Uttarakhand High Court — latest judgments

1. BA2/117/2009 of YATINDRA CHAUSHARY Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

   Uttarakhand High Court 31 December 2009

   Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State. First bail application was rejected on merit by this Court vide order dated 11.6.2009.. No fresh ground or argument has been raised by learned Counsel for the accused

2. C482/1021/2009 of RAJESH KUMAR Vs PRINCIPAL JUDGE FAMILY COURT AND ORS

   Uttarakhand High Court 31 December 2009

   Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Mr. K.S. Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State. Learned Counsel for the petitioner stated that he filed this petition by mistake as against the impugned order, revision is maintainable. He seeks permission to …

3. WPMS/1295/2009 of JASWANT SINGH Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND and ANOTHER

   Uttarakhand High Court 31 December 2009

   UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1295 of 2009 (M/S) Jaswant Singh … Petitioner .. Versus State of Uttarakhand & others … Respondents Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent

4. WPSB/303/2009 of MADHUBALA DHEEMAN Vs UNION OF INDIA and OTHERS

   Uttarakhand High Court 31 December 2009

   COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 303 of 2009 Madhubala Dheeman, D/o Sri Jyoti Swaroop, Presently working as Sister, Government Joint Hospital, Roorkee. …..……Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India through Secretary, Public Grievances and Pension, New Delhi. 2.

5. SPA/190/2009 of SMT MEENA SINGH and ANOTHER Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND and OTHERS

   Uttarakhand High Court 31 December 2009

   COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Special Appeal No. 190 of 2009 Smt. Svita Pathak .……… Appellant Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ….Respondents Mr. Ganesh Kandpal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. P.C. Bisht, Advocate for the respondents. Coram: Hon’ble

   J.S. Khehar, J. J.S. Khehar

6. WPMS/2246/2009 of PANCH DASNAM AAHWAN AKHADA and OTHERS Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND and OTHERS

   Uttarakhand High Court 31 December 2009

   COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2246 OF 2009 (MS) Shri Panch Dasnam Aahwan Akhada and others. …………Petitioners. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …….Respondents. Mr. A.K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay,

7. BA1/1071/2009 of CHEEKU @ QADAR Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

   Uttarakhand High Court 31 December 2009

   COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Criminal Ist Bail Application No.1071 of 2009 Order on the Bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Cheeku @ Qadar ……….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ------- Opposite party

8. WPCRL/132/2009 of SUBHASH CHANDRA PANDEY AND ORS Vs STATE AND ORS

   Uttarakhand High Court 31 December 2009

   Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. (Delay Condn. Appln. No.11430/09) None is present for the petitioners. Sri M.A. Khan, learned brief holder for the State. Perused the application supported by affidavit. Delay in filing the counter affidavit is condoned. Delay condonation application is …

9. WPMS/2239/2009 of PIYUSH SHARMA Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND and OTHERS

   Uttarakhand High Court 31 December 2009

   UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 2239 of 2009 (M/S) Piyush Sharma … Petitioner .. Versus State of Uttarakhand & others … Respondents Mr. A.V. Pundir, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of

10. WPCRL/527/2009 of VED PRAKASH BANSAL Vs STATE and OTHERS

    Uttarakhand High Court 31 December 2009

    Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. None is present for the petitioner. Sri M.A. Khan, learned brief holder for the State, who makes a statement at bar that as per the information received by him, after completion of investigation, final report has been filed in the matter. In view of the …