Filter precedents
2
Reset allBench: Drat ChennaiMISC APPLICATION/121/2019
CONTD. ORDER-SHEET CASE No DATE MA 171 / 19 16/06t77 REMARK None for the Appticants Shri Sanjeev Dubey, Adv for Respondent Respondent Counsel apprised the Bench that this A{A has become infrustous and also submits that the appticants have fited this /v1A for setting aside …
Bench: Drat ChennaiMISC APPLICATION/50/2021
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET PAGE No CASE No DATE REMARK M 50/71 13/06/22 DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER None for the Appticants Shri Ashish Dixit, Adv for the Non-appticant This lv\A has been fited by the applicants against the judgment dated 10/01/20 by this Tribunat under the OA No.926l18 …
Bench: Drat Chennai
GONTD. ORDER.SHEET DATE 9.\'c. r res 07.06.2022 PAGE No CASE No REi/IARK DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER 2022 3rfr-drQff qer o1 3rtr t fr {r$pl ffiTmT 3rfBq+dT scRera t Gr-rln<o +6 d far * rfi"T ilCfr 3lFU.lsot sqRard t 'rorqfr @16 2 vq 3 01 enq t ot{ sqRerd rfr t 3Trlc6 3ilftf,6 dqGT …
Bench: Drat ChennaiIA/1/2022
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET DATE fr.s PAGE No. . CASE No REMARK 31.Os.202 DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER 1 / 2022 qE iq-{ erfta 3Trs ti rrqer Eiliri tg nqgn o1 ,r-$ t 3rq-arfr qer rfr eis d aft qr.ial HI ror srf}+Eor sqRero t sf,{srfr iaqt6 1 qa6 gffirry I sorqrft iarlr,o 2 d fil\ eft rfi,r …
Bench: Drat Chennai
CONTD. ORDER€HEET DATE PAGE No CASE No REIARK NDN1228/21 18t05t22 DESCRIPTIOI{ OF THE ORDER Appticant by Shri Wajid Hyder, Advocate Respondent No.-1 by Shri Rajesh Chouhan, Advocate None for Respondent No. -2 By this order the issue with regard to deposit of deficit Court Fee of …
Bench: Drat ChennaiMISC APPLICATION/80/2017
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET DATE PAGE No CASE No REMARK DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER Shri Priyankush Jain, Adv for the Applicant Shri Sunit Kherdikar, Adv for the respondent At the very outset appticant counsel apprised the Bench that dispute/matter has been settled amicably between the …
Bench: Drat ChennaiMISC APPLICATION/9/2020
t, sheet dated 71 /01/2 by nts. the taking steps to effect servtce upon the non -ap p iica from rrOi Even today, the Appticant remained absent proceedings. lt appears that the Applicant is nterest to prosecute the case comptiance of order q Idated 21 101 /20 and for want of …
Bench: Drat ChennaiMISC APPLICATION/26/2021
CONTD. ORDER-SHEET DATE vq. 28.0 Q8lq lrozz PAGE No CASE No REMARK DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER .26 / 21 2022 fr ccrro orq-{rd srB{ffir Er{-< Hifr eTfuf,ffir d fuc sqRerdr oTRfrq frft-f, GrD-f,ffir d'o +1 n-rr t s-qfurot smriffi qa o1 frs t ffi eri fi sTrqfu m G tn, enq rfr oncfu fr …
Bench: Drat ChennaiMISC APPLICATION/35/2021
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET OATE REMARK DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER gq.q. 35,/21 26.M.2.22 enteo g:r{r fr fraE ftA qk+wrt !flqrtf,o 6qfo 1 dRI fr .ilcrd $.RtrltEI 3TE{ffi',t a-,iw z vq 3 grfl fr ffi-d ffi{mr erfue-ffrt 3i-{ri{o q\@ 4 t z am d} 3lftYs o.-+fuqr erfu+mrt 1. srrrl cer o\ …
Bench: Drat ChennaiMISC APPLICATION/65/2018
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET DATE PAGE No CASE No REMARK MA 65/18 25/04/72 DESCRIPTION OF THE OROER Therefore this i A is dismissed for wants of prosecution. Record be consigned in the record room. (Ram Niwas Patet) Presiding officer None for the Applicant None for the Respondent Looking …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault