Filter results by 1

Courts

Judges in the latest 300

Years

Decided between

2002-01-01 and 2002-12-31 · clear

Clear all filters

All courts — latest judgments

191–200 of 9,902 judgments, newest first (0.25 seconds)

  1. BA1/1268/2002 of FIROJ and ANR. Vs STATE

    Uttarakhand High Court 21 December 2002

    COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital the 21st day of December, 2002 Criminal Misc. Bail Application Number 1268 of 2002 Order on the Bail Application CRIMINAL SIDE (1) Firoj son of Mohd. Ahmad and (2) Sabir son of Shahjady Ali, residents of …

  2. BA1/1347/2002 of HARI @ HARI BHADUR Vs STATE

    Uttarakhand High Court 21 December 2002

    COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital the 21st day of December, 2002 Criminal Misc. Bail Application Number 1347 of 2002 Order on the Bail Application CRIMINAL SIDE Hari alias Hari Bhadur son of Sri Kishan Bhadur, resident of village Chiddarwala …

  3. BA1/1353/2002 of RISHI RAM Vs STATE

    Uttarakhand High Court 21 December 2002

    COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital the 21st day of December, 2002 Criminal Misc. Bail Application Number 1353 of 2002 Order on the Bail Application CRIMINAL SIDE Rishi Ram son of Sri Mukh Ram, resident of village Garh, P.S. Ranipur, District …

  4. WPMS/1294/2002 of RAJESH KANDPAL Vs CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ALMORA and ORS

    Uttarakhand High Court 21 December 2002

    1294 of 2002 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri P.S. Bist learned counsel for the petitioner. This petition has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer that the respondent no. 1 may be directed to dispose of the divorce petition pending before him. The C.J. M. Almora is …

  5. CRLR/140/2002 of IDRIS Vs STATE and ANOTHER

    Uttarakhand High Court 21 December 2002

    of 2002 Hon’ble Irshad Hussain J. Heard the learned counsel for the revisionist and the learned Government Advocate. Perused the copy of the impugned judgment and order dated 11.10.2002 by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Hardwar. The revisionist-husband could not file the …

  6. WPMS/1317/2002 of UTTARANCHAL FOREST DEVELOPMENT andANOTHER Vs P.O. LABOUR COURT and ANOTHER

    Uttarakhand High Court 21 December 2002

    COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting (chapter VIII, Rule 32 (2) (b)) Description of case WPMS No. 7009 of 2001; decided on 25-3-03 along with similar matters UP Forest Development Corp. Vs. PO Labour Court A.F.R. …

  7. WPMS/1323/2002 of UTTARANCHAL FOREST DEVELOPMENT andANOTHER Vs P.O. LABOUR COURT and ANOTHER

    Uttarakhand High Court 21 December 2002

    COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting (chapter VIII, Rule 32(2) (b)) Description of case MS No. 7009 of 2001 ; decided on 25-3-03 along with similar matters UP Forest Development Corp. Vs. PO Labour Court A.F.R. …

  8. SCA/12039/2002 of SHAH BOSKI JAYESHKUMAR Vs REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER

    Gujarat High Court 21 December 2002

    HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 12039 of 2002 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? …

  9. WTR/33/1991 of TANMANBEN B PATEL Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

    Gujarat High Court 21 December 2002

    HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD WEALTH TAX REFERENCE No 33 of 1991 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE and HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.MEHTA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to …

    A.R.Dave

  10. WTR/30/1991 of DHANSUKHLAL GAFURBHAI PATE Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

    Gujarat High Court 21 December 2002

    HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD WEALTH TAX REFERENCE No 30 of 1991 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE and HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.MEHTA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to …

    A.R.Dave

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead