Filter precedents
1
Reset allCOURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting Chapter VIII, Rule 32(2) (b) Description of case Criminal Appeal No.25 of 2003 With Criminal Appeal No.26 of 2003 Date of decision: 24.12.2004 For the approval of : Hon’ble Mr. …
Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J Heard Sri Alok Mehra, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel who has accepted notices on behalf of all the respondents. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing …
(SS) 2004 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J Heard Sri Navneet Kaushik, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel, who has accepted notices on behalf of respondents. Both the parties are agreed to decide the writ petition at its admission stage itself. By means of …
(M/S) Old No. 23624/95 Hon'ble Rajesh Tandon, J. File has been transferred from Allahabad High Court. None appears for the parties. It appears that by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructous. Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, liberty is given to …
356 of 2001
COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Chapter VIII, Rule 32(2) (b) Description of case Writ petition No. 356 of 2001 Murari Lal Shah ……… Petitioner. Versus IV A.D.J. and others……………. Respondents. Date of decision: 24, December 2004 For the
2004 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal,J. Heard Sri Mangal Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for the applicant/ petitioner. Hearing upon learned counsel for the applicant it revealed that the petitioner could not show the reasons as to how the respondents have defies the order passed by this …
1359 of 2004
of 2004 Hon. P.C. Pant, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. By means of this petition, the petitioner has challenged order/finding dated 10.12.2004 given on issue no. 4 in civil suit no. 144 of 2001 where by the learned trial court has refused to stay the proceedings of …
(ms) of 2001 Old No. 38390/1998 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. File has been transferred from Allahabad High Court. None appears for the parties. It appears that by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous. Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, liberty …
1362 of 2004
1362 of 2004 Hon. P.C. Pant, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. By means of this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 09.12.2004 passed by learned Civil Judge (Jr. division), Nainital whereby the application of the defendant was allowed and the Civil …
Bench: Irshad Hussain
Court of Uttaranchal, at Nainital. Chapter VIII, Rule 32(2) (b) Description of case. Writ Petition No. 1521 (S/B) of 2002 Chandra Shekhar Jain Vs. U.P. Jal Nigam and others. Date of decision: 24th December, 2004 For the approval of : Hon’ble Mr. Justice Irshad Hussain, J. …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault