Filter precedents
1
Reset allBench: A.K. Sarkar
Case: VALIA PEEDIKAKKANDI KUTHEESSA UMMA AND OTHERS versus PATHAKKALAN NARAVANATH KUMHAMU AND OTHERS [[1964] 4 S.C.R. 549] (1964) Section: BODY --- .. 4; s.c.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS ' . ' . . ; . . prevents the punishing authority from taking th;it fact into consideration …
Bench: P.B. Gajendragadkar
Case: STATE OF MYSORE versus K. MANCHE GOWDA [[1964] 4 S.C.R. 540] (1964) Section: SECTION t • - J,~ .. \"\~.- ·./ .. . _ · \' : s4ci · ' ' SUP~ OOURT REPORTS '. .~ '' ... -, ' . '\ -carefully, and Cxamined it in the light of the criticism of- . fcrc;d by. counsel for Noor …
Bench: K. Subba Rao
Case: GURAMMA BHRATAR CHANBASAPPA DESHMUKH AND ANOTHER versus MALAPPA [[1964] 4 S.C.R. 497] (1964) Section: BODY ' • ,,___, evidence being given. This case turned on wholly diffe-rent facts and is of no assistance. We may also refer to, In re N atesan ([1 ]) where it was …
Bench: A.K. Sarkar
Case: NOOR KHAN versus ST ATE OF RAJASTHAN [[1964] 4 S.C.R. 521] (1964) Section: BODY 4 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 5, the legal representative,s ©f defendant 7 and def. 8, except to the extent of the 8th defendant's right to maintenance under Ex. 371, is dismissed with costs. …
Bench: A.K. Sarkar
Case: STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH versus SINGHARA SINGH AND OTHERS [[1964] 4 S.C.R. 485] (1964) Section: CONCLUSION ST A TE OF UTT AR PRADESH ti. SINGHARA SINGH AND OTHERS (A. K. SARKAR, M. HIDAYATULLAH AND J. c. SHAH, JJ.) Crin1inal Procedure-Evidence-Respondents accused of …
Bench: Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha
Case: STATE OF ORISSA versus M.A. TULLOCH AND CO. [[1964] 4 S.C.R. 461] (1964) Section: BODY SUPREME COURT REPORTS STATE OF ORISSA v. M.A. TULLOCH AND CO. (AND CONNECTED APPEAL) (B. P. SINHA C. J., K. SuBBA RAo, RAGHUBAR DAYAL, N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR AND J. R. MuDHOLKAR, JJ.) …
Bench: S.K. Das
Case: GHANSHYAM DAS versus REGIONAL ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, NAGPUR [[1964] 4 S.C.R. 436] (1964) Section: BODY 1963 August 16 436 SUPREME COURT REPORTS GHANSHYAM DAS v. REGIONAL ASSIST ANT COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, NAGPUR (S. K. DAs, AcTING C.J., K. SuBBA RAO …
WPSS No.377/09 Hon’ble Rajiv Sharma, J. Mr. Prabhat Bohara, Advocate holding brief of Mr. P.S. Bohara, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.P. Sah, S.C. for the State. Ms. Beena Pandey, Addl. CSC for the State of U.P. Petitioner’s father was appointed on 14.8.1963 as an Assistant …
Bench: P.B. Gajendragadkar
Case: ALUMINIUM CORPORATION versus THEIR WORKMEN AND ORS. [[1964] 4 S.C.R. 429] (1964) Section: BODY y of its powers under s. 115 of the Code. The appeals must therefore fail and I agree with the order proposed by my learned brother Shah, J. Appeals dismissed. • [ALUMINIUM …
Bench: Bhuvneshwar Prasad Sinha
Case: LACHMAN UTAMCHAND KIRPALANI versus MEENA ALIAS MOTA [[1964] 4 S.C.R. 331] (1964) Section: BODY 4 S.C.R. section came into force, and clearly the amended provision applies to the suit and governs the decision of the dispute between the parties. If that is so, the plain …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault