Filter precedents
1
Reset allHIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Criminal Revision No.175 of 2002 Date of decision: 26.12.2008 Hari Chand …Petitioner Vs State of H.P. ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner: Mr. Vinay
of 2008. 26.12.2008 Present: Mr. Bimal Gupta, counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Ruma Kaushik, Addl. AG, for respondent No. 1. Mr. Virender Singh , counsel for respondent No. 2. This revision petition has been preferred against the order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge …
386 of 2006
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Appeal From Order No. 386 of 2006 The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. …Appellant Versus Kumari Ashmita Pant & others …Respondents Mr. V.K. Kohli, senior Advocate assisted by Mr. I.P. Kohli, Advocate for appellant Mr. Anant Kumar Agrawal, Advocate
853 of 2008
application No. 7135/08 In WPCRL No. 853 of 2008 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. None appears for the petitioners, though called twice. Mr. Nandan Arya, learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand-respondent Nos. 1 to 4. The Criminal Writ petition is …
2238 of 2008
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 2238 of 2008 (M/S) Om Prakesh & another. …………. Petitioners Versus Ranveer Singh. …………. Respondent Mr. A . Rab, Advocate for the petitioners. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. After hearing
502 of 2008
CLMA 8900/2008 in A.O. No. 502/2008 UHon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. Heard Mr. T.A. Khan, learned counsel for the appellant on the delay condonation application and perused the affidavit filed in support thereto. The delay has not satisfactorily been explained. The delay condonation …
8463 of 2008
App. No.8463/2008 Urgency App. No. 3141/2008 WPMS No.2157/2008 Hon’ble J.C. S. Rawat, J. Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondent. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file appeal before …
1047 of 2008
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 26th December, 2008 1st Bail Application No. 1047 of 2008 Order on the bail application of the accused. Smt. Chando @ Chandrawati W/o Shri Nathhu Singh ….Applicant Verus State of Uttarakhand ….Opposite …
930 of 2007
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.930 of 2007 (M/S) Smt. Nathi Devi ……………. Petitioner. Versus Prescribed Authority/1st Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Dehradun and another. ………… Respondents.
409 of 2008
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 409 of 2008 Salim and others …… Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …… Respondents None for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Rajendra Singh,
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault