Filter precedents
2
Reset allBench: Virinder AggarwalCRM-M/37867/2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (101) CRM-M-37867-2026 Date of Decision:-27.08.2026 HARMANDEEP SINGH … Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Amit Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Baljinder …
Bench: Virinder AggarwalCRM-M/37837/2026
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-37837-2026 Date of Decision: 27.08.2026 RYTHEM ...Petitioner Vs. UT CHANDIGARH ...Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Hunarveer Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Bansal, PP. …
Bench: Virinder AggarwalCRM-M/48021/2026
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 124 CRM-M-48021-2026 Date of Decision: 27.08.2026 SUMANDEEP KAUR AND OTHERS ... PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Prince Sharma, Advocate for …
Bench: Virinder AggarwalCRWP/10318/2026
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 116 CRWP-10318-2026 Date of Decision: 27.08.2026 KANTA DEVI @ KANTA AHLADIA ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Anil Mehta, Advocate and Mr …
Bench: Virinder AggarwalCRM-M/39565/2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (140) CRM-M-39565-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:-27.08.2026 HARMAN SINGH BHASIN … Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Shashikant Singh …
Bench: Virinder AggarwalCRM-M/40928/2026
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-40928-2026 Date of Decision: 27.08.2026 SUNNY KUMAR ...Petitioner Vs. STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Karan Sachdeva, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Karan Veer …
Bench: Virinder AggarwalCRM-M/31491/2026
-2- statement to the effect that he would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused-petitioner is quashed. 4. The trial Court has annexed the statements of the parties in original, along with its report. 5. Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other accused …
Bench: Virinder AggarwalCRM-M/48225/2026
I attest to the accuracy and integrity of
Bench: Virinder AggarwalCRM-M/34529/2026
-2- 4. Learned State counsel on instructions states that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required for custodial interrogation. 5. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the petition is allowed and the interim order dated 24.06.2026 is made …
Bench: Virinder AggarwalCRM-M/45189/2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (103) CRM-M-45189-2026 Date of Decision:-27.08.2026 X … Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Shalender Mohan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ramesh Kumar …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault