Showing 31–40 of more than 50 judgments, newest first 6.70 seconds

  • Judge: Arun Kumar✕
Filter precedents 1 Reset all

CourtsTotal 2

Decision period

Principal bench / seatlatest 300

Presiding judgeslatest 300

All courts — latest judgments

  1. Allahabad High Court 7 October 2026

    BAIL/35965/2026 of SHADAB Vs STATE OF U.P.

    Bench: Arun Kumar Singh DeshwalBAIL/35965/2026

    JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35965 of 2026 Court No. - 66 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Jitendra Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rakesh Kumar Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The …

  2. Allahabad High Court 7 October 2026

    BAIL/35162/2026 of TALIB Vs STATE OF U.P.

    Bench: Arun Kumar Singh DeshwalBAIL/35162/2026

    JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35162 of 2026 Court No. - 66 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Mohd Yasir, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Quasim Khan, learned counsel for the first informant, Sri Bhupendra Pal Singh, learned …

  3. Allahabad High Court 7 October 2026

    BAIL/23200/2025 of SMT RAJESH ALIAS DHAKELI Vs STATE OF U.P.

    Bench: Arun Kumar Singh DeshwalBAIL/23200/2025

    JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23200 of 2025 Court No. - 66 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Application is allowed. 2. For order, see the order of date passed in CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1629 of 2026. October 8, 2026 S.C. …

  4. Allahabad High Court 7 October 2026

    BAIL/35101/2026 of FAIZ Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

    Bench: Arun Kumar Singh DeshwalBAIL/35101/2026

    JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35101 of 2026 Court No. - 66 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. No one appeared on behalf of the first informant despite service of notice by the police. 2. Heard Sri Mukesh Joshi, counsel for the applicant, Sri …

  5. Allahabad High Court 7 October 2026

    SPLA/326/2024 of HDFC BANK Vs MS KUSUM ENTERPRISES, THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SRI BHOLA NATH MAURYA AND 5 OTHERS

    Bench: Rajan Roy, Arun KumarSPLA/326/2024

    JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 326 of 2024 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. Shri Sanjay Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the appellant states that the appeal has lost its efficacy with efflux of time. 2. The appeal is, accordingly …

  6. Allahabad High Court 7 October 2026

    SPLA/740/2022 of ANANYA SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

    Bench: Rajan Roy, Arun KumarSPLA/740/2022

    JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 740 of 2022 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. List has been revised. None appears for the appellant. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. October 8, 2026 Shanu Versus Counsel for …

  7. Allahabad High Court 7 October 2026

    BAIL/36052/2026 of RISHABH MISHRA @ KANHAI Vs STATE OF U.P.

    Bench: Arun Kumar Singh DeshwalBAIL/36052/2026

    JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36052 of 2026 Court No. - 66 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Sudhanshu, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Dhananjay Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rakesh Kumar Mishra, learned A.G.A. for …

  8. Allahabad High Court 7 October 2026

    BAIL/36077/2026 of PANCHSHREE @ PANCHALI Vs STATE OF U.P.

    Bench: Arun Kumar Singh DeshwalBAIL/36077/2026

    JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36077 of 2026 Court No. - 66 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Aushim Luthra, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Himanshu Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant …

  9. Allahabad High Court 7 October 2026

    SPLA/319/2024 of SUNIL UPADHYAY Vs State of UP AND 5 OTHERS

    Bench: Rajan Roy, Arun KumarSPLA/319/2024

    JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 319 of 2024 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. Heard Ms. Neetu Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and learned State Counsel for State respondents. 2. The appellant herein had filed a writ petition …

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead