Filter precedents
1
Reset allBench: H.H.Mehta4127 of 1998
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No 504 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE H.H.MEHTA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? …
Bench: S.K.Keshote986 of 2000
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 986 of 2000 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? …
751 of 2000
F SAL- OT F R I c. "I 111'& ?• et.49 Ns'ne ^?^--?T5~$..^rg^T Father's nsme •^i3)3TS"''^c^r ( Resj'aence An^f^^-vy?' 'W;'^' •^'X l. CF0000062928 •! ^ C Seatenced to •^E<TC-tX '^Sff 1Cder section •307^ ^ffi-^ ^•5^'^^ S"zt/^ ^^ ;; ai-^Uiii^i
Petition No. 140 of 2000(S/S) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner wants this Court to issue a mandamus commanding the opposite parties to transfer his wife from Ranikhet to Almora where the petitioner is working. The husband and wife both are in
Petition No. 153 of 2000(S/S) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel. Transfer is an exigency of service and no interference is called for by this Court but keeping in view the fate of the students it is directed that the
Petition No. 137 of 2000(S/S) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Chief Standing Counsel. Transfer is an exigency of service. No case is made out for interference. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. Dt. 12.12.2000 Sd/-
Bench: G.B. Pattanaik
Case: K.R. LAKSHMAN AND ORS. versus KARNATAKA ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ORS. [[2000] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 535] (2000) Section: BODY K.R. LAKSHMAN AND ORS. v. KARNATAKA ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ORS. DECEMBER 12, 2000 [G.B. PATTANAIK AND B.N. AGRA WAL, JJ.] A B Service Law Karnataka …
Bench: S. Rajendra Babu
Case: INDIAN AIRLINES LTD. AND ORS. versus S. GOPALAKRISHNAN [[2000] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 548] (2000) Section: BODY A INDIAN AIRLINES LTD. AND ORS. v. S. GOPALAKRISHNAN DECEMBER 12, 2000 B [S. RAJENDRA BABU AND SHIVARAJ V. PATIL, JJ.] Service Law Appointment-To the post of Junior …
Bench: S. Rajendra Babu
Case: KHATEMA FIBRES LTD. versus STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR. [[2000] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 568] (2000) Section: SECTION A KHATEMA FIBRES LTD. v. ST A TE OF UTT AR PRADESH AND ANR. DECEMBER 12, 2000 B [S. RAJENDRA BABU AND R.C. LAHOTI, JJ.] U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948-Section …
Bench: S. Rajendra Babu
Case: R. DURAISWAMY AND ORS. versus DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND ORS. [[2000] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 565] (2000) Section: BODY R. DURAISWAMY AND ORS. v. DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND ORS. A DECEMBER 12, 2000 [S. RAJENDRA BABU AND SHIVARAJ V. PATIL, JJ.] B Service law : Disparity …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault