Filter results by 2

Courts

Judges in the latest 36

Years

Decided between

2001-01-01 and 2001-12-31 · clear

Clear all filters

Gauhati High Court — latest judgments

1–10 of 36 judgments, newest first (0.06 seconds)

  1. WP(C)/6104/2001 of MD ISMAIL ALI and ORS Vs STATE OF ASSAM and ORS

    Gauhati High Court 31 December 2001

    BEFORE HON’BLR MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA. Heard Mr. S. Medhi, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Ms R. Chakraborty, learned State counsel. This writ petition was filed in the year 2001 for a direction to the res pondents to set aside and quash the impugned action on …

  2. Crl.A./180/2001 of STATE OF ASSAM Vs SOLEMN SHEIKH

    Gauhati High Court 31 December 2001

    BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE U. B. SAHA The instant appeal is filed by the State of Assam under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment and order dated 03.02.2000, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Goalpara in Sessions Case No. 48/1997 whereby and w …

  3. Crl.A./188/2001 of BADAL MAL Vs STATE OF ASSAM

    Gauhati High Court 31 December 2001

    BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE U. B. SAHA The instant appeal is filed by the accused/ appellant, Shri Badal Mal, under Sec tions 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and or der dated 31.05.2000, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Cachar, Silchar, in …

  4. WP(C)/6188/2001 of M/S BHATTER SIZING and WEAVING M Vs STATE OF ASSAM and ORS

    Gauhati High Court 31 December 2001

    BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Mr. N. Dhar, learned counsel for the petitioners. None appears for the res pondents. 2. This case pertains to the efforts at revival of the Swahid Kushal Konwar Samabay Sutakol Ltd. (in short — the Mill ), which becomes …

  5. WP(C)/856/2001 of PRADIP KUMAR SINGH @ RAJKUMAR Vs STATE OF ASSAM and ORS

    Gauhati High Court 31 December 2001

    BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Mr. S. Borthakur, learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instruction, submits that the petitioner does not want to press the writ petition. Ms. R. Cho kraborty, learned State counsel is present. Consequently, the writ petition is …

  6. Crl.A./187/2001 of SARAFAT ALI Vs STATE OF ASSAM and ORS

    Gauhati High Court 31 December 2001

    BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE U. B. SAHA The instant appeal is filed by the informant/ appellant under Sections 374(2) an d 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment and order dated 03. 06.2000, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Marigaon in Sessions Case No. …

  7. Crl.A./177/2000 of STATE OF ASSAM and ORS Vs JABBAR ANSARI

    Gauhati High Court 31 December 2001

    BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE U. B. SAHA The instant appeal is filed by the State of Assam under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment and order dated 04.02.2000, passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dibrugarh in G.R. Case No. 1915/1997 whereby and …

  8. RSA/40/2001 of SACHINDRA SAHARIA and ORS Vs SMTI SABITRI DEKA and ANR

    Gauhati High Court 31 December 2001

    BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE BP KATAKEY JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) This appeal by the defendants in Title Suit No. 6/1997 is direct ed against the judgment and decree dated 3.1.2001 passed by the learned District Judge, Darrang at Mongoldoi in Title Appeal No. 4/1999 dismissing …

  9. Crl.A./193/2001 of MISS SAFIJAN NESSA Vs MD TAMJID ALI

    Gauhati High Court 31 December 2001

    BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Office note dated 4.7.01 shows that the Criminal Appeal was filed with several d efects. The defects have not been cured for last 9 years and none is present on behalf of the appellant to submit as to when the defects would be cured. …

  10. WP(C)/3920/2001 of DR BIMAN NATUNG and ORS Vs UNION OF INDIA and ORS

    Gauhati High Court 31 December 2001

    BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR MADAN B LOKUR HON’BLE MR JUSTICE BP KATAKEY The grievance of the petitioner (an employee of the Central Administrative Tribu nal) is that pursuant to an observation made in the impugned order of the Tribun al to the effect that the petitioner

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead