Filter precedents
1
Reset all534 of 2003
534 of 2003 (S/B) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard Shri Manoj Tiwari learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding …
1092 of 2003
COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 18th day of December 2003 Bail Application No.1092 of 2003 Order on the bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Khim Singh S/o late Chandra Singh R/o Village Khumti Tok Kotajia Thana Joljeebi Tehsil …
301 of 2003
COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 22nd day of December 2003 Bail Application No. 301 of 2003 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE 1. Pyare 2. Rodha Both S/o Somma R/o village- Dadubanas, P.S. Bhagwanpur ……….
1438 of 2003
UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL (Court’s order whether the case is not approved for reporting.) (Chapter VIII Rule 32 (2)(b) Description of the case. W.P. No. 1438 of 2003 (SS) Kumaon Van Sharmik Sangh vs. Chief Conservator Approved for reporting. ________________ Not approved for …
671 of 2003
of 2003 Hon. P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J. By means of this writ petition the petitioner has made the following prayers:- Prayer A is based on newspaper cutting, therefore, we are not in a position of adjudicate the Notification published in the newspaper as the …
1140 of 2003
of 2003 Hon. P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard Mrs. Pushpa Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the First Information Report dated 11.4.2000. It discloses cognizable offence and the allegations made therein are inherently probable. Therefore we are …
670 of 2003
of 2003 Hon. P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J. By means of this writ petition the petitioner has made the following prayers:- Prayer A is based on newspaper cutting, therefore, we are not in a position of adjudicate the Notification published in the newpaper as the …
1044 of 2003
COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting. (Chapter VIII, Rule 32 (2) (b) Description of the Case. CRLA No. 1044 of 2003 . decided on 22-12-03 Dev Singh & others Vs State Approved for reporting ______________________ Not …
688 of 2001
of 2001 Hon. P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J. This writ petition has been filed against the recovery certificate issued by the respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has paid the entire amount. Despite the payment the recovery certificate has …
1141 of 2003
of 2003 Hon. P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. V.B.S. Negi learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 and Mr. K.P. Upadhayaya learned Standing Counsel for the State. In view of the judgment of the Allahabad …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault