Central Administrative Tribunal

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA vs KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN (KVS) on 28 October 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

Central Administrative Tribunal

Principal Bench, New Delhi

O.A. No. 251/2026

This the 28th day of October, 2026

Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA S/o Late Shri Ram Prasad Shukla, aged about 64 years R/o House no — 36, Mohalla Ram Nagar, Opposite Ambedkar Nagar, Block — A, Near Eye Hospital, Sitapur — 261001 (Uttar Pradesh). Retired from the post of TGT

(Sanskrit), K.V. Sitapur (Uttar Pradesh) Group-B

... Applicant

(By Advocate: Mr. Vipul Diwakar)

Versus

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

1

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (HQ), 18- Institutional Area, Shaheed Jeet Singh Marg, New Delhi — 110016. Through its Commissioner

2. Joint Commissioner (Finance.) Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (HQ), 18- Institutional Area, Shaheed Jeet Singh Marg, New Delhi — 110016.

3. Finance Officer Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (HQ), 18- Institutional Area, Shaheed Jeet Singh Marg, New Delhi - 110016. ... Respondents (By Advocate: Mr. UN Singh)

DEEKSHA DHINGRA

O R D E R (ORAL)

Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)

In the present Original Application filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicants seek the following reliefs:- “(i) That this application may kindly be allowed; and

(ii) That the Hon’ble Tribunal may quash the impugned letter dated 09-12-2025 issued by the respondents. (Annex. - A/1).

(iii) That the respondents may be directed to allow the services of the applicant governed by the GPF cum Pension Scheme w.e.f. 01-09-1988 in pursuant to the Para-3 of OM dated 01-09-1988 (Annex. -A/2). The respondents may be directed to pay full pension benefits to the applicant with arrears & interest @ 18% P.A.

(iv) That the action of the respondents considering the applicant services governed by the CPF after 01-09- 1988 even in the absence of any option form be declared illegal.

(v) That the services of the applicant may be declared governed by the GPF and may be held entitle for the retiral/pension benefits under the GPF Scheme.

(vi) Any other order/directions of relief may be granted in favour of the applicant which may be deemed just and proper under the facts and circumstances of this case."

2. During the hearing, learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the respondents agree that the present matter can be disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the claims of the

DEEKSHA DHINGRA

applicant in the light of the judgment dated 02.09.2025 passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in Bharti Bahuguna v. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Ors., W.P.(C) No. 3172/2019 and connected matters, reported as 2025:DHC:7629-DB. In the said judgment, the Hon’ble High Court considered the claims of the employees falling in three categories and granted relief in respect of their entitlement under the GPF-cum-Pension Scheme. The applicant herein admittedly fall in one of the said categories, which is not in dispute.

3. It is, however, noted that the aforesaid judgment is presently under challenge before the Hon’ble Supreme Court and the issue arising therefrom is pending consideration. The proceedings before the Hon’ble Supreme Court are, therefore, likely to have a bearing upon the claims of the applicants.

4. In view of the aforesaid position, and with the consent of both parties, the present O.A. is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the claims of the applicants in accordance with law, keeping in view the judgment dated 02.09.2025 passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in Bharti Bahuguna v. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Ors., 2025:DHC:7629-DB.

DEEKSHA DHINGRA

However, any decision taken in respect of the applicants shall remain subject to the final outcome of the proceedings pending before the Hon’ble Supreme Court arising from the aforesaid judgment and shall abide by the final decision rendered therein.

5. There shall be no order as to costs.

(Manish Garg) Member (J)

/dd /

DEEKSHA DHINGRA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead