17 J.Das FAT 4088 of 1993 Bank of India Vs. Lalan Rai & Ors. 1. None appears on behalf of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. 2. This matter was appearing in the Warning List and the parties are deemed to have had sufficient notice that …

  5. Calcutta High Court 1 October 2026

    FAT/3415/1993 of ARJUN UPADHYAY Vs JAYA BAZAJ

    Bench: Ravi Krishan Kapur, Atarup BanerjeeFAT/3415/1993

    Ct. No.17 J.Das FAT 3415 of 1993 Arjun Upadhyay Vs. Jaya Bazaj 1. None appears on behalf of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. 2. This matter was appearing in the Warning List and the parties are deemed to have had sufficient notice that the …

  6. Calcutta High Court 1 October 2026

    FAT/1623/1993 of MOHAN LAL SEAL Vs PUSPA DAS AND ORS

    Bench: Ravi Krishan Kapur, Atarup BanerjeeFAT/1623/1993

    01, 2026. KAUSHIK. FAT 1623 of 1993 Mohan Lal Seal Vs. Puspa Das & Ors. None appears on behalf of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. This matter was appearing in the Warning List and the appellant had sufficient notice that the same would be …

  7. Calcutta High Court 1 October 2026

    FAT/2259/1993 of RAJ SARKAR Vs UNION BANK OF INDIA

    Bench: Ravi Krishan Kapur, Atarup BanerjeeFAT/2259/1993

    17 Sl. No. 50 RANJAN FAT 2259 of 1993 RAJ SARKAR VS. UNION BANK OF INDIA None appears on behalf of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. This matter was appearing in the Warning List and the appellant had sufficient notice that the same would be …

  8. Calcutta High Court 1 October 2026

    FAT/1267/1993 of ANIL CHANDRA SAHA Vs JAGANNATH BASAK AND ORS

    Bench: Ravi Krishan Kapur, Atarup BanerjeeFAT/1267/1993

    01, 2026. KAUSHIK. FAT 1267 of 1993 Anil Chandra Saha Vs. Jagannath Basak & Ors. None appears on behalf of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. This matter was appearing in the Warning List and the appellant had sufficient notice that the same …

  9. Calcutta High Court 1 October 2026

    FAT/671/1993 of SREE SREE ISWAR CHANDI MATA THAKURANI Vs TARA PRASAD SINGHA & ORS

    Bench: Ravi Krishan Kapur, Atarup BanerjeeFAT/671/1993

    01, 2026. KAUSHIK. FAT 671 of 1993 Sree Sree Iswar Chandi Mata Thakurani Vs. Tara Prasad Singha & Ors. None appears on behalf of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. This matter was appearing in the Warning List and the appellant had sufficient …

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead