Filter precedents
1
Reset all349 of 2008
in A.O. No. 349/2008 UHon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. List has been revised. None has appeared on behalf of the appellants. The defects pointed out by the Office have not yet been removed by the appellants. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. The CLMA also stands
811 of 2008
of 2008 Mr. D.N. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. None for the respondent No. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition. Permission granted. Accordingly, the petition is …
(MS) of 2005 Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. (Civil Misc. Application No.12646/05) None present for the petitioner though called thrice. Sri Sudhir Kuamr, learned brief holder for the State-respondent. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. All the pending applications …
74/2005
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL. A.O. No. 63/2007 Narayan Singh Rawat .. Petitioner. Versus M/s ICICI Lombard Pvt. Motor General Insurer .. Respondent. Sri Z.U. Siddiqui, learned counsel for the petitioner/claimant. Sri Sarvesh Agarwal, learned counsel for the respondent. AND …
3554 of 2001
COURT OF UTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 3554 of 2001 (M/S) WPMS/27838/1998 Karamat Ali ………. Petitioner Versus State of U.P. (now Uttarakhand and others ……… Respondents ……… None for the petitioner. Mr. B. D. Upadhyaya,
1249 of 2008
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting (Chapter VIII, Rule 32(2) (b) Description of Case Criminal Misc. Application No.829 of 2008 Date of decision :-26.12.2008 A.F.R. (Approved for Reporting) Not approved for reporting …
962 of 2003
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 962 of 2003 (M/S) Baba Kali Kamliwala ……. Petitioner Versus Civil Judge (J.D.), Rishikesh and another ……. Respondents ……… None for the petitioner. Mr. P.C. Bisht, Brief Holder for the State.
8877 of 2008
No. 8877 of 2008 In WPCRL No. 1042 of 2008 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Mr. Jagdish Singh Bisht, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Nandan Arya, learned A.G.A. for the respondents. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed to issue a
6/2007
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL. A.O. No. 261/ 2008 New India Assurance Company Ltd. .. Appellant. Versus Smt. Kamala Devi and others ……. Respondents. Sri P.C. Maulekhi, learned counsel for the appellant. Sri B.S. Negi, learned counsel for claimants/respondents. Dated …
1223 of 2008
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1223 of 2008 (M/S) (Old No. 1462 of 1995) Jameel Ahmad ............. Petitioner Versus State Transport Appellate Tribunal U.P., Lucknow and others ............. Respondents ................. None for the petitioner. Mr. P.C. …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault