Filter precedents
1
Reset all15057 of 2008
No. 15057 of 2008. 29.12.2009. Present: Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General, for the respondents. Petitioner has retired after attaining the age of superannuation on 30th November, 2006. However, petitioner’s leave …
2492 of 2008
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP (T) No. 2492 of 2008 (OA No. 2104/1999) Judgment reserved on: 20.11.2009 Date of decision: 29.12.2009. Om Dutt …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others ....Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. Whether approved …
Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. (Misc. Withdrawal Appln. No.1359/09) Sri G.C. Lakhchaura, Adv. i/b Sri Gopal Krishan, Advocate for the applicants. Sri M.A. Khan, learned brief holder for the State. By way of application No.1359/09, the applicant has prayed to withdraw the present …
Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Mr. L.K. Tewari, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri M.A. Khan, learned brief holder for the State, who makes a statement that after completion of investigation, charge sheet has been filed against the other accused persons, however the petitioners have not …
Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. None for the petitioners. Mr. M.A. Khan, learned brief holder for the State, who makes a statement that after completion of investigation, charge sheet has been submitted in this case, hence this writ petition has been rendered infructuous. In view of the …
828 of 2004
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.1283 (S/S) of 2006 Ajveer Singh Chauhan S/o Sri Rajendra Singh ….. Petitioner Versus Bank of Baroda & ors. …… Respondents Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Sri A.M. Saklani, the learned counsel for the petitioner and
Bench: J.S. Khehar, J. J.S. Khehar, C.J.Mr. Rajendra Dobhal301 of 2009
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Civil Misc. Contempt Application No. 301 of 2009 Dr. Nakli Singh …Applicant Versus Col. Dr. J.S. Virk …Respondent Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. J.S. Khehar, C.J. (Oral) Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, Senior Advocate
Bench: J.S. Khehar, J. J.S. Khehar, Ram Chandra Nautiyal, Ganga Prasad Dangwal330 of 2009
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Special Appeal No. 262 of 2009 Ganga Prasad Dangwal ….. Appellant. Versus District Magistrate Uttarkashi and others … Respondents. Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, learned counsel for the appellant. Mr. H.M. Raturi, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. …
429/2009
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.377 OF 2009 (U/s 482 Of Cr.P.C.) Riyasat Ali & another …………Applicants Versus State of Uttarakhand & another …………Respondents Dated: December 29, 2009 Sri Tumul Nailwal, Adv.
286 of 2009
of 2009 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. Lalit Kumar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Vikas Pandey, Standing Counsel (Union of India) for the respondent. Having heard the learned counsel for the applicant, this Court is of the opinion that no willful contempt is made out. The mere …
View Full Judgment
Save to My Vault